>tfw you really like an album but it's below a 7.0 on pitchfork and you really are just a misguided pleb so you delete it to be safe
feels bad. i hate when that happens
damn...
>>65852263
Kill yourself my man
dumb frogposter
better to be safe than sorry. wouldn't want to listen to an album that isn't absolutely perfect.
>tfw you really like an album but it's below a 7.0 on pitchfork and you don't give a fuck because you're confident in your own ability to critique music
feelsgoodman
>>65852263
i bet pitchfork would give your life a 1.7
>>65852273
>>65852278
>>65852288
i'm trying to improve my music taste...
>>65852297
absolute perfect isn't needed but i want to listen to things that intelligent, respected music critics at least give a c-!
and it makes me feel so dumb when i don't even know what's good
>>65852322
yeah, my music taste is pretty bad. i'm trying tho
>>65852344
If you want to improve your music taste, ignore shitfork acquire music that you like.
>>65852344
You sound pathetic
Just fucking listen to what you like
Who gives a shit if critics like it or not
>tfw don't use critics but don't enjoy music that much anyways
Gonna be honest I did that with OK Go too. I was obsessively double checking my opinions with Pitchfork's to see if mine was "right". Years ago....
honestly pitchfork writers have pretty bad taste. only things they are right about most of the time are universally hated or loved albums.
