wdhmbt?
who's the girl :)
montie-faure dilemma
sal "dude weed xD"
daisiesfree
redpill me
t.embryo
r8/h8
Let's try to talk about music uh?
https://rateyourmusic.com/~JackAnderson94
https://rateyourmusic.com/~TEthearbiter
Haven't posted in these threads in a while desu. Are they still really bad?
>>66022878
they've gotten even worse, if you can believe it
>>66022891
Sad. Someday they can get better though, r-right?
>>66022878
nice 5s, however, yes, they have gotten worse and have been reduced to a general memery and teen drama. No one tries to have a discussion anymore.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Myskinn
>>66022932
Wew. I'm not surprised desu. These threads were never really that good anyway.
>>66022977
ciao Gentili
>>66022985
Yeah I know, I still hope in some pious soul to revive the spirit of communion and discussion RYM naturally offers.
what is it with every bjork fan on rym being the biggest fucking asshole?
>>66023002
OP here, am I an asshole? :(
>>66023012
are you a bjork fan?
>>66023065
I appreciate most of her work, yes.
Even if her last three albums were essentially shit.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~EtInArcadiaEgo
https://rateyourmusic.com/~I0000days
https://rateyourmusic.com/~fruitfork
https://rateyourmusic.com/~treeqt
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Pate
https://rateyourmusic.com/~regency
https://rateyourmusic.com/~chocol_te
https://rateyourmusic.com/~iloveyou
>>66023854
pumpis
gmorning, had some weird-ass dreams
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Synusoid
>>66023854
>EtInArcadiaEgo
kek
recommend music 1904~2016 to this Mexican hikikomori
https://rateyourmusic.com/~VinceTehMan
>>66023854
>prick
>idiot and stereotyped
>uses half ot his ratings
>angry teen
>doesn't know what he is listening to
>rates a 2016 album a 5/5
> gay or girl
>4400 and counting films watched
next
https://rateyourmusic.com/~SGwinn
>added more releases than AntiWarhol
>has way better aesthetics standars than him
>is cis-female
Avant-Queen.
>>66024144
if you liked Frances the Mute, why not try De-Loused in the Comatorium? It's more focused and Cedric's vocals are less obnoxious
is this the worst list on rym? https://rateyourmusic.com/list/Wingdman/conservatives_right_wing_libertarians_on_rym/
>>66024233
i'm genuinely curious as to why SGwinn hasn't been banned yet
not that i'm complaining, i love reading her posts. maybe the mods find her too entertaining to ban?
>>66024260
>I really hate socialism, lol.
>>66024288
why would she be? she's polite and mods are not, whatever /rym/ posters say, SJWs
>>66024307
>SJWs
EPIC bruh epic
>>66024321
try reading over the post again
>>66024328
why would she be? she's polite and mods are not, whatever /rym/ posters say, SJWs
recommend me more nuts right wingers on rym like SGwinn please
>>66024353
AntiWarhol
he's a blackfoot supremacist
http://www.last.fm/user/SGwinn
the scrobbles dont stop
https://rateyourmusic.com/~thehuntingparty
hello, good morning
https://rateyourmusic.com/~hladik
>>66024407
>Your compatibility with SGwinn is Very Low.
>You both listen to Oscar Peterson, McCoy Tyner and Marvin Gaye.
i am no worhty
>>66024220
>>rates a 2016 album a 5/5
were you born in le wrong generation?
>>66024435
oh darling save the last dance for me
>>66024455
great meme le wrong generation i watch filthy frank and go on reddit
>>66024455
of course not, but I think it's quite impulsive to rate an album which has been published just a few months ago as one of the greatest of all time
>>66024487
>implying rating should be objective
>implying rating could be objective
>>66024487
unless you're rating based on some other criteria than personal evaluation of quality, a few months is plenty of time to decide to give a 5 to a piece of music
>>66024530
>>66024608
I'm not contesting neither of your points. I just was thinking about the fact that I usually tend to rate an album a 5/5 only and solely when I can recognize it as an album I can't live without and has grown with me. I obviously do not know how much this person has listened to that album and how much his/her love for it has grown in those months, but I honestly doubt that in five, ten or twenty years he/she could still say "that's my album, that's what made me what I am as a listener"
https://rateyourmusic.com/~boldfaure
Lindsey Stirling is such garbage
>>66024659
yes, that's true and i agree with you, but most users use 5/5 differently (from what i've seen)
>>66024676
>not liking lindsey stirling
shes a quality guilty pleasure
Oh my b folks I've been on the bandwagon for a while
>>66024700
There's guilty pleasure and full sinful pleasure
>>66024743
>I don't like lindsey stirling
*tips fedora*
>>66024676
Hey boldfaure what are some classical red flags?
>>66024776
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/boldfaure/stag/classical+%28effectively+5.5%29/
>>66024785
Fuck off Montie/bkb
>>66024676
Your beatle ratings are fucking awful fix that please
>>66024796
I hate montie and I have no idea who bkb is
I've come here to rate you.
>>66022374
Pretty good taste.
>>66023969
Bad.
>>66024144
Horrible.
>>66024408
Average.
>>66024676
People who don't know about music think you are patrician/10
Also. decent.
>>66024776
One of the easiest tells for a classical hack is the pronounced presence of Sonorist or other "drone-classical" such as Feldman, Scelsi, Lachenmann, etc. It's good music, but if their 5*'s include a preponderance of these pieces then it indicates a limited comprehension and appreciation of classical music.
ALSO VERY IMPORTANT IS RECORDING CHOICE. Plenty of mainstream recordings are good but plenty of the RYM picks for classical recordings are bad.
>>66024800
Let's talk about it.
>>66024812
t. JackAnderson94
>>66024800
>>66024831
Going off of recording choice, any person who has the Arditti recording of Schoenberg's Quartet is total hack material riding off of Doc Perkins. In general, anything rated by Doc Perkins in their 5*'s is probably also hack material.
>>66024831
I still don't understand your anger against von Karajan. I find his conduction of Beethoven's symphonic works to be one of the most incredible and precise recordings ever produced.
>>66024831
>pronounced presence of Sonorist or other "drone-classical" such as Feldman, Scelsi, Lachenmann
Feldman, Scelsi and Lachenmann are some of the best classical composers and sound artirsts of all time.
>>66024855
what the fuck did you say about me you little shit
>>66024859
*REVIEWED by DP
bleh
>>66024865
I mean, have you heard the Kleibers, Klemperer, Furtwangler, and Toscanini? All these people I think produce recordings which are:
1. better performed
2. better conducted
Karajan's 60's cycle is decent and I have it rated as either 3.5 or 4.0 as a result, but outside of a few choice pieces/composers he's low-tier.
>>66024906
I may agree with you with the Toscanini one, but I found Kleiber's interpretation of thet Fifth to be quite excessive, and that says a lot if it is compared to a bombastic director as von Karajan is. Plus, I don't think anyone has ever expressed so clearly the distinct early romantic intuitions that could be found in his later works better than him. I also think that he can move pretty well when directing stuff composed between 1810-1890, because he has a deep understanding of what was going on with orchestras at the time.
I never heard Klemperer or Futwangler yet, what would you suggest?
>>66024859
What's wrong with Arditti's rendition of Schoenberg's quartets?
>>66024983
>but I found Kleiber's interpretation of thet Fifth to be quite excessive
lolwhat? It's very measured and extremely well paced, what are you talking about? There's a reason it's universally considered the gold standard for the 5th.
>Plus, I don't think anyone has ever expressed so clearly the distinct early romantic intuitions that could be found in his later works better than him.
Romanticism is only one part of the Beethoven equation. Equally important are, as previously mentioned, a great skill for pacing in works that often can be rather formally "ramble-y," a great sense of rhythmic energy, and expressiveness from the soloists. None of which I think Karajan has. Particularly not the rhythmic energy.
Here's Karajan's recording of the 6th which is highly acclaimed on RYM: https://open.spotify.com/track/11YigXaFNjzST4L0HAaFv3
Very smoothed over and focused on beauty, as with all Karajan recordings.
Now, somebody focused more on the energy of Beethoven, Zinman: https://open.spotify.com/track/1GVkDqOmyfAXEnTeXm8WKY
It's a Pastoral symphony, it's shepherd's dance and common pleasure. It's not some high art endeavor in the vein of Mahler.
>>66025007
Arditti excels in the performance of technically difficult music but is quite lackluster in the performance of expressive classical pieces like Schoenberg.
The thing RYM doesn't understand is that Schoenberg was firmly attached to the classical tradition along with Berg.
>>66025063
Is Boulez' Webern the best all around or are there better performances for specific pieces?
>>66025007
One of the very few releases that reassures me that I should go ahead rating music, if for nothing else for the simple reason that the activity of rating music is like dreaming: its real functions are not at all available to awareness, it is ontologically impossible to tell someone (even and principally to self) what was the dream about without lying, and the ‘stars’ you assigned, supposed to graphically indicate your appraisal, will become, in a couple of seconds, unbearable leftovers of a state of mind about which you could be hardly held responsible, so long ago – chronologically and existentially -- you committed those ‘stars’ to the album page through your computer screen, no matter if in minutes or centuries since punched the rate on your keyboard.
Listen to Arnold Schoenberg’s gospel according to the Ardittis.
>>66025091
I have to confess that I haven't heard much Webern outside of the Boulez set (on Sony. Though the DG one is more comprehensive).
The fact that there have been so few Webern recordings since is, I think, a testament to the impassibility of those sets.
>>66025122
review tubular bells
>>66025122
Oh, OK. What about the following Bach pieces:
Art of Fugue
Mass in B Minor
Well-Tempered Clavier
Matthaus-Passion
Cello Suites
>>66025145
I don't think i care enough to give it an honest shot desu
>>66025159
ffs man
>AOF
Angela Hewitt or Evgeni Koroliov
>Mass in B minor
Suzuki or Gardiner
>WTC
Hewitt, Aldwell, or Schiff (ECM)
>Matthaus
Richter, Rene Jacobs, or Herreweghe
>Cello Suites
ONLY Casals
>>66025091
>>66025159
>actually falling for memefaure's sophistry
HAHAHAH holy shit kill you're self
>>66025197
Show your picks for >>66025159
>>66025188
Based as fuck, thanks. Will check these out.
>>66025197
t. Montie
>when people try to call you out but are always clueless
>>66025207
koroliov, gardiner, richter, herreweghe, rostropovich
>>66025188
>>AOF
>Evgeni Koroliov, Keller Quartet
>>Mass in B minor
>Rene Jacobs
>>WTC
>Leonardth
>>Matthaus
>ONLY Herreweghe
>>Cello Suites
>Kuijken
fixed
>>66025321
That took you quite a while of searching in the charts. Let me know when you develop your own taste.
>>66025328
>Keller Quartet
>presumably Gustav Leonhardt
>ONLY Herreweghe
>Kuijken
I guess this is the avant-teen playbook but it's pretty bad.
>>66025328
>AOF
>Keller Quartet
Stopped reading there
>seriously talking with boldfaure
lmao. this fatass knows nothing about classical music and just repeats random phrases he has read in non-rym reviews
>>66025346
>That took you quite a while of searching in the charts. Let me know when you develop your own taste.
kek, 3 of these are the same as yours. whatever you say kid
I guess I've BTFO of Montie so many times that he's stopped using his trip? Haven't been here again because of bandwagon.
>>66025328
>>>Cello Suites
>>Kuijken
LITERALLY a meme recording.
I say this every night, every day, every afternoon, and it's so true.... boldfaure is a mess.
>boldfaure actually thinks he knows more about Bach than antigona
W E W
E
W
>>66025487
he doesn't but he knows that his opinions are enough for /rym/ lurking embryos
>>66025487
>>66025501
Which are Antigona's picks? I haven't gone to her profile.
>>66025543
t. embryo
>>66025579
t. pic
>>66025595
wdhmbt?
>>66022374
Daily reminder that MONTIE is better than BUMDIDDLER bolfag.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Montie_Ray
>>66025386
Montie is banned for 1 more day. He was also on vacation for 3 days without phone service. He will be back by tommorow
>>66024831
you don't know what Sonorism is.
>>66025608
how do i join montieboys?
>>66025637
I realize that those composers have a range of styles between them but I'm very well aware of what Sonorism is, certainly better than you.
>>66025637
he knows nothing, yet feels like he knows everything
>>66025653
Unfortunately if you're older than 18 then you're ineligible.
>>66025653
1. Message Montie on Skype. It's on his RYM
2. Make a trip and argue with Boldfaure.
3. Dislike mr bungles s/t
>>66025668
Is this classical essentially 5.5
>>66025685
No, never has been.
>classical (effectively 5.5)
what did "he" meme by this?
>>66025543
>AOF
Koroliov
>Mass in B minor
Jacobs
>WTC
Leonhardt
>Matthaus
Kuijken
>Cello Suites
Bylsma
also
>Johannes
Junghänel
>Goldberg
Hantai
>Sonatas/partitas
Podger
>Musical offering
Ricercar Consort
better than yours t b h desu
>>66025487
Fake-rating requires almost no knowledge entirely. Be honest, can you even read music?
>>66025884
Koroliov is good
Jacobs for Mass is OK
Leonhardt is unacceptable HIP bullshit
Kuijken for Matthew is a joke
haven't heard Jung whatever
>>66025063
>it's shepherd's dance and common pleasure
Beethoven philologists would fuck your ass with sand.
>>66026001
That's not a dig against pastoral works dumbo
>>66025966
>HIP is bad
one of the many reasons why your taste is unreliable
check out Junghänel though, he's mostly known for his Buxtehude
>>66026037
but Beethoven never considered it to be a pastoral work, even if the title mislead many critics. Also, >not Nikolayeva for Die Kunst
>>66026037
what's a good entry point to classical
>>66026043
HIP is OK for the orchestral works, Jacobs is HIP as fuck but he's also very musical.
HIP in keyboard works is unacceptable as there is no valid expressive alternative for piano.
>>66025966
what's wrong with Kuijken
>>66026065
>but Beethoven never considered it to be a pastoral
>"Scene by the brook" along with the other titles that are annoying to check on mobile
>>66026069
Let it happen naturally but don't rate things 5/5 when you barely understand them
I'm laughing at how little is substantiated in this "debate". Just "mine is better", without anything further, no elaborations, or anything else. I strongly doubt any of you know what you'r talking about. My advice: prove me wrong, or show something genuinely insightful.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~BrokenGeode
>>66026159
at least we are talking about something, instead of criticizing a behaviour which may be wrong, but constructive when discussing it.
desu at least we aren't discussing fucking personalities
we're at least focused on music
>>66026236
fuck off, these threads are for trash talk
>>66026320
and why should it be that?
Why shouldn't you talk about music instead?
Why do you have to be so aggressive based solely on the presence of some guys talking, in your vision, about nothing?
>>66024743
I thought we were finally free. This bumdiddler must die.
>>66024796
Nah, I'm good.
>>66024809
>I have no idea who bkb is
Lurk before you post newfag.
>>66025291
Doesn't matter when plenty of people who call you out aren't clueless.
>>66022374
how can you expect a thread to be good when you start it off with annoying memes that arent even funny
>>66026452
these were exploited in the first place to avoid people to find them funny. I do not consider any of the things I wrote in the OP as funny.
rp me on /rym/
well, jazz and classical do it for me, add to them a cup of avant-garde liquor and am happy!
>>66026524
literally the cancer of /mu/, now with 100% more summer
>>66026527
good, name a few names, so that you can be insulted by any member of the community
>>66026595
>calls out summerfags
>didn't even get my classic avant reference
>>66026081
>HIP in keyboard works is unacceptable as there is no valid expressive alternative for piano.
how is this allowed?
I only listen to my own music. Fucking plebs, how cuck do you have to be to like something someone else made (in your sphere)??
>>66026611
I'm sorry I do not care about this community's memes.
>>66026654
your and embryo
>>66026527
still cringe
>>66026638
Explain how the harpsichord is a valid alternative to piano.
>>66026527
Why is Astigmata so based?
>>66026697
When I was 14 on my first rym account he friended me after I gave Mauricio Kagel 5 stars
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Ricoshet777
I still love you, guys.
https://youtu.be/MSsnGJEZJMo
Lads, I'm about to listen to Julius Eastman for the first time and I have some questions. First of all, what does RE feel like and how do I know if I've reached it? Second, should I read our boy Tyler's review alongside the album or is it better to focus entirely on the music? Lastly, feel free to share any interesting RE stories or experiences! Thanks.
>>66026754
I could go on for days about what it feels like.
But I won't.
>>66026467
well it gives the wrong impression
i for one avoided many threads like these altogether because i knew they would suck
>>66026697
Why doesn't astigmata rate anything anymore? is he above assigning numerical values to pieces of sound art now?
>>66026754
>what does RE feel like and how do I know if I've reached it
have you confronted yourself and your self (as an ontological historical entity) with the mirror of atonality (as a mirror is not an empathic but a reflexive entity, alien to the space and time it reflects and only existing by itself in relation to the other) and realized the boundaries of human thought, comprehension and consciousness?
>yes
congratulations! you have reached rational ecstasy
>no
keep trying, kid.
I'm really sick of RYMers not knowing what atonal music is desu
>>66026817
He listened to so much modern classical he transcended music and became an omnipotent metaphysical entity
Are turkey hats necessary to reach RE or just an optional accessory?
>>66026972
>listens to Horatiu Radulescu once
>>66026683
because it can't be imitated by the piano
it's really that simple
https://rateyourmusic.com/~1000ratings
wdhmbt?
>>66027086
That's false, you can play piano without dynamics and with bad contrapuntal technique to mimic a harpsichord.
>>66027094
>Tracking every item that has at least 1000 ratings.
https://rymimg.com/lk/o/u/36ce13df3d7df9392f456057c5cccad4/6156876.jpg
wdhmbt?
>>66026875
Do you like atonal music? Are you tone deaf?
https://youtu.be/KbJI-tP6tNA
Also consider Angela Hewitt's own DVD on playing Bach on piano.
>>66027257
I have perfect pitch, which especially helps in picking out intervals in Serial works.
redpill me on ~holophylla
RP me on chumlum.
>>66027422
Used to be a professional avant-teen, but eventually moved away from music to continue his pursuit in videojuegos like a fuckin nerd. In the future (or even now, really) he will only be known by true old fags
https://rateyourmusic.com/~thedb
https://rateyourmusic.com/~thedb
https://rateyourmusic.com/~thedb
https://rateyourmusic.com/~thedb
https://rateyourmusic.com/~thedb
was not as impressed by the new GRIM as i'd hoped i'd be
>>66027422
weeb, possible pedo
>>66027525
wasn't he an OT/forum regular for a while as well?
>message domino records a month ago about redownloading Rock Bottom since I had a system restore and lost the files
>only now received it
wtf
foreign 78 rpm compilation (essentially 5.5)
>>66027953
Listen to the /mu/core chart and then meme at people who know more than you.
>>66027828
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/comp/various_artists_f2/longing_for_the_past__the_78_rpm_era_in_southeast_asia/
Giving this a 4.5 or a 5 will automatically grant you patrician status
>>66027953
people just pretend to like this person, right?
I visited his profile once, it was like reading a brain tumour
>>66028005
>Implying I didn't already have this on CD years ago
Awesome shit by the way. Get it.
i just realized every RYM review that isn't about music could start the way that one review of Click Dunkey found did: "I was thirteen when I first watched (heard) this. Already I'd gone through a whole lot."
they're always on some plain ass indie rock or "sad" music that goes perfectly with their young white dicks looking through rainy windows you spoiled fucks
>>66028005
> filled to the brim with insufferable vocals, out of tune instruments, bad sound quality (as you'd expect), and most importantly the music just isn't very good. You'd have to be from these countries to derive any sort of significance from this music.
tru that
>>66027953
One of the hottest /mu/ posters currently, BTFOs poseurs like boldfailure all the time.
>>66028105
>that "out of tune instruments" review is so goddamn sad. dude literally can't even fathom that there are non-western musical systems and yet finds it in himself to yell at people who like this.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~lechateux
good morning
https://rateyourmusic.com/~blackearth
https://rateyourmusic.com/~blackearth
https://rateyourmusic.com/~blackearth
boldfaure please review polly bradfield
>>66028729
There's nothing to review.
>>66027953
he's literally just some kid
>>66028743
explain
>>66028812
It's 40 minutes of improvisation using unconventional violin sounds.
I can't talk about form or harmony or melody, all I would have to say is "the concept wasn't new, Polly isn't good at improvisation, and half the people who like this are posers."
>>66028836
what makes somebody "good" at improvisation then? producing clean harmonious tones and melodies?
>>66028938
Improvisation isn't just mindless randomness, it's about creating new melody and ideas from nothing. Being a good improviser is being able to create a formal cohesion out of effectively nothing. All Polly does is random scratches.
>>66028938
Yes. See: Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, etc.
>>66025608
> What Burns Never Returns 1 star
are you even trying anymore
>>66028979
Great comment (effectively 5.5)
new thread at
>>66028978
>>66029047
This is only at 180 replies
>>66028979
Ahahahahaha holy shit. Stick to your classical music, buddy, because it's obvious that you know absolutely nothing about improvisation.
>>66029279
>>66029317
This lack of argument shows how blown the fuck out you are.
>>66029350
"never argue with stupid people. they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."
>>66029350
Why did you take your trip off? There's no argument to refute, you're clueless.
>it's about creating new melody and ideas from nothing. Being a good improviser is being able to create a formal cohesion out of effectively nothing
You're the kind of person who doesn't understand the difference between ECM shit like Keith Jarret and actual free improv.
>>66029427
You're the kind of person who doesn't seem to have an argument or understanding about improvisation.
>>66029378
>>66029427
Still with the lack of arguments. Keep name-calling, babe.
>>66028979
Does "formal cohesion" mean "something that I think sounds good"
>>66029427
>Keith Jarrett
>shit
PLEBBBBSSS LEAVEEEEE REEEE
>>66029462
>>66029509
Why should I bother arguing with someone who says that improvisation is about "melody" and "formal cohesion" without a single hint of irony? I guess your professors didn't teach you about free improv.
>>66029569
Please share the valuable information this guy taught you.
Hey guys give me 5*'s please
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1TqLtMsPWuk
>tfw cheatday
give me some good music
>>66029701
He is 100% correct, Montie.
>boldfaure is reporting posts making fun of him
lmao, who was btfo? at least we knows what triggers you, neckbeard
>>66029730
>le montie bogeyman
kek, he really did tear you a new one huh
>>66029757
Believe it or not I didn't report the post. I'm not that petty.
... *looks at shoes*
>>66029825
d-do you want to go to the taku sugimoto concert with me anon-kun?
>>66029884
nah i don't fuck plebs
>>66029884
y-you too.,,
>>66029884
>>66029908
cute samepost
>>66024144
nice
https://rateyourmusic.com/~kgoodsir
https://rateyourmusic.com/~LemurDemeanor
Haven't rated much yet
>tfw no avant-bf
>ywn be invited into Zizekian's reading group
JDIMSA
>>66030239
who's that
>>66030672
None other than RYM legend and noted avant-garde artist Claudio aka exitsense
>>66027749
why would you message the company to download a record you autist
>>66030787
He's a rich boy (I mean, he went to a prestigious music school so he must have a high paying job) therefore only legally buys his music as opposed to torrenting it for free
>>66030787
I bought a download from their store.
>>66030934
lol, any reasonable paying job can justify buying music.
Not my fault you're still a kid.
>>66031053
>buying digital music
>>66031053
t. 20-something year old still living with parents
>>66031053
>paying for mp3
How can someone be this cucked?
>>66031053
>working hours to earn money that is printed out of thin air
>spending money that is printed out of thin air to get digital copy of 1s and 0s that can be made out of thin air
Wow your prestigious music school must have not taught you anything about economics
>>66031053
wouldnt your earlier purchase justify torrenting it now?
>>66031121
>>66031142
physical music is unnecessary and wasteful desu. there's no point to cds,cassettes, and vinyl other than satisfying vapid material desire
>>66031053
>buying music
>buying digital music
lmao, what a bourgeois uncultured pleb
>>66031277
Not true, I need to support my idols.Idol CDs are definitely a necessity.
>>66031277
>wasteful
There's nothing more wasteful than paying for 1s and 0s that you can get for free and in higher quality on What.CD
rp me on ~Robo_Dobo
redpill me on ~AntiWarhol
>>66031352
donate money directly to them instead
>>66031364
I support labels via purchasing digital copies of albums that typically don't appear on what. for older albums of course use what.
Wait, charts now only list 50 albums per page and only 40 per year? What the hell is this bullshit?
cant believe how much of a cucked nu-male boldfailure is
>>66031408
I can't donate to Yuta. She's gone. I can only support her through royalties now.Gonna go buy more copies of Magical Symphonic Girl.
>Stop talking about me. You're no better than /mu/tants because you're clearly perpetuating uselnessnesses, pointlessnesses and meaninglessnesses. I'm a thing? cool to know. tell me more.
>I don't even want to be a "high profile RYMer". What does that even mean anyhow? Just because I don't post irrelevant random xd bullshit on a useless forum? I hate /mu/ as well, if anything, the fact that I'm talked about there disgusts me.
>Number of visits to AntiWarhol's RYM page*: 391330 - Am I a high profile RYMer yet? tell me when please.
>As much as I hate /mu/ and 4chan, at least that horrible and disgusting place is better than RYM's forum. RYM's forum has nothing good about it at all and all the users that post there often are nothing but obnoxious. I seriously hope sonemic sucks so I can just stop using this website and focus on my studies instead. I'm tired of being talked about when I say nothing to no one.
>I don't even know who you are and you post almost 30k message posts of nothing but pointless obnoxious bullshit. I just rate stuff and say nothing for the most part. I am a higher profile RYMer than you are and I don't even want to be. My e-penis is bigger than your e-penis. Do you care? I guess you do.
>Well, how am I "thing" and what's the point in talking about me in the first place then? Why care about that then if it's "not interesting"?
>If you have something to say, simply say it to me. I seriously have no idea why so many people talk about me when I literally talk to about 6 people here. It's quite strange and it literally makes no sense to me at all.
>I don't know who you are and I don't want to know who you are. If anything, you're far worse than anyone who frequents 4chan.
>Do you aspire to be a "high profile RYMer"? If so, why? I seriously want to know. Please tell me.
>Anyone who posts frequently on the RYM forums is the part of RYM I don't want to know at all. But please do tell me. I'm oh so interested in what a "high profile RYMer" is and isn't.
Name a better song released in 2016. Pro-tip: You can't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ljg5SkuXyM
>>66031517
wdhmbt
>>66031517
How can one man be this based???????? VargCasio utterly annihilated
>>66031517
This mf look like he work at Benihana
>>66031517
>I am a higher profile RYMer than you are and I don't even want to be. My e-penis is bigger than your e-penis.
holy shit, fucking DESTROYED
>>66031534
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSh5akaaHXk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpwG8f9nt4s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmNhfjzmMrU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcgT1eq3CLM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lb-t5hvu6Us
and these are just the obvious pop songs ;)
WHY THE FUCK DID THEY REMOVE 100 ALBUMS PER CHART PAGE
>>66031053
you're actually costing the record label money (in productivity loss) by messaging them for permission to dl the album when you can grab the same exact files from soulseek in a few minutes
>>66031517
his fucking hair lmao
>>66031517
>An extra pair of shoes and your angry eyes
>>66031651
nigga looks like a pineapple
>>66031517
Is that really Anti? Looks pretty decent desu, I'm surprised
>>66031671
how fat do you think he is?
>>66031517
>Be nice to one another. Life is short.
WDHMBT
>>66031625
>all corr shit
Dude, the kpop is rotting your brain. Save what little brain you have left and get out now.
>>66031716
famous last words...
>>66031687
from that pic i would guess he's skinnyfat but not overweight. he looks part asian so im assuming his cheeks are just naturally chubby
>>66031716
he was trying to be super mYsTeRIOuS with that.
He's so fucking lame
>>66031674
Yeah, he's actually pretty cute.
I have a thing for Aboriginal-Canadian guys, too.
>>66031793
fuck off AW
>>66031716
Funny because right before he change it to that his page said "How to passive-aggressive"
>>66031886
wdhmbt????
>ywn be avant enough to befriend Anti and trade recs with him
Music for this feel?
Damn all these people trying to BTFO boldfaure are so insecure and pathetic. You're just giving him more attention. Just let the man be
>>66031976
t. boldfaure
>>66031976
t. boldfaure
This is the most pathetic thread on /mu/ today.
>>66031961
li xianglan
>>66031976
Gee I wonder who's behind this one...
