>no way to tell if your mp3 has been upscaled
>>66145258
It has been, i upload torrents with upscaled mp3s just to fuck with people, I also sometimes put the wrong album info and lock them as read only.
>>66145258
spectrogram
>>66145362
Doesn't always work.
This almost cuts off at 16 but not.
>>66145315
Shit im going to start doing this
>>66145507
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFVj4s3HMxk
>>66145315
U N H O L Y
N
H
O
L
Y
Exactly why I stopped downloading from the Archive and also why I don't Torrent. Bad tags and bad quality.
I don't really care if it's up scaled or not, my ears are too shit to notice
>>66145456
What?
A FLAC would cut off at 22.05 KHz, and that weird section in the middle would have frequencies up to the top. That'd obviously be a transcode if it were "lossless"
>>66146150
This isn't even a .flac file.
This is about whether it was upscaled from 128 to 320 kbps or not.
>>66145258
this
>>66145315
and this
are why everyone needs to just sack up, get a job, and pay for their music. if you are too poorfag to afford music you shouldn't have music.
>>66145258
>audio
>upscaling
Why would anyone bother converting upward? To make a download more appealing? Makes no sense, you literally gain nothing
>>66147272
to be a dick.
>>66145258
beggars can't be choosers. Either stop bitching or buy CDs.
>>66146366
I've never downloaded an album and have never had this problem. I've had 320 MP3 that cuts did at 16khz however. That's why I check them all with spek.
>>66148107
I meant to write "I've never downloaded this album and had this problem."
But anyway, downloading flac and then converting to 320 is the best way to go for the highest quality MP3.
