>band claims to be post-punk
>is only punk
>band claims to be prog
>is actually emo
>>65858849
> The Mars Volta
>>65858849
muse
>band claims to be "just a rock n roll band"
>is some other subgenre of the wider rock music genre
>>65857355
>band claims to be good
>is only radiohead
aren't we all post punk roflmao :L
>singer claims to be post punk
>is jon the postman
>>65857355
why are proto and post punk so good, while actual punk is boring af
I mean The Velvet Underground vs Ramones vs Talking Heads
>>65859036
>who cares what we are? we just wanna RAWK!!!
I fucking hate this shit.
>>65859088
>proto
Actually bold and experimental for its time.
>post
Changing up the very slim punk sound by introducing outside ideas.
>>65859088
I'd say Wipers are good but they kinda straddle the line between post-punk and punk
post-hardcore and hardcore punk are pretty good imo
>>65859088
I totally agree that proto and post punk and more interesting but how do you not like any punk if you are a fan of those genres? I get that it's less varied but there is still some great stuff out there. Ever try wire's pink flag, that's a great album that toes the line of punk and post punk.
>>65859534
>wire's pink flag, that's a great album that toes the line of punk and post punk.
Pink Flag isn't even remotely post-punk. Compare it to 154 or Dome discography, Document and Eyewitness even mocks this by only playing ten seconds of 12XU and then playing nothing but post-punk pleb filters.
Chairs Missing is the one that blurs the line between punk and post-punk.
