how do i make of not make look like shit?
pico relatedo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software paint.net 4.0.6 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:27 17:28:06 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/9.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.5 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>5170x3447
Read the sticky before you post you fucking autist
>>2711274
here u guv m8te
sorry for cloggin up your wee board
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software paint.net 4.0.6 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 118 dpcm Vertical Resolution 118 dpcm Image Created 2015:11:27 17:28:06 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/9.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.5 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2711276
>f/9.5
what the fuck
>>2711276
That's better.
>>2711279
max aperture 5.6, guess it's sharper that closed
>>2711279
what's wrong with f9.5?
sorry i get really confused on how to work with aperture. ISO, shutter are all easy but i don't get aperture. just lets in more/less light and changes DoF, correct? what exactly is wrong with f9.5, is it just a weird number?
>>2711279
f/9-f/11
is usually normal "it doesn't matter" setting, you know, when you go around and just make photos without having to change your settings every fucking shot.
Try holding your camera level, OP.
>>2711497
60D has an electronic level, as well.
Really though, don't rely on it or the bubble level... just your eyes. Sometimes the shot is better if it's off level by a couple of degrees, depending on certain things (like if you're not shooting directly parallel to a shoreline)
>>2711501
that's what i meant by the built in spirit level
anyways, removing noise? any tips? iso was already at 100 but it still looks noisy.
>>2711525
It looks noisy probably because you exposed for the sky and tried to bring out the shadow details in post. Old Canon cameras are unfortunately not the best for shadow recovery, but even then in a shot like this you'd probably want to have done multiple exposures with most cameras, it'd look cleaner that way.
