Guise, does this still hold?
/mu/core should have another row to it. Also both Radiohead albums don't need to be there.
>>65853123
nope
>>65853149
I just bought The Devil and God are Raging Inside Me from Amazon for 6 bucks brand new; did I do good? I mean I'm almost sure you guys love this album, right?
>>65853149
Is there any particular reason there isn't a classical section? /classical/ is a bigger community than /jazz/ although mind, this doesn't exactly represent /jazz/'s taste very well so maybe being accurate to /mu/'s tastes wasn't the point?
damn is that from 2011? Not really.
>>65853149
shit
>>65853149
>>65853147
I"m trying to become more hip cause my best friend is big into /mu/ and he says that what I normally listen to is crap (listen to old 1999-2008 Tiesto, Paul Oakenfold, Paul Van Dyk, Gabriel and Dresden, Maor Levi, Ronski Speed, some of the newer electronic 'DJ's such as Deadmau5, Alesso, Nero, Brillz, Snails, Ookay, Lookas, etc)
>>65853195
You don't have to if you don't enjoy the music. All of us are here because we liked it (I hope).
>>65853123
it's all fantastic-decent stuff so just skim around a bit
>>65853149
>tpab
>core
dropped.
>>65853195
>I"m trying to become more hip cause my best friend is big into /mu/ and he says that what I normally listen to is crap
What an awful reason to listen to music. If you aren't genuinely enjoying all this new stuff you're planning on listening to, you're not spending your time well.
>>65853179
there are many changes I'd like to make to that chart (I didn't make it originally). Classical would be a good addition, though I feel this chart in particular covers that.
>>65853221
>>65853207
I'm being harsh with his words; he didn't call it "crap" but he said I could be listening to different music. I'm just easily offended, and too pleasing. Plus, I don't mind listening to new music, as long as it isn't bad. So since you guys are the 'perts in this field, I'm just coming to you for advice, because you're all snobs (think the movie High Fidelity)
>>65853149
most of the stuff in p4k-core are not even p4k-core
>>65853195
Who cares what a jackass. Be yourself, except drop Tieso.
Anyway. You might like Fatboy Slim and the Chemical Brothers. Maybe Tipper, too.
>>65853248
the way we're going, we might as well add a rym core section. Neither are really needed. There's no reason to include a "consensus among those other people" portion, is there? Make a seperate chart.
>>65853286
True, agreed anon. You're right. We should do so. Combine RYM and P4K together.
>>65853239
Nobody ever posts this chart though. Not enough indie rock.
>>65853246
Well, obviously start with Aphex Twin and Autechre if that's where you're coming from. If you like either then great, but if not just keep listening to your old stuff. /mu/tants that go around acting holier than thou are the worst.
>>65853313
But they're the ones who know the most about the genres presented. I want to be as knowledgeable as John cusacks character in High Fidelity
>>65854517
have you listened to this yet
>>65854535
No friend, is it good? To be honest I'm an electronic music festival attendee where I go to all stages and love listening to my favorite artists.
one chart to rule them all
>>65854813
if you listen to one electronic music album, that is the one to listen to.
>>65853195
sounds like you are young and should educate yourself on some better dance music eventually
>>65855293
that electronic list sucks. this bleeps selection is better >>65853149
>>65855565
I'm 25 and I've been listening to tiesto, Paul oaken fold, PVD, Sasha and John dig weed since 98-99 when my cousin introduced it to me. Just been adding artists to listen to since
>>65855582
Dont listen to much electronic so I wouldnt know
>>65855598
yeah sasha and digweed is fine progressive house, for what it is.
but you miss out if you only listen to pop stuff like that and don't delve into techno and so on.
>>65853195
Are you me dude. I used to be super into Trance a couple years ago but then i got here and started listening to other types of music. Start with post rock. Explosions in the Sky or Godspeed!
>>65853239
This is only impressive until you look closer.
>>65853149
literally why the fuck is Fabulous Muscles there when the essential Xiu Xiu album is A Promise.
>>65853149
>Faith/Void
>Attributed to only Void
>Even having them on that list
Its not entry level punk
>>65853239
Why does this chart insist I listen to compilations?
Thats literally the worst form of music distribution
>>65853164
It's a good album.
>>65853123
>TMV
>Pitchfork-core
I think its p good to show entry level /mu/s taste tho
>>65856737
lol
>>65853248
p4k-core = albums from 1990>
>>65853149
>>65853149
only flaw with this one is that there is no sub /mu/core section
ok computer, SAW 85-92, funeral, pinkerton, madvillainy, in the court of the crimson king, sunbather, illinois (which should probably be in the top core instead of trout mask replica t b h), hospice, the soft bulletin, the velvet underground & nico, tago mago, the lonesome crowded west, and good kid maad city could all fit in there.
>>65857274
p4k-core is just sub/mu/core+p4kcore+rymcore
>>65853149
Why does metal get it's own section when other, objectively better genres don't have their own section? It's literally overweight basement dwellers screaming about satan and their angst and shredding scales up and down. Music for children.
>>65859517
It's mostly just containment so you can ignore it, same with hiphop.
>>65853123
Holy shit this chart came out before The Smile Sessions that blows my mind for some reason
>>65859206
? not taken seriously without aeroplane as number one not even looking at the rest of this shit chart.
