/experimental/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
Hello friends, this is a thread for experimental music discussion. To clarify: Noise, drone, electroacoustic, free improvisation, futurism, indeterminacy, musique concrete, sound collage, and all that good stuff.
What have you been listening to? What have you been making? Movie and literature recommendations, concert experiences, gear, etc. are all welcome
What even is experimental. This is marked experimental on bandcamp. So wtf?
I would like to set out a clear yet general definition of experimental music in this thread.
been listening to a lot of radiohead lately. crazy
>>65713802
Anything that isn't pop/indie/metal/hip-hop
you know this is the worst idea for a general on this board right? this is somehow worse than kpop general
>>65713802
It's really just a generic catch all term at this point. But I can't really think of a better word to use for the generals so it remains, I'm not gonna title the general "Noise, drone, electroacoustic, free improvisation, futurism, indeterminacy, musique concrete, sound collage, etc.", plus the term annoys some people which is funny.
>>65713877
>Kpop general sympathizing
You have to go back.
>>65713677
>>65713877
>>65713924
>>65713967
it really is though. "experimental" is the biggest umbrella term in music. fucking miley cyrus and her dead petz is "experimental" kid cudis last album was "experimental" you could say beyonces latest album was experimental because she had a country track on there. it's retarded, like the term IDM
>>65713842
>>65713895
Hm.
Im not a fan of these definitions.
Let's just say experimental music pushes the boundaries of what can be considered "music." Additionally, experimental music employs some sort of novel or non traditional technique. At a point in the past, Id say hip hop was experimental, but it has become tradition now.
>>65714074
This isn't constructive to creating a working definition. If all you are gonna do is bitch, please leave.
Can we go a single thread without arguing over the fucking definition of experimental, please? Just post some fucking music (or nonmusic) or whatever
http://youtu.be/oO8HrG2h9pA
This is what I've recently been listening to, really cool concept actually
>>65713841
Dude they are crazy experimental, nice choice. Listen to pic related, it's an obscure experimental masterpiece :0
>>65714396
Cancer
>>65714396
>he thinks obscure = experimental
o i am laffin
>>65714396
Great taste you have, I assume you never heard of this band they are pretty underground but really good and experimental unlike most hip hop which is trash.
>>65714439
underrated
Experimental dub.
also very good dub
also very good noise
a masterful album indeed.
>>65714727
I don't get why that's so expensive on discogs, the label has it for $10 still, I guess people are too stupid to look outside of discogs. I gotta get that along with the shirt sometime.
https://caminanterecordings.bandcamp.com/album/merzdub
>>65714804
fuck, I just realized the download I have has the tracklist out of order.
mad.
Stop making these piece of shit threads.
>>65717176
you first
>>65717176
Who let you out of your containment board.
>>65713677
>>65714129
Wrong, his post establishes that all attempts to create a working definition of "experimental" will end in pseudery since the term signifies more about its user than the music it describes. His post dissuades people from calling music "experimental" and hopefully inspires them to be better, more intelligent, and less shallow people, making it highly constructive for music discussion on this board.
>>65717280
The term is good enough, you people nitpick too much.
A general rule for these threads should be to not partake in meta discussion. Do not feed the trolls.
>>65717239
These threads are garbage no matter what sort of mental gymnastics you try to engage in in order to shrug off anyone pointing out the fact.
Not only is the entire basis of the threads flawed as fuck, none of the people posting in them even have any idea about any of the potential subjects that could get discussed here beyond a handful of the most entry-level albums or artists(and even with those the level of contextual and historical relevance of those artists in the wider sphere of "experimental" music is something nobody has any idea about; the familiarity with the hows, whys and whats regarding any of this shit begins and ends with downloading the album and maybe seeing how it's rated on RYM).
It's the exact same shit as /noise/ was. /noise/ didn't deserve to exist because it was shit, because none of its posters had any idea about noise.
/experimental/ doesn't deserve to exist either, for the exact same reason.
Stop making these threads.
Also, hurling shit at these threads has now become a meme. It should not be encouraged by engaging with these posters in any way.
>>65717461
I'm not gonna stop posting them as it's hilarious how butthurt some people get over them, and people occasionally post interesting music.
>>65717490
I like to hurl shit back... I guess I could refrain. Anyway, this some good ish too.
>>65717490
It's funny to see how offended they get by these threads, which is partially why I keep posting them.
>>65717447
Oh yes, don't let yourselves get distracted from all this rich discussion by the "trolls"(learn what that fucking term is supposed to mean, dipshit).
"Hey, this Merzbow album sure is good!"
"I agree! It sure is good!"
"Is noise rock experimental?"
"Hey, check out this Soundcloud noise track that I slapped together in Audacity in 20 minutes!"
"Is Animal Collective experimental?"
Truly, the "trolls" are ruining a great thing here.
I know these threads are basically attempts to get spoonfed, but for those attempts to be successful you first have to find someone who knows enough about this shit(tough) and is willing to overlook your total dilletantism and deliberate lack of self-sufficiency(very tough). How fucking hard can it be to just look for shit on your own?
>>65717520
I'm not really expecting you to stop posting them, even without the shitflinging that goes down here the threads just aren't sustainable and will deflate and die soon enough because of a lack of content or a consistent and knowledgeable crowd of regular posters. If anything, people coming in here to tell you what a piece of shit these threads are is one of the main things keeping them alive.
>>65717671
hey just a reminder to not reply to this guy
I repeat, DO NOT reply to this poster
>>65717544
>>65717632
Some people actually want to discuss music here. You should keep your ego on its leash and refrain from engaging in these inane debates. I'm not responding to any more meta from now on
>>65717711
Ok, post music then. What do you want to talk about?
>>65717783
Anyone familiar with the Wandelweiser group? I've been really inspired by the work of Manfred Werder recently.
>>65717783
Good joke, he doesn't want to talk about music he just wants to post the same argument over and over in every thread.
>>65717843
No, please describe what kind of music they are.
aside from "experimental," since the term encapsulates so much.
>>65717876
I'm not spoonfeeding you, look it up yourself.
why is 70s free improv so much better than eai
>>65717876
It comes from the Western art music tradition. Heavily inspired by the music and ideas of John Cage. I'm not into all of it. Some I don't find to be very groundbreaking but Werder's stuff is very conceptually interesting for me.
>>65717925
Drugs
>>65717925
Eh a lot of 70's free improv leaves me cold, I like more eai overall.
>>65717706
You not replying to my posts doesn't make any of the things stated in them any less true.
These threads are dogshit and they will remain dogshit for the rest of their existence.
>>65717896
Not me. Someone else
>>65717996
Hey, don't reply to this guy!
>>65717976
Agreed on that. I really can't get into stuff like Derek Bailey. Evan Parker's stuff is good for a time but it doesn't captivate me very long. I feel like the general aesthetics in free improv have become a lot more advanced in later decades.
>>65718005
Well I did look them up, and I'm listening to:
Eva-Maria Houben
Air – works for flutes and organ
And this is some really nice stuff. Droning flutes, a subtle background warble of sorts, occasional nature noises. This is right up my alley. Thanks my guy
>>65717996
>My posts are dogshit and they will remain dogshit for the rest of their existence.
FTFY.
>>65717976
What is it about 70s free improv that leaves you cold? Where does it fail?
What gives EAI the upper hand in the comparison?
>>65718046
Thanks for the reply, big boy.
>>65718084
Well, that goes without saying.
>>65718083
Cool I haven't heard that I'll have to check it out
>>65718106
SERIOSLY GUYS, Stop replying to this guy! lmao!
>>65718063
>derek bailey and evan parker
meh. i'm way more into AMM, taj mahal travellers, theatre of eternal music sort of stuff
i really think what bailey and parker did for improvisational music is overstated personally, by people that don't want to admit coltrane had already freed music from most of those confines already, i suppose because it makes you look like a cliche
>>65718130
Posting experimental hip hop.
So...
/noise/ generals are dead now I see. Fucking underage retards with shit taste killed it.
>>65718091
>What is it about 70s free improv that leaves you cold? Where does it fail?
It sounds more traditional and jazz based and not as daring vs a lot of eai, I do like some 70's free improv, Schwarzwaldfahrt is my favorite 70's free improv album.
>>65718106
He greentexted your post which means he meant your comments are shit, how new are you?
>>65718174
Instead of whining you can post about noise here.
>>65718174
im pretty big into guitar/electronic noise but i never felt welcome in those threads myself so i dont think its as simple as you want it to be
hey check out this tape rip i found on youtube of the same shit weve already heard a thousand times
>>65718159
neat.
>>65718151
I haven't listened to any of that stuff actually. I'll have to check it out. I think Brotzmann is more potent than either Parker or Bailey as well even though he's more just straight up free jazz. There's a great energy in his playing. I don't know if it was different at the time but by today's standards Bailey sounds like an amateur improviser, someone who's only just discovered improv music
>>65718174
I always felt bad for the few dudes in /noise/(and it really was just a few, like less than a handful) who clearly knew their shit when it came to noise and kept trying to make those threads better, though I also never really understood where they got the good will to keep hanging around those threads considering how fucking braindead and worthless everyone else in them was. That general was mistake from day one, in all honesty.
>>65718197
What the fuck, are you retarded? It was a joke, you autistic fuck.
>>65718159
>>65718220
wait, I take that back. Someone seems to have just clipped wooshy sine waves
>>65717843
Did you hear this one? It's one of my favorites on the label.
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/multiple/on_foot__brooklyn/
>>65718304
You didn't listen long enough.
>>65718220
>>65718304
It's a faggot who's been viraling himself in these threads ever since they began. Just ignore him.
I wanted to get something that sounds 100% original so after about a year of meaningless beatmaking and playing around with samples I'm learning maxmsp and actual music theory and sound synthesis bit by bit from googling and shit. Also reading musical application of microprocessors and starting electric engineering this fall
What will help me to gain more understanding on basis of sound making and true experimental music? Am i on the right track? Am I just retarded? I'm young and have a lot of time, I want to accomplish something
>>65718304
What is it? An album you found?
>>65718063
> feel like the general aesthetics in free improv have become a lot more advanced in later decades.
What the fuck does that even mean. Kill yourself you worthless avant-teen scum.
>>65718298
>Calls me autistic, yet constantly gets offended by these generals enough to keep replying to them over and over
>>65718371
He's right though.
>>65718335
I haven't. Is it a field recording album? I've been working through the Wandelweiser box set but otherwise I've just been more focusing on Werder's releases and extending from there. I'm appreciating the recommendations.
>>65718410
They play music outside so it has field recordings in it along with what they are playing.
>>65718336
still, it was pretty unimaginative as far as noise goes.
>>65718373
>over and over
This was like the 2nd or 3rd time I posted in one of these, I'd hardly call it "over and over". Like I said, the bitching about the quality of these threads plays a large part in keeping them alive and I really don't want to prolong their lifespan anymore than is necessary.
And I dunno mate, between your inability to pick up on obvious jokes and your devotion to making these threads not in spite of but because some people have a problem with them, I'd say that you come out of this as the considerably more autistic person. Maybe even genuinely autistic.
>>65718341
I think setting out with the goal of trying to make the most experimental thing ever is flawed to be honest. Just focus on making good music which you can appreciate. Whether it's experimental or not is kinda secondary
>>65718454
>This was like the 2nd or 3rd time I posted in one of these, I'd hardly call it "over and over"
My of these posts are suspiciously similar to each other, it sounds like the same two or three people at most who get offended by these threads enough to keep replying to them over and over.
>>65718444
I disagree. It's not to everyone's tastes.
The long lost album by The Gerogerigegege, called Piano River leaked recently!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSSGi0Or9yk
Its...not very good. Like, it is good source material if you want to make a mix or plunderphonics but it certainly gets boring after a while I find.
>>65714727
What the fuck? I didn't know how much I needed this in my life until now. Aside from Merzbeat and Merzbient, does he have any other noise fusions?
>>65718510
too bad about gero being boring. I found the new album to be 3/4 boring as well
If anyone's interested in music on the extreme conceptual, Cagean end of the spectrum check out a release called 'regel #5 (classical music)' by a group called Regler.
>>65718341
Nobody who had a clue about "experimental" music would ever set out to make something "100% original", nor would they even believe that making something 100% original to be possible.
Let me guess, you've heard a few dozen "experimental" music albums in your life, you wouldn't be capable of writing an intelligent essay on any of them, and you have come to the conclusion that you prefer making "experimental music" to actually listening to it?
It's always funny to scroll through one of these threads(or /noise/ in the past), check out all the Bandcamp or Soundcloud links in them and realize how obvious it is that next to none of the people who are so eager to self-promote their shit here actually have a clue about the genres they are working in or even seem to be active listeners and explorers of them.
>>65718479
Mhm. I've got nothing to say regarding that.
Have you considered the possibility of there being a grain of truth to the things people are disparaging these threads for if all their claims are so consistent with each other? Have you considered the possibility of these threads simply being shit?
>>65718635
HEY
DO
NOT
REPLY
TO
THIS
GUY
>>65718479
And do you see, dude? Almost 100 posts in this thread so far! You should be grateful for the meta shit.
>>65718552
Yeah I gotta agree for the most part. Out of Saiga is a nice dark ambient piece, the self-titled track is texturally pretty good, but not very good aside from that. Final tuning is very creepy at parts. It's just that Sea of Losers is so quiet, long and boring that it kills most of the album for me. I fucking love the cover of the album though.
>>65718635
I don't just mean that the posts are consistent, I mean the way they are written is very similar in style to each other, it's definitely just the few same people posting over and over with the occasional extra person coming in.
>>65718580
>Nobody who had a clue about "experimental" music would ever set out to make something "100% original", nor would they even believe that making something 100% original to be possible.
Was that not often the point behind some of the stochasticism/indeterminacy movements?
>>65718676
It's funny that the people who are offended by these threads keep bumping them and giving them more replies. Maybe they aren't actually annoyed by these threads at all and are just trying to bump the threads.
this thread's a barrel of laughs.
>>65718174
the death of /noise/ is no great loss and it should have happened a long time ago.
the concept of a general thread in which nobody knows anything about the subject of the general is moronic beyond words in itself. the concept of a general in which nobody knows anything about its subject and isn't even interested in learning is fuck, i don't even know, but that's what /noise/ was.
it was a garbage general. probably the worst general on here that was allegedly devoted to actual discussion of music rather than just the discussion of pop personas or social media or whatever.
>>65718734
>Maybe they aren't actually annoyed by these threads at all and are just trying to bump the threads.
im with that other guy, you might be legit autistic.
>>65718829
Thanks for the bump friend! I appreciate your dedication to keeping these threads alive!
>>65718864
kys, you freak
How many times does it need to be said you morons. Do not feed the trolls.
>>65718896
Thanks son! Love you too! See you after school,
-Mom
What does /experimental/ think of this? Does it live up to the hype brought by Frozen Niagra Falls? I think its one of the better noise releases this year.
>>65718902
this
>>65718580
>It's always funny to scroll through one of these threads(or /noise/ in the past), check out all the Bandcamp or Soundcloud links in them and realize how obvious it is that next to none of the people who are so eager to self-promote their shit here actually have a clue about the genres they are working in or even seem to be active listeners and explorers of them.
lmao, "noise by people who don't know anything about noise" pretty much seemed to be the concept of that awful bandcamp noise compilation that /noise/ put together last winter(and that for some reason triggered a massive autistic meltdown which in retrospect was probably the thing that put the final nail in /noise/'s coffin)
and i almost shit myself laughing a couple weeks back when some guy asked people for recommendations on good 2016 noise in a thread and the only guy who responsed to him went "well i don't know anything about that, but here's a split i put out this year".
can't make this shit up, you really can't.
>>65713718
"I like real experimental music! Death grips, Anco, the list goes on!"
>>65719561
I find these posters more unbearable than actual DG or AnCo fans. You are just being negative fr no reason.
>>65719600
Found the Death Grips fan.
>>65719654
oh no! !
You caught me!
What of it?
>>65719875
I am glad to see that /advanced/ changed their name to /experimental/. This is something I fundamentally like
>>65718341
>I wanted to get something that sounds 100% original
>I'm learning actual music theory
>>65720081
What was /advanced/?
Daily reminder to worship your master.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~AntiWarhol
>>65720081
Dude Oasis lmao.
Great thread. Way to muddy up the reputation of experimental music even more with your underaged inability to stop fucking replying to trolls. Every fucking one of these threads is going to be the same shit - just as every one of them since you started making them was. You retards ruined one of the only places on this shitty board that wasn't filled to the brim with shit. Fuck all of you.
more based merzbow collabs
>https://caminanterecordings.bandcamp.com/album/tranz
>>65722217
pretentious whore
>>65722217
Post about experimental music or shut the fuck up.
These threads need more mega links, I miss all those easy noise scoops.
>>65724049
Why not post some yourself instead of expecting them to be spoonfed to you.
>>65724746
I posted
>>65718172
>>65717544
>>65714727
>>65713802
>>65722956
I expect to be "spoonfed" back.
>>65719212
There were some decent artists on that comp. I actually expected it to be a lot worse.
How many of you fuckers are nihilists?
>>65713718
>experimental
>noise,drone
>merzbow pic
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH MY SIDES ARE GONE
>>65714074
well beyonce's album was pop, even with the country track
and we, like all right-minded people, prefer the album. probably. let's just say experimental is non-pop
>>65714367
that album's just very boring to me.
i prefer this album (compilation), shows off lowercase's prettier aspects. find it if you can
>>65717461
i wanna post a music though
>>65718896
wth
>>65724792
None of those are mega links.
>>65725703
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH you aren't funny, kys.
>>65726587
He's right, most Ebin Harsh Noise music is trash made by people with no original thoughts.
>>65726701
well that's what makes it Ebin. that's some circular logic you got there
Anyone heard the latest Valerio Tricoli?
would be cool to discuss some new releases
>>65717925
I've always felt like it's the other way around, actually
>>65718244
>amateur
dude you're about to blew it with this sentence.
Are you implying Bailey's an amateur? I don't think hw sounds like one. And even less in the field of free improv. , name one other guitarrist that uses this style and sounds more fluid than his.
Anyone have any relevant essentials charts they can share?
>>65727615
Essentials charts are cancer and have played a large part in making this board shitty.
They enable laziness and dabbling("I've heard 20 albums from this genre that I saw on an arbitrarily assembled context-free chart on 4chan! This means I now know everything there is to know about this genre and there's no need for me to actually look further into it or learn how to find more of it on my own!"), they provide no perspective on the genres or artists they are devoted to that would allow any potential listeners to actually be capable of historically framing those genres or artists in a way which would allow for a clear and educated perspective on why they are significant or worth listening to in the first place, they gentrify taste and encourage a one-dimensional and simplistic mindset in which art as a whole is approached.
Do your own fucking research and stop begging people to spoonfeed you.
I have a medieval gauntlet. Should I slap a contact mic on that motherfucker?
>>65727615
This one is cool. I've found some good music from it. lol at all these people parroting the word "spoonfeeding".
>>65727812
>lol at all these people parroting the word "spoonfeeding".
that word seems pretty apt to be used in these threads desu, the consistency with which nothing but the most entry-level of entry-level shit gets posted here makes me think that all the people participating in them have only been exposed to the concept of "experimental music" very recently(and possibly simply through downloading a bunch of albums from a sharethread here, which is legit one of the worst possible ways to discover new music, much less entire new worlds of music) and are posting here in hopes of someone (brace for it!)spoonfeeding them further(little do they know that everyone here is as ignorant as everyone else lmao).
I'm into experimental and alternative music.
>>65727709
Was it really necessary to frame your argument within an unprovoked, inflammatory attack? Chill with your elitist projections dude, I've never encountered anybody who uses essentials charts to the ends you've described, and honestly, I doubt you have either - you just assume such people exist in order to feel superior. Nobody ever tried to claim that essentials charts are some sort of ultimate authority on the objectively best works within a given genre., nor that they're all that's necessary to have an in-depth understanding of a genre of music. You'd have to be incredibly naive to think that was the case. While some charts are shitty, the good ones tend to be collections of widely-celebrated/culturally significant/accessible releases from a given genre, and when you're totally new to something they can be a really solid entry point.
Regardless, you aren't the arbiter of how people ought to go about discovering and experiencing music. It's good enough to listen to something because you like how it sounds - "being capable of historically framing genres or artists in a way which would allow for a clear and educated perspective on why they are significant or worth listening to in the first place" might provide YOU personally a richer appreciation of music, but it's not necessary.
Maybe I'm wrong, but you seem to be wary of people plucking albums from essentials charts just to tick them off their patrician checklist and add to their intellectual/hipster cred, and are condemning that use of music as a means of feeling more cultured than people who aren't familiar with that music rather than really endeavouring to having a "deeper" understanding of the music. And yet you're doing the exact same thing, you've just added an extra layer of arbitrary intellectual appreciation in order to be in the cool club that really "gets" it.
>>65728263
>I've never encountered anybody who uses essentials charts to the ends you've described
>Nobody ever tried to claim that essentials charts are some sort of ultimate authority on the objectively best works within a given genre
this whole board does that desu
if we were going by your suggestion that charts here are used purely as an entry point from which people can jump off on their own(which actually isn't true at all: anyone capable of jumping off into a genre on their own would be capable of doing that from the get-go as soon as they discovered that genre's existence, they wouldn't need a 4chan chart to show them the path lel), would you not expect that by now the general /mu/ taste would be far more varied and expansive and clued in than it actually is?
would you not expect all those people begging for recommendations "to get them started" to have by now branched off into whatever interests them on their own and then expose others to that knowledge on /mu/?
but that's not happening at all. instead /mu/ consists of what it's always consisted of: the same albums and artists posted over and over and over by people who seem to either be uninterested or incapable of going beyond in their interests.
>>65727982
Pic related is one of my favs.
>>65713842
>Anything that isn't pop/indie/metal/hip-hop
Nice. This is my favorite experimental music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koLPQRpEAVU
>>65728721
IIIIIIIIII RIP THE SKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN
>>65728739
OUR VILLAGE
HOT BOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
>>65728768
ELECTRIC BODYBUILDER FROM RUSSIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>65728779
EVERYBODY HEAR ME
>>65728810
WRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP IT UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUP
>>65728662
>"""noise"""
>>65728559
except that you're just assuming all of this shit. actually read the post you replied to. The anon who asked for the essentials chart didn't say anything like "get me started" or anything like that.
>Anyone have any relevant essentials charts they can share?
That is literally all they said. Everything else is you imagining who and what this person is and its entirely unjustified.
Personally I do a lot of research about music that I'm interested in. I find music through many different channels. One of those channels is /mu/ and on /mu/ I have, at times, referred to essentials charts. Only a few times and I never treat them as gospel. I always consider it to be one random person's opinion and taste. I think you'd be a moron if you thought it was anything else.
>>65728944
Yeah, Apple doesn't know much. That happened when that Apple Music thing first happened, I was looking around & saw that. Made my fucking day, lmao.
>>65729482
Contact is a noisy one.
https://youtu.be/r4u3BzM0rqo
what do we think of experimental kpop?
>>65729593
I think it's very nice.
>>65713718
Anyone know some summer experimental albums ?
>>65729593
it's good! reminds me of kpop.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_782geYaEY
I've been listening to this guys stuff for a while after seeing him live a while back.
Don't know how experimental this is, but it's pretty good.
https://clyp.it/5dvmlive
he's got bandcamp or something.
>mfw these threads are exclusively for shitposting
meanwhile check these dubs
>>65730797
reroll
>>65728662
holy shit
>>65727615
>Anyone have any relevant essentials charts they can share?
Envelope Philter > everything.
>>65730794
Kill yourself lmao.
>>65730940
You too.
>>65730797
Shitposters own these threads, it's not even arguable.
Check these though.
>>65731030
you got nothing on me
check these!
>>65731102
Some threads are just cursed with a lack of digitis.
Thoughts?
https://youtu.be/e768rzlYjJk
>>65731129
garbage
>>65731129
thoughts? i think you should check these bad boys.
Thoughts? I think they're really great but they're kind of too obscure atm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWkJghqMSpo
>>65713718
>Noise, drone, electroacoustic, free improvisation, futurism, indeterminacy, musique concrete, sound collage
>experimental
lul
have some actual experimental music:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Stu7h7Qup8
>>65731244
>philip glass
LMAO
at least you got dubs :)
>>65731244
DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUBS
>>65730285
Fennesz: Endless Summer
I'm off to poop.
I'll report back here on how it went after I'm done.
>>65731673
record it :^)
Anyone wanna spoonfed me ?
Im a hungry baby:)
>>65731673
Update: it was pretty good.
Couple of huge brown boulders, a few smaller ones. Very steamy. All of them as solid as it gets, no problems with cleaning up or anything.
I'd give the complete experience a 7/10. It wasn't one of those poops that are so great that they give you that "born again" feeling, but it was nice.
>>65731809
Pooping is a very intimate and introspective ritual for me, it takes me deep within my innermost being every time. I'm not comfortable sharing something like that with anyone, sorry.
>>65728662
this is exactly what i mean. you're making fun of this but this thread only exemplifies the same sentiments. these threads are fucking avant teen garbage
>>65722956
I don't think you know what that word means
>>65724013
So replying to trolls is talking about experimental music?
>>65731809
I've been meaning to record a fart and fuck with the sound wave to make a noise track but whenever I've got one in the chamber I never remember to record it.
Where do I start with Whitehouse?
>>65733547
their seminal album birdseend.
>>65733547
Their first album. It's called Bird Seed.
>>65733547
>Where do I start with Whitehouse?
I think his Fast Show stuff is his best received work
