>>65639628
>Why do people still follow their opinions, again?
they don't, everyone hates p4k

why do we do this again its like were doing things again it makes no sense again its like why again we shouldnt do things just to again

it's almost like they're more than one person and employees and contributors come and go or something

you're right OP, opinions can never change over the span of 20 years

fantasma is a gr8 album tho

>>65639628
people shit on christgau or scruffi for their idiosyncratic taste wrt some records, but at least they don't issue revisions when the culture takes different turns.

>>65639779
thats fine, but they're only re-reviewing albums they were initially low on. they just use re-releases to bolster their consensus w/ readers that they appreciate the 'good' records.

>>65639889
Yea I dunno, there's plenty of rather redundant reissue reviews. M83's Dead Cities, Red Seas & Lost Ghosts got a 9.2 both times for example.

>>65639983
Not only that, but even Before the Dawn Heals Us has the same exact score from both reviews.

>>65639983
i'd be interested to read any lowered reviews.

>>65640054
Hail to the Thief

https://web.archive.org/web/20150224225521/http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/6658-hail-to-the-thief


http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/13384-hail-to-the-thief-special-collectors-edition/

>>65639817
It's one of my favs.
>>65639801
Then why I haven't seen an album that p4k changes it score to something lower?

>>65640143
see here>>65640113

>>65640113
>http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/13384-hail-to-the-thief-special-collectors-edition/
nice find.

File: 1465590041036.png (1 MB, 1011x1980) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1011x1980

Daily reminder that P4K is a joke.