>get me brian eno on the phone
sir he's busy experimenting by fusing pop and electronics and changing the notion of the pop song
>alright get me lou reed on the phone
sir he's busy inventing genres with his band TVU
>FUCK okay find me someone that emulates the two and waters it down for the unwashed masses
got u senpai
>>65781314
Bowie is god
>brian eno
>""""""""""""experimenting""""""""""""""""""
>lou reed
>"""""""""""""""""""""""inventing"
l m a o
m
a
i
>>65781314
nah u
David Bowie never claimed to be an innovator, he just made GOAT pop music.
Sorry you're 2newfag2see that.
>>65781314
Are you retarded? This album is more like The Rolling Stones than Brian Eno and Lou Reed
>>65781468
so this is our new proge mon?
>>65781504
Pretty sure proge mon was a newtrip/fag himself
>>65781314
>literally close friends with both lou reed and brian eno
>they both influence him
>"waters it down"
he was always a pop artist, he was just influenced by those he surrounded himself with.
>>65781504
I miss proge, at least he wasn't as big of an avant-teen as this one.
>>65781541
What is avant teen supposed to mean in my case?
>>65781523
why are you saying that as an excuse? if you're a musician and you're heavily influenced by other musicians to the point where it's extremely obvious then you need to off yourself because you have nothing of worth to give to anybody that has already listened to your influences
i have nothing against pop music, but bowie is a trend hopper that made very boring pop music.
>>65781552
>bowie is a trend hopper that made very boring pop music.
He's a trend-setter who made very good 'pop' music.
>>65781552
>if you're heavily influenced by others you need to off yourself
>>65781552
I'M HIT
>>65781552
>you need to off yourself because you have nothing of worth to give to anybody
freudian slip
>>65781552
>every musician everywhen is worthless
>>65781471
Yeah, OP is confusing me. Bowie had albums that were clearly influenced by Eno. The ones he worked on with Eno.
>>65781552
>you share your board with people like this
>>65781700
>surprised at contrarian highschoolers on /mu/
>>65781468
>>65781762
Journalists saying he is an innovator doesn't mean Bowie claimed to be an innovator.
>>65781762
>5 articles of non-music journalists talking about music
>1 article (NME) quoting The Who
You're dumb.
>>65781790
I mean, everyone got that idea out of their ass?
>>65781799
>The Who aren't musicians
haha ok tripfriend!
>>65781832
They got it from the fact that he WAS an innovator, not from repeating a claim Bowie made himself.
>>65781832
summer is just getting started. buckle in for more autism
>>65781832
Seems you didn't read the post you had originally replied to either. >>65781468
>>65781870
>implying
>>65781851
I know! That's what I'm saying! see: >>65781468
>>65781552
agree 100% desu
true
