![1461788656874[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/HXbIwWA.jpg "1461788656874[1].jpg")
There's a proven correlation between low iq and the enjoyment of certain music genres (e.g. hip-hop). Therefore, isn't it correct to claim that genres/artists that require higher iq from its listeners are objectively superior?
wow youre such a tool
Yeah, never got into classical until I was a intelligent agent
>>65596401
>implying SAT score has anything to do with IQ
>implying stupid people don't shill beethoven on here all the time
This chart was designed by admitted racists.
White intelligence tests are designed so that POC perform poorly.
who's to say that a higher iq is inherently and objectively superior to a lower iq? You know that having a lower iq tends to lead to a happier life, for example
This is how the data was gathered, take it with a grain of salt op.
>>65596401
Reminder that by this logic ACDC, Oasis, and Coldplay are objectively better than Kanye West, Queen, and most Jazz music
>>65596401
>implying socially retarded NEETs are superior and contribute anything to society
Tool fans smarter than Doors fans? Lol
>>65596477
>>65596553
You're both proving my point.
>>65596582
They do; that doesn't matter.
>>65596591
Do you have any evidence to support that?
>>65596605
>You know that having a lower iq tends to lead to a happier life
What's your point?
>>65596606
Yeah, I know it's not scientifically sound, but it can't be disregarded that easily. There are several studies showing a correlation between intelligence and capacity for artistic appreciation and creativity; the casual study in the OP probably points to the same phenomena.
>>65596656
I'm okay with that
>>65596675
Are you implying all neets are intelligent?
Listening to Classical, Jazz and Avant-Garde just makes you pretentious not smart.
>>65596758
Nobody is saying that. You probably listen to hip-hop, right?
A theory on why Guster is so high: I'm from Mass. and they're real popular among suburban white kids here who also just happen to be around the best school systems in the country. Basically any band that is unusually popular among kids in the suburban Northeast US are going to have by far higher average test scores.
>>65596758
Why do you say that? Very curious to hear your response.
>>65596710
Define artistic appreciation. I can guarantee you majority of the general population can appreciate art.
Also, there is without a doubt a correlation between intelligence and wealth. The same people who can appreciate the arts also have time and money to actively seek out newer art, if that makes sense.
>>65596710
Are you fucking autistic, reading that was a topkek
>>65596710
>Do you have any evidence to support that?
It's not my job to prove things to you. Look up SAT racial biases.
>>65596862
It's to score brownie points and to look down upon the proles.
Essentially it's the worst kind of elitism, because you're using music as an accessory to be "hip".
Those who actually listen to Classical Music, don't brag about it.
>>65596898
>Define artistic appreciation
Please refer to Lindell, Annukka K., and Julia Mueller. "Can science account for taste? Psychological insights into art appreciation." Journal of Cognitive Psychology 23.4 (2011): 453-475.
>>65596901
No, are you a butthort hip-hop fan?
>>65596931
There's extensive research on both the correlations between SAT and IQ and the cultural/racial neutrality of IQ tests. What you call SAT racial biases could easily be explained by socioeconomic differences. That doesn't point to a biased test, but rather inequality among the test takers
>>65597038
>butthort
This has got to be fucking b8
>>65597038
Man, I'm not going to take an argument on 4chan's music board so seriously that I'll refer to a chapter in a book to understand your viewpoint.
>>65596976
What constitutes bragging in your mind?
>>65596931
You sound very unsure of yourself.
>>65596976
calling people's tastes and authenticity into question is the most juvenile trick in the book. no need to project that hard
>>65597077
typo
>>65597188
this paper has the most comprehensive definition to date, in my opinion.
>>65597270
Paraphrase it then.
It should serve as a way to back up your argument, not be your argument itself.
>>65596695
I've found that a bit odd as well.
>>65596931
educate us shitlords please
>>65596401
Music does not require a certain IQ to enjoy or understand, nor does that chart imply that it does. That chart doesn't even have anything to do with IQ.
>>65596695
The doors, seriously? Tool is bad, but doors are significantly worse and 15x more overrated.
>>65597038
that's what he meant by SAT racial biases I'm pretty sure. The socioeconomic issues you bring up ARE the reason people in poorer areas do worse on the SATs. They don't have good teachers and their school's lack of class leveling (CP, Honors, and AP) really fucks over students. That's why so many drop out.
I don't agree what your definition of smart is. SAT scores essentially are based on how much effort you put into studying.
>>65596401
>near perfect sat
>sufjan stevens is one my favorite artists
checks out. how do you subhuman rap """""music""""" fans feel?
>niggers have low IQs
stop the fucking presses
Your entire point is being made for no other reason than to feel superior to others, so yes, you are a huge tool. I don't understand this study because I'm confident I've seen another study that your taste in music has to do only with what you listened to when you grew up.
>>65597796
sat is a very good indicator of iq since its design is based on iq tests.
act is more of a test of knowledge.
>>65596401
study is actually bullshit because it's just the scores of people who like certain bands. this indicates literally nothing in the realm of science.
>Counting Crows
>>65596591
>AYOOO HOL UP, DESE ESS AYY TEES ARE RACISS N SHIEEET CAUSE I AINT PASSED
Blaming intelligence, or lack thereof on, ones skin color is racist and promoted victimhood
EVERYBODY REPEAT AFTER ME
SAY I LOVE SOCA
