Oh, 4chan! You never know what those pranksters will do next.

That is a somewhat old /b/ thread.

Clickbait sites are doing stuff from screencaps now?

>>40070
Le based 4chans xd

>>40070
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-3551355/They-ll-never-learn-Man-asks-internet-Photoshop-botched-tourist-picture-Leaning-Tower-Pisa-inundated-hilarious-results.html

They're promoting 4chan in order to flood us with immigrants, same as Europe.

>>40070
that gets literally posted once a month on tdm.

>>40100
I swear at least 33%-66% of all Daily Mail "news" links on 4chan are pushed here by marketing interns, especially the ones that mention 4chan. They're just pandering to us for extra pageviews. It works for Breitbart on other boards, I bet they are just trying to get in on a piece of the action.

Don't forget, every Daily Mail story that appears on their site is greenlit by Editor in Chief of the Online division Piers Morgan.

>capital C
>copyright: 4Chan
Oh I'm laffin.

>>40110
>Editor in Chief of the Online division Piers Morgan
How has nobody throttled that asshat yet?

So was this /b/, /int/, or /wsr/?
If anyone can find the thread, cross link it and we can come full circle.

>>40135
The guy asked on /b/ iirc. I imagine he got exactly what he was expecting.

>>40133
and the "independent" or the guardian are much better?
at least mail admits to be a tabloid, the other two full on ile about it...

>>40145
Piers, pls.
I didn't say anything about the DailyMail.

That's not news and I wish he was banned for putting 4chan links.

Hiro-sama do something about this!

>>40070

I thought this was on reddit.

Everybody wants to be cool just like us...

>>40145
>or the guardian are much better?
The Guardian" is a curious mix. A low reading age, combined with so-called 'progressive' values (that seldom, if ever, bear any scrutiny or challenge) and a middle class cultural mindset which advocates for the finer arts. However, most of the articles are rather basic in their grammatical construction and designed for the mass audience rather than dilettantes, but the ones who read them certainly regard themselves as dilettantes.

I think "The Guardian" uses this strategy to demonstrate to the world that they are really quite sophisticated when, in fact, they're quite superficial.
The bien pensant and 'progressives', however, think they are drinking directly from the cup of sophistication whilst railing against the establishment.
In short, champagne socialism.

What a lot of people believe, including many who post here, is that the Guardian is some kind of "radical" left wing paper.
It's nothing of the sort: it's just the pinkish wing of the global establishment.