http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/three-of-cliven-bundys-sons-militia-seize-federal-building-in-oregon/article/2579459
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/militia-takes-ore-fed-building-protest-article-1.2483723
wonder how this will play out
There just might be a little hope left for America. Not real sure about the reasoning but at least it's something. Somebody has to tell the cocksuckers no sometime and stick to it. Damn-it, You know Jeb?
How much longer before black lives matter protesters come in and try to protest in Oregon?
They're looking for a reason to institute marshal law anyway. You might as well give it to them and get this show on the road.
There aren't any blacks in Oregon. Oh!!
don't these people have jobs?
It's ok, They've been saving for the occasion. Plus it's winter amd farmers don't work in winter. They got plenty of time on their hands.
>>13435
Yeah but theyre the 99% and theyre pissed off. Thats why theyre occupying the federal express.
>>13427
>Washington Examiner
>According to Politico, "When it came to the editorial page, Anschutz’s instructions were explicit — he 'wanted nothing but conservative columns and conservative op-ed writers,' said one former employee." The Examiner's writers include Byron York, Michael Barone, and David Freddoso.
>New York Daily News
>Tabloid
Topkek
>>13427
>federal building
It's just a park ranger station. This is being sensationalized all too hell.
>>13439
What can you expect from a tabloid and conservative news? (this applies to liberal news as well I just don't want retards on my dick)
We'll take what we can get. It has to start somewhere. A spark catches fire as these boys already know.
>>13441
Cool. So, I expect you're not gonna talk shit and actually plan to join them?
We need a new type of governing system anyway and unlike any that exsist today or in the past. Something for the times that's more appropriate for our advanced world. All the leadership around the world right now is shit and so are the styles of government use.
>>13441
Who is "we" and what is "it" ?
>>13444
Nothing. He's just one of those fags who goes "YEAH, THE REVOLUTION IS COMING!" and doesn't actually stand by his principles and convictions. Rather than do anything, he's gonna sit his ass comfortably behind the computer doing nothing because it's easier. Much like the very same people he ridicules for doing nothing and calls "sheep".
See: OP picture.
Americans and Revolution
You're right Friend, that's exactly what I'm gonna do.
BTW, I call them sheeple.
So, instead starting to put each other down do to the eminence of the situation. Why don't we start coming up with some solutions of how things are gonna be handled. So we don't get stuck with our dicks in our hands when it's over.
to* & due*
I'm listening or do you want me to just come up with it all by my little lonesome? That would be a dictatorship and it has already been done. It doesn't work. Neither does capitalism, communism,fascism,socialism, kings ,queens or any of the bs. So what? Anarchy? You might as well help or they'll through nukes on us because they're assholes. WTF do you want to do?
Don't worry about it girls and boys. I know you don't have a clue. Daddy has it under control.
>>13427
>http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/three-of-cliven-bundys-sons-militia-seize-federal-building-in-oregon/article/2579459
"We're planning on staying here for years, absolutely," he told The Oregonian. "This is not a decision we've made at the last minute."
get the popcorn and a comfy blanket, this show is going to have a long run, folks
>>13433
>marshal law
MARTIAL, ffs
>>13435
Its the weekend m8
>>13427
I'm a Hammond, but I'm not too close with the ones causing trouble, I've only been up at the ranch a few times. Two years ago my dad talked to me about the serious legal problem our family had been dealing with, since then I haven't heard nor asked much. From what I recall, the BLM has been after that land since before I was born, there once was a time where this could have been avoided, but someone in our family is just making things worse. Damn shame, beautiful place. It's a lost cause and an embarrassment now.
>>13469
Go there right now and take some pictures
>>13454
I have a solution. Let's evolve into a hive mind society. Bzzzzzz.
>>13458
Marshal law only exists in tekken tbh fam
>>13442
Support for a cause doesn't require active participation. I was in Arab Spring, where were you when it was time to bring civilization to the Maghreb? Sitting home whining about how people are pussies for not participating?
>>13443
How about a federal republic constrained by a constitution which delegates a very limited set of powers to each brand of government, that way individual citizens can blaze the paths of technological and economic progress without being hamstrung by inept government bureaucrats so things can work themselves out naturally.
>>13558
Individualism and collectivism are incompatible. Neither philosophy by itself will achieve the optimal result at micro or macro levels.
The libcucks on my fb feed are all saying this is real terrorism. Here's the one that really made me cringe:
[sic]
Militia? Lets call them what they really are, A gang of terrorist. Can you imagine the news coverage if this was an all muslim, mexican or black group? Donlad Trump would all ready be demanding we "Bomb Oregon off the map" and "This is why we need a wall!". This event clearly shows our confusion of what we label as terrerist. We sure can recognise a terrorist half way around the world but cant recognize the ones in our back yard. Lets make examples of these men and prosecute them like we would foreign terrorist.
Bah, they just wanna excuse to shoot thier Texas Security Blankets and become martyrs to set off thier 'glorious Revolution'
Don't give it to them, just wait these fuckers out.
>>13564
*gag*
>>13567
This. They took over a national park Ranger Station in Oregon in the middle of winter. Shut off the utilities, get back to us in April.
>>13427
I cannot understand why starting forest fires shouldn't be illegal.
"Controlled" my ass. Unless you have the support and approval of a firefighter brigade, it shouldn't be legal to set the woods on fire, regardless of your ability to control it, merely because some other fucker might do the same and get out of hands.
You cannot base the legality of your actions in "trust me officer, it was controlled, I'm different from your average idiot".
And given the premise that you cannot claim control over the fire, then you cannot say bullshit like "muh jurisditcion", because it affects on a federal level too.
If they had stormed the federal building to gain the rights to start controlled fires, I would have been sympathetic.
>>13588
Keep in mind they also started the fires to cover up poaching
why do americans think they can fight the government if it really came down to it?
An official rebellion will get steamrolled simply because of the technology gap.
This is 15-odd idiots in a standoff, not a bloody revolution.
>>13621
If you ask /pol/ it's the first battle of the second civil war...
It isn't their fault really, they get their news from shit tier sources like Alex Jones, who have a business interest in making people think the revolution and/or endtimes are here now today.
>>13614
>vietnam
>iraq
>afghanistan
>literally every revolution ever
It's called aymmetrical warfare shithead. Jets cannot stand on street corners and enforce curfew. Tanks can't search your house for contraband and anti-gov propaganda. Even a huge tech gap doesn't guarantee victory for the government forces. Granted, guerillas probably wouldn't win without aid from another country, but they won't lose without it either. Strong public support is mandatory but not impossible to get in a police state when civil liberties are severely curtailed and this inconveniences everyday life (the sort of gov we'd have to have for an open revolution like that to be attempted)
>>13625
>Jets cannot stand on street corners and enforce curfew.
drones can.
>Tanks can't search your house
they wouldn't need to. Various companies have been collecting shit tons of data on everything you do. If revolution comes, the gov will just force access to all this data.
A revolution here would be vastly different than anywhere else. We aren't invading some shit hole country where we barely know the enemy. I don't think you understand how huge of a difference this creates.
Anyone can go onto your facebook right now and pick out the political beliefs of nearly every single one of your friends or acquaintances, then promptly walk into the house and dispose of them.
Big data is a secret police's wet dream.
>>13588
Controlled forest fires help reduce the ferocity of wild forest fires. You plan to burn sections of dead wood to give the forest a new space to grow into again. If you don't burn the dead wood, the amount of fuel for wild forest fires increases over the years. Large uncontrollable fires will ravage the land because they have all the fuel they need and will damage nearby residences.
>>13614
I don't think we would have to fight the government. A large portion of our population is proud to have served or currently serve in the military. A coup would be much more likely.
>>13624
> If you ask /pol/
Asking /pol/ for analysis of current political affairs is like asking /r9k/ for dating advices.
>>13642
not to mention the french did most of the leg work anyway.
>>13643
My point was that /pol/ has been whipped into a fervor about this story (mores than usual) and seem to think some kind of Waco-like siege is imminent. Many of the posters ITT are from /pol/.
>>13646
>My point was that /pol/ has been whipped into a fervor about this story (mores than usual) and seem to think some kind of Waco-like siege is imminent.
/pol/ is posting cuck memes and shit bait as is usual. They don't even have any idea that this is happening. They aren't even a news board or a political board anymore. It's literally just copypasta memes.
>>13652
>They don't even have any idea that this is happening
You could have just said you don't go there without the speech on how horrible /pol/ is. There have been about 100 threads about this in just the past 12 hours..way too may to crosslink here
>>13654
>I don't go there.
I shit post on there daily. I never take it seriously. It's genuinely an awful board with no purpose.
>>13477
Pictures of Spider-Man.
>>13435
I think it's pretty obvious that they don't.
>>13642
>they've kept that dellusion from a time when the country's forces where based on civil militia with regular muskets.
I love how whenever they talk about overthrowing the government they always bring up The Revolutionary War but never the Civil War.
>>13676
You mean The War of Northern Aggression?
>>13564
We American Taliban now.
>>13564
>libcucks
please help me get it straight.
libcucks are liberals or libertarians?
what is the difference between those?
Why the fuck are they called so similar?
Is it a common occurrence to confuse them, or I'm the only idiot that does it?
>>13680
I know you're joking but whatever you call it the South got curbstomped.
>>13621
its actually 100-150
>>13427
The Bundy family stole from taxpayers AND from every last one of their neighbors. They all deserve to be dead or in prison.
>>13696
The Supreme Court of the US ruled in 1869 Texas v. White that the states never legally seceded and were in fact merely occupied by militants of an illegitimate and ephemeral nation state.
tl;dr they never overthew anythng
>>13427
>set controlled burn on land that isn't yours
>burn "gets out of hand"
>government thinks there's enough evidence to show that they were covering up poaching
This is white peoples equivalent of Ferguson. Black people were upset over an obvious thug getting what came to him and now white people are getting upset over a poacher getting what comes to him.
>>13732
>I didn't actually read the entire history of the land and what the conflict is about
Fuck off.
>>13457
Just block all the roads and wait a few weeks for the protesters to get tired.
>>13454
National Socialism of course
>>13562
America is based upon the empowerment and freedom of the individual, so collectivism only happens if the individuals collectivize on their own.
>>13778
The worry is that they'll start hunting endangered species and burning down forests when they're isolated.
>>13785
Poaching claims are unsubstantiated and they already served federal time for the accidental fire.
>>13788
Well regardless of the poaching claims hunting for food is still an option, although burning wood would really only be viable if they had axes on hand.
>>13427
well they'll probably be shot to death soon.
it's like if john brown the abolitionist lived again, but instead of fighting against slavery his family fought against cattle taxes or whatever that asshole wants so bad
>>13793
You understand why they start brush fires right?
And the second brush fire was started by a lightning strike, and their counter burn just pushed the fire away?
>>13437
>99%
I don't have stats for the whole family but Cliven is likely a 1% based on income
http://www.alternet.org/fox-news-hero-cliven-bundy-pampered-millionaire-not-rugged-rancher
>>13429
with them being shot to death?
>>13771
read more plz
>>13683
From context, I assume they meant liberals. libertarians are people who want no government and believe that corporations are being held back by government. 90% of people who know anything about libertarians recognize them as huge fucking idiots. their political ideology is seductive if you don't read very much, but is largely a subject of mockery and fun.
liberal is a much broader term. There are classical liberals, but that phrase only gets used by pedants and weirdos who insist on old definitions. they have literal to zero connection to modern liberals, which are basically left wing people. they are sometimes distinguished from leftists (leftists themselves are generally more interested in this distinction) who are less centrist than liberals. liberal is sometimes used a term of contempt by leftists and others (as in "love me, I'm a liberal") to describe an ineffectual and soft-minded person who feels they've fulfilled their democratic duty by voting once every four years.
I hope that helps you understand the place those words have in the culture. This, by the way, is all from an American perspective. Libertarian means something completely different in Europe (a sort of leftist anarchist. Noam Chomsky, a leftist, calls himself one.)
If you got any questions feel free to ask
>>13807
>liberal is a much broader term. There are classical liberals, but that phrase only gets used by pedants and weirdos who insist on old definitions.
They did, "libtards" is a common pejorative in certain circles. A google search is hilarious imho.
>>13807
>I don't understand libertarianism much less any other political standpoint but I'll shitpost about it anyway
Reddit is down the hall and to the left
Reminder these rednecks throwing a tantrum are by definition terrorists, and literally too stupid to affect change in any meaningful way so resort to MUH GUNZ, violence and extremely vague and improperly thought out demands.
They're looking more pathetic than ISIS at this point
>>13820
An actual definition of the history and different definitions of the word "libertarian" would either be too short to be useful or too long to be read here. When I say 90% of people who know two things about libertarians think they're fucking retards, I'm not trying to make a judgement about the philosophy, I'm just stating a simple fact about their perception on message boards like this. I'm sure you'll agree if you take yourself at all seriously.
>>13818
There's a funny distinction between how conservatives hate liberals and how leftists hate liberals. Conservatives hate liberals with Janeane Garofalo liberal memes, and leftists say shit like:
https://i.imgur.com/6kByqUl.png
>>13827
>a simple fact about perception
Nope.
90% of the time it isnt an actual libritarian and such some neo-con.
>>13828
>libritarian
was that a typo or a subtle reference to the euro definition?
>about [...] perception
why'd ya cut that word? not trying to accuse you of nothin, just seemed like a weird move
The "actual libertarian" argument I've heard before, and it's frustrating because if the word means nothing, why do you insist on calling yourself a libertarian? Why not use a word that is understood, or at least paired with an adjective to be distinct?
>>13831
I'm a le ebin true reactionary, not a lolbritarian
Will any of these retards actually kill someone in their blaze of glory? I'm a bit concerned about when the police move in.
>>13837
I think they thought the people would rise up like Enjorales thought they would in Les Miserables before the vending machine was empty. They're probably in there right now, humming "Do You Hear The People Sing... singing the song of angry men... the song of a people who Will Not Be Slaves Again... When the sing.s.s.dg..sd.....
why am I typing out all these lyrics? oh right im drunk again. Okay peace, imma go get some pollo loco and check on this thread in a minute
>>13427
15 guys take over a closed down ranger stations and left wing idiots are screaming terrorism.
These guys still haven't done anything that comes close to what your run of the mill black lives matter shit head has done.
>>13440
It's the left tards screaming "terrorism"!!!!!!!!
>>13732
they dindo nuthin', y'all
Seriously, I used to be against drone strikes on American citizens but these guys are changing my mind.
>>13841
FoxNews are the ones saying they are terrorists, they aren't exactly The Liberal Media.
>>13842
I've always been pro drone strike, as long as it's tards like you that get struck.
Move to North Korea or one of the other 200+ slave states if you want to be a slave.
>>13489
we are the borg, you will be assimilated, resistance is futile
>>13807
>libertarians are now anarchists
What the fuck am I reading?
>>13427
>Cliven Bundy
Lol. He had his own standoff with the government a couple years ago that almost turned into a shootout.
Interesting how this one will turn out now
>>13841
If these people were brown you'd call them terrorists
>>14005
Except they don't have a history of terrorism around the globe, haven't done anything violent, and are somewhat organized.
>>14044
White christian men are shooting up the US and Europe all the time
>>14050
Except they arnt.
The vast majority are, in the US, black males under 30 and in Europe it's immigrant non-western males.
>>14050
Well for Europe, the absolute majority of people are European... so it would make sense.
Even then immigrants commit more crime.
Secondly, you are blatantly false.
Most murders and "mass shootings" (anything over 2) are committed by black males.
>>14052
So what are dylan roof and anders brevik?
>>14054
>>14052
>Most
we aren't talking about the majority of cases, we are discussing the statement
>Except they don't have a history of terrorism around the globe, haven't done anything violent, and are somewhat organized.
>Except they don't have a history of terrorism around the globe, haven't done anything violent
White christian men do have a history of terrorism around the globe
>>14057
Two people who commited crimes.
>>14058
Terrorism and conquest are two entirely different things friend.
Muslims have statically soared above the rest of religious groups, and Arab muslims, above other ethnicities in acts of terror around the globe.
White Christian men don't.
Also, anders brevrick was not a Christian.
>>14058
Ah now I see what you're saying.
Yes, all people commit all kinds of acts regardless of their race or affiliation.
Muslims and Arab Muslims just happen to commit a significantly higher amount of terroristic attacks; most likley because of their radical ideology and unchecked political structures.
>>14061
Crimes with an intent to terrorise.
>Muslims have statically soared above the rest of religious groups, and Arab muslims, above other ethnicities in acts of terror around the globe.
White Christian men don't.
>statically soared
what does this mean?
The majority of politically motivated shootings in the US last year were comitted by white guys. No shit the vast majority of terror acts across the globe are committed by arab muslims, the arabian subcontinent is in the middle of a war. I dont know if you noticed this.
>>14062
Why are you talking about muslims?
>>14058
>>14064
Just going to bring this discussion back around to the original point:
>>14005
>If these people were brown you'd call them terrorists
And I wouldn't, because they aren't terrorizing anyone. But if it makes you feel better the gov't probably considers them "Sovereign Citizen Extremists", which are basically terrorists in their book.
>>14005
If they were brown, they would be portrayed by the media and other libtards as peaceful protesters, much like the BLM, except they messed with airports and major centers of commerce instead of a remote park station more in line with this group's gripe.
>>14064
Well, being 60% of the population sure helps when taking into account such things, but also that the current structure of schooling and politics targets white males in the United states and makes them feel more inclined to politically act out.
Anyway, statistically Muslims and African Americans still commit more politically motivated shootings.
>>14065
Because you're talking about Europe.
>>14070
>the current structure of schooling and politics targets white males in the United states and makes them feel more inclined to politically act out
Are you seriously acting as an apologist for white mass shooters?
You are way too far down the rabbit hole friend, seek help and question what you read on 4chan.
>African Americans still commit more politically motivated shootings
Cite a case, and there has only been one politically muslim shooting in the US in 2015
>>14073
Are you an apologist for thugs and Muslim terrorists?
>cite one
There have been dozens of cases that get caught early in the act, one would be the Texas shooting, there is the shooting at the army base, the one in California.
And so on.
>>14096
>Are you an apologist for thugs and Muslim terrorists?
No. We are talking about white extremism here. Why d you feel the need to constantly refer to muslims and blacks?
You had to go back to 2009 for a poitically motivated black shooting? Where do you get the impression that "African Americans still commit more politically motivated shootings"?
>>14100
Literally just had one.
Bryce Williams you dumb motherfucker.
I am referring to other groups because you are saying
>DEEZE WHITE CHRISTIAN RAYCISS IS BEING PROTECTED BY DEEZE STATE
This is hardly extremism, as this it's in an unoccupied federal building in a national park (placed there illegally a two hundred years ago).
As well as saying stupidly incorrect things such as
>WHITE CHRISTIAN MALES SHOOT UP EUROPE AND AMERIKKKA ALL THA TIME!
>>14102
>>DEEZE WHITE CHRISTIAN RAYCISS IS BEING PROTECTED BY DEEZE STATE
Thats not what I am saying at all. I am arguing against the point that white people never commit political violence.
You were talking about the guy who shot two people because he was jealous of their love life? How is that political?
>>14102
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/30/AR2010073003254.html
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/06/09/las-vegas-shooting-officers-dead-possible-white-supremacists.html
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=129666
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knoxville_Unitarian_Universalist_church_shooting
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/us/01tiller.html?pagewanted=all
should I go on?
>>14106
A. Where was that ever stated.
"White people", and by that I presume you mean Europeans, have had a monopoly on violence for over four hundred years.
We are the masters of violence, as it is in our primal but sophisticated nature.
B.
He released a very clear political manifesto. That was quickly swept up and silenced by the government.
>>14107
Listen child, this is what we call cherrypicking.
If you would like to complie this data in an orderly manner to make a statistical trend, and have it published and reviewed, go ahead.
But you won't like the results.
>>14106
If they were brown, how do you think the media would cover the situation? What makes them terrorists in this case? Because they're armed and ready to defend themselves? If they were out for wanton destruction, carnage, and general mayham on as many civilians as they could manage, then yeah, I would say they're terrorists. I don't agree with their methods, but that doesn't mean their intent is to terrorize.
>>14112
Mayhem*
>>14111
>he doesn't know it's already been "compiled" thousands of times
Here's a clue, genius:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/us/tally-of-attacks-in-us-challenges-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html
>>14112
A group of armed muslims illegally occupying a building would be labelled as terrorists, regardless of intention.
>>14120
I know it as a fact. They would maybe not be labeleld by the government as terrorists, but the media and 4chan would bandy about the word and you're naive to think otherwise.
>>14120
Does it really matter? Or are you wanting to take this to /pol/ ?
>>14115
t. Alberto Barbossa
>let's exclude that pesky 2001 attack or statistics
>let's just do raw numbers, that always works... right?
>>14123
I quoted the post. And it was not "violence" it was "political violence"
>>14126
Seizing government property with armed force is worse than terrorism, regardless of the lack of resistance.
>>14127
Wrong, that post says nothing that you say it does.
You have inserted your own personal narrative here.
>>14058
>>Except they don't have a history of terrorism around the globe, haven't done anything violent
Which was never said.
And now you're changing your position.
>>14130
Seizing private property is worse than terrorism, and worse than seizing government property.
>>14130
Oh yeah, a CLOSED Ranger station in buttfuck nowhere is 'seized with armed force'
>>14117
>Muslims
That wasn't the question. Muslims, particularly in this country, do have a much higher rate of terrorists conducted under the guise of religion or political agenda.
So what you're saying is that you believe that their acceptance of the 2nd amendment and decision to carry means they are using armed force to occupy a building? While that may be the case if they fire first, as established by law, but they have not. Libtards want to have it both ways, well it doesn't work like that.
>>14131
>which was never said
Yes it was
ctrl+F you retard
its not far from the post I linked, just click the numbers
>>14124
>he thinks muslims did 9/11
good goyim
>>14145
Innocent until proven guilty.
>>14148
I like how everybody forgot about the Anthrax attacks right after 9/11
>>14149
The mail attacks?
>>14155
Yes, the one the first Homeland Security Secretary told everyone to buy plastic sheeting to cover their windows with to protect themselves from... It came from a government lab and no legitimate arrests have ever been made. In fact the guy they thought did it had a rock solid alibi.
My point being, it wasn't islamic terror, but it was as much terror as 9/11 was.
For the newfriends: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks
>>14140
Let me dissect it for you since I see you are having trouble. Then I actually have to go to bed.
>>14044
Was posted in response to this post:
>If these people were brown you'd call them terrorists
Answering in that way implies that brown people have perpetrated political violence.
Fair enough, they have.
But this militia is also of a demographic. A white christian demographic. The conversation is about the types of people who act and the way in which we percieve their actions.
If a group of muslims did this would you think
>omg this congregation has never done anything violent before, or comitted global acts violence
or would you think
>holy shit some muslims have started an armed occupation, this could turn violent
Why does this militia get to operate without answering for the baggage of white political violence? At the same time why do peaceful moderate muslims have to answer for political violence that occurs halfway accross the globe?
I don't think that these guys are terrorists. But they could become terrorists very quickly.
>>14160
Because they arnt acting upon a holy jihad, this is over the (unjust) arrest of two Oregon farmers.
>>14160
Maybe, just maybe, because the United States has had a very difficult time dealing with Muslims and their countries since the dawn of its existence.
>>14161
No but they are acting in line with a long history of white anti-government extremism. Oklahoma city et al.
Goodnight
Where else are they calling them terrorists besides Fox News?
All the liberal blogs and CNN are calling them anti government protesters and MSNBC and SJW crowd are calling them extremists or Alex Jones wannabes.
>>14164
Top kek.
>it's extremism to be anti-federalist
>>14158
>it wasn't islamic terror
How do you know that? At this point, concluding that it was not is tinfoil hat idiocy.
>>14171
textbook confirmation bias, the post
>>14171
Because muslims wouldn't send Anthrax letters to senators and National Enquirer reporters.
9999 times out of 10000 they aren't so passive aggresive about jihad.
Muslims want to kill people who don't believe what they do. These people want to take out our corrupt government, please do. They don't want to kill the American people. Not sure how it will happen with them in Oregon?
The media wants us to fear anything that's a threat to our government. That doesn't mean it's a actual threat to us the people, but our government through the last 100 years have done more bad then good and has to end.
>>14177
>The media wants us to fear anything that's a threat to our government
Please, kid, Drudge and Breitbart.com are just as much "The Media" as the corporate owned so called liberal media is.
>>14177
It's more that the media tends to get better ratings when it is fear mongering rather than dispassionately reporting events accurately. Even better when they can get some demographic riled up about or otherwise engaged in a story with additional ploys. This goes for news outlets as well as smaller media outlets, like radio hosts and even down to bloggers.
In this case, it does currently appear that it is primarily Fox among the major news outlets labeling these people as such. I haven't followed the stories well enough to be able to say it's always been the case. Follow the line into all sorts of other media, and you will find a lot liberals referring to them as such (especially those more in the news-entertainment line), even politicians.
>>13427
wow Americans are finally standing up to totalitarianism.
>>14198
It's 1772 all over again?!
>>13427
Patriotism has always bugged me. Why would you want to fight for a country when all of them are shit?
>>14198
>totalitarianism
inigomontoya.jpg
>>13544
Kind of like how you're whining and not participating now, but claiming to be part of this group?
>>14333
For the chance to make them good or at least better, even for a little while.
>>14371
No, anon, it's not at all like that.
They're asking for food now, kek.
