It really didn't desu

>>66328871
it didn't

>>66328871
less catchy Chrvches, not really that interesting beyond that. 2nd album tried to be poppier and it sucked. Unless they make a good 3rd album its all over

it was grating obnoxious music to begin with

but you probably listen to churches, lmao
who have themselves shamelessly cloned purity rings sound and sound equally "dated", lmao

>>66328918
>>66328920
the two aren't that similar aside from being in the same genre
I like the trap vibes of purity ring way more desu

>>66328918
>>66328920
Not OP but I find chvrches to be dated too.

It all sounds like pastiches of early 2010s microgenres.

>>66328871
It didn't, fampai

>>66328942
>the same genre
Get the fuck out, you literal child.

>>66328973
They're both synthpop, autist.

>>66328973
You sound triggered.

>>66328999
>>66329000
t. embryos

>>66328999
>>66329000
>rekt by double trips
damn

>>66328943
lol desu Chvrches is just as dated its just that they managed some pop hits so they stuck around longer, such is pop music

id still argue that chvrches did a better job at making conventionally catchy songs than purity ring; hell my friends have already taken purity ring out of their playlists whilst chvrches still gets played at parties so

>>66329069
t. embryo

It didn't date poorly at all. It actually beat the mainstream craze over "trap" sounds by a year or two.

>>66328871
Because it came from that amazing early 2010s ethereal pitch-shifted electronic dreamy period of music.

>>66329089
Yeah it was ahead of the curve and the songs still hold up today. It just sounds dated because everybody started making the same sound until it got boring then moved on.

>>66328973
>>66329018
>>66329088
t. crybaby

>>66328871
All of their songs are still fucking crazy