/mu/, your favorite band makes a new album. It is 3x better than the best one they've put out. But the rest of their albums never existed. That will be their only album, and nobody will know that those albums existed or remember them. Would you do it?
No, they have too many good albums.
>>65745310
psh of course
I may as well I guess
>>65745310
the prospect of an actually flawless Beatles album is thrilling but they have a bunch that are close and also singles are the superior format anyway so
>no
No.
>>65745310
This is difficult
do MBV's EPs count?
if mbv was an indication something 3x better than Loveless would likely be in the same vein just infinitely superior
I would really miss sometimes and when you sleep though
>>65745338
Yes. All releases count.
>>65745310
3x better than loveless?
That's worth wiping out the entire genre desu.
>>65745310
Yes, I prefer quality over quanity.
>>65745310
I would do it for keks desu
Since there's no way to sample before doing so, no.
>Radiohead is my fav band
>almost all albums are really good, and none are truly bad
>I even genuinely like Pablo Honey
>don't care how overrated they are
>bring the hate you snobby pricks
>25yo American so no I didn't really grow up with them as part of Britpop or some shit
Honestly, DOOM would be good. he'd gain the recognition he deserves and I'd get a DANK album
and I could still listen to quasimoto
>>65747045
But... but mm food would be lost... hoe Cakes and One Beer... gone forever...
That album would be earth shattering tho
