Xpro2
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
RELEASE IT ALREADY FUJI, GOD FUCKIN DAMNIT IM TIRED OF WAITING
I wouldnt wait for yet another camera with crushed blacks and weak tonal representation,
>>2688663
are you shooting jpeg only m8?
in the case that you're shooting raw, blame your shitty processor and get a new one
>>2688663
do you even....
nevermind.
>>2688663
>camera with crushed blacks
>>2688654
I am going to use xpro2 with 27mm pancake lens so hard that it will become illegal.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:10:20 22:47:38 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1468 Image Height 861
>>2688663
oh hi there ken rockwell
>>2688654
good things come to those who are late.
>>2688834
If you're American, don't take it to the park. You might have the police called on you.
>>2689112
Elaborate?
>>2688654
Yes, all I want is an overpriced body, no real viewfinder and dated tiny sensor that no processing software fully supports.
Lol.
>>2689126
>an overpriced body
Poor mans leica, solid build quality, incredible lens quality, nothing wrong with pricing.
>no real viewfinder
Its called rangefinder for a reason and exist for quite some time you uneducated fuck.
> dated tiny sensor
They are using brand new Sony sensor you fuckwit.
> no processing software fully supports
Wot? Capture one works very nicely.
Get some education before you start spergin. Fuckin hell I was sure the summer was over.
>>2689134
did you know it IS possible to overuse a meme?
Well it is. And you did that.
>>2689117
>Elaborate?
Here you go
http://kfor.com/2015/10/15/man-writes-open-letter-to-woman-reporting-creepy-guy-in-park/
>>2685869
>>2689134
>Its called rangefinder
it doesn't have rangefinder focusing
it's not a real rangefinder
it is whatever the hell it is; some weird neato hybrid opical/evf that's at least more convenient than a rf.
>They are using brand new Sony sensor you fuckwit.
unless sony jews them and releases a better version of the same thing immediately after under their own label.
a7000 delayed, but xpro2 at least has some kind of date.
>Capture one works very nicely.
it does if you're a pleb
use iridient if you're fuji mustard rice
the viewfinder was ass on this
>>2689167
100% if they gave it the switchable hybrid ovf/evf people would just stick to the more useful evf
unless they make some dramatic, useful changes to the original ovf
>>2689212
what are you talking about? xpro1 has switchable ovf/evf
>>2689134
>They are using brand new Sony sensor
Oh, so the only USP it has over an A6000 is a completely useless viewfinder, not bad for what, twice the price? grrrreat.
>in b4, muh fuji lenses aren't as sharp on a bayer sensor cry babies.
>>2688834
>not the new 35 f2.
>>2688873
What's the "Five Year" mean in the 5th column??
>>2689212
battery life, latency, outside-the-frame composition...
>>2689537
Sidebar, what is with the hype around this lens? I bought my 35 1.4 brand new for $350 (on sale at B&H). Unless this f2 is going to be a super performer, I don't feel like the lower MSRP is enough for it to be a consideration
>>2689569
weather sealing, new optical design probably.
>>2689569
also smaller, inexpensive, and better AF performance, according to rumors.
So early X-Pro2 cameras are getting sent out to early reviewers
I only really want more megapickels and the same sharp sensor as before in the XP2. I'm new to Fuji and I downgraded from 24MP to 16MP for the amazing glass.
More megapickels, same amazing sensor & maybe an OVF in a light package would make it a must buy.
>>2689134
it actually isn't called a rangefinder by fuji, because it isn't a rangefinder, you educated fuck.
>>2690706
Why do you want 24 megapixels?
>More noise.
>24 is not good enough for product/large prints.
>Not wanting a Fuji medium format rangefinder.
>And HSS.
>>2689549
I shoot both RAW and Jpeg
>Hi Steve Huff
>>2690774
>Why do you want 24 megapixels?
I can crop more
>>2690804
>Crop more
what are you a wild life tog
faggot get closer
>>2690804
I hope they release it soon. Going ham for fuji.
Need to sell d800 before Nikon cucks its second hand price down further
Will the Xpro2 have the Xtrans sensor?
>>2691740
All rumors indicate yes.
fuck;n february, i hope its a worthy machine fudgy.
>>2691759
I actually saw a rumor recently saying otherwise. They may be switching to a Sony sensor instead. Which would be a damn shame.
>>2692551
They have all been Sony sensors, with a different color filter array.
>>2692557
Thanks for the clarification
>>2692598
No problem.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
>>2692612
There are no reasons in this post. Just pointing that out.
>>2689134
>poor mans leica
fam I bought my m9 and a 35mm cron for $3k.
>>2692663
And you can get an X-T10 with a Fuji 23mm for less than half that... You can get an X-Pro1 and Fuji 35 for 1/4.
>>2692557
This.
Fuji has no in-house sensor fab.
It has in-house sensor R&D, but no manufacturing.
jan 15 seems to be the date for fujurumours.
I really expect something solid, a device that can stay relevant when the next products comes from competition.
Also for fucks sake fuji release a 23mm (35mmequiv) WR pancake lens.
What raw processor is good for RAFs? The included silkypix thing sucks. Anything good for free?
>>2693434
Does it have competition? A rangefinder style retro APS-C ILC with fantastic lenses and a unique color array?
>>2696080
Fine detail? Photoninja is the best. Color, mixed with a library feature? Capture One.
Free? Not that I know of.
>>2696080
Raw the rapee.
If you have a mac, Iridient Dev is good (everything is free on the internet)
>>2696080
capture one pro is good as always
I have an X-T1 and I put my RAF files straight into Lightroom.... am I fucking up? Why should I use another program to "process" them and wtf does that even mean?
Do I run the RAF files through lets say "photo ninja" and then export to Lightroom from there?
>>2698690
Lightroom/adobe was a bit fucky when treating RAF files last I checked. Like, it was the worst converter among the bunch. I guess you could give others a try, its an extra step in the workflow but oh well.
I have transitioned to Capture one, using multiple brands and sensors, and If you have the money to spend, fuck lightroom Id say.
Lroom is a nice comfy program, but nowhere near close to C1 for tethering, colouring, toning, converting.
>January 15 xpro2
Fuji, please ffs dont screw this up.
>>2698690
> I put my RAF files straight into Lightroom.... am I fucking up? Why should I use another program to "process" them
processing fuuj raws in LR leads to a dramatic loss of detail compared with other compatible converters
ie. using the jpegs processed in-camera retain detail better
>>2698732
>Lightroom/adobe was a bit fucky when treating RAF files last I checked. Like, it was the worst converter among the bunch.
still is the worst. some say it has improved, but I don't think so
>Fuji, please ffs dont screw this up.
plz jeebus..
