ITT you post last 5 albums rated on rym
I still need to give Roxy Music s/t a complete listen
>>65563576
I'm amazed how shockingly awful NLMD was. That was pretty close to a 1.5/10
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Prismadoll
I've had better 5 album runs
>>65563625
Maneige is a pretty good band, haven't heard that release yet though
>>65563683
why do you tag your ratings with numbers?
>check out my ratings for these albums I don't know shit about that I listened to once
RYM is cancer
unrated = 10/10
>>65563576
bad taste
Not familiar with the other posts.
>>65563728
why are you so insecure
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Notelord
>>65563683
I dunno what you expected, still surprised you liked Tonight that much
>>65563707
So I know when to listen to a meme
4 away from my 500th rating. I'm listen to the Sonic R soundtrack
>>65563772
you don't need a reason to listen to memes
you know you WANT to
>>65563842
That's why I save them for special occasions. Makes it extra special
>>65563772
CAN YOU FEEL THE SUNSHINE?
DOES IT BRIGHTEN UP YOUR DAY?
>>65563707
yes
>>65563891
come on we all know that's a great song
>>65563576
>rating the National over Marvin Gaye
??
>>65563732
swans hasnt even released it yet hold your rating machine a couple days dude
>>65563891
I'm honestly really excited. That game has some unironically great songs.
>>65563576
I actually thought A Night at the Opera would be way better but it's total shit except for the singles.
>>65564011
what are your other steely dan ratings?
>>65564004
Well if you listen to this kind of music unironically then yes
>>65563740
The RYM userbase is obviously insecure. We're talking about people who are trying to work their way through as many albums as they can just so they can spew their shitty uninformed opinions and feel like they have some relevance or authority on a subject they spent no time really engaging with. Case in point OP rates the fucking National higher than Marvin Gaye and Roxy Music. These people don't care about art. It's so blatant and I just find it disgusting. Last.fm is equally as problematic. These sites have their uses but they also result in some people using music as a means to an end, purely for social reasons or just to appear a certain way.
>>65564095
None yet. It was the first record by them I've heard, found it featured on picrelated
Better than Loggins and Messina for sure
>>65564112
see
>>65563740
now with added projection
>>65564139
hilarious
try
cant buy a thrill
countdown to ecstasy
'fire in the hole' is from the first album and is still my favourite dan song
>>65564112
its really just a lot of people trying to indulge in as much art as possible in their short lifetimes. stop romanticising the days when everything was physical and you had a new album once a week
also no one I know has any idea what rym is, despite being music people
its not a social tool
>>65564112
Oh my god. What a crime. OP expressed his opinion on his own profile. So what now? Does he write for some magazine? Is he paid for it? No. He does it for his own pleasure and doesn't force his opinions on anyone.
Also, National are bad now? I've heard Marvin Gaye, and I found him boring as fuck. Relevant in his time for his political statements maybe, but I'd rather listen to Prince, Stevie Wonder, Curtis Mayfield or Otis Redding any day. IMO the album deserves 6/10.
>>65564240
I feel like Dan was simply amazing, the kind of guys who were extremely proficient and simply made super high quality music.
Unfortunately right now I'm on a sad quest to find if The Cure had a single album worthy of listening today aside from Disintegration. Right now I'm in the niddle of Kiss Me Kiss Me Kiss Me.
>>65564213
You know it's true. A lot of anons on /mu/ openly admit that their last.fm charts have had an impact on their listening habits for example.
>>65564313
>its really just a lot of people trying to indulge in as much art as possible
This is the problem, treating art like it's some kind of disposable thing to skim your way through. Just don't even bother. Nothing wrong with digital but it's true this is what's happened since the internet. It's still fucked.
>>65564644
there's a difference between feeling that people may be watching (they're not but you know that's not how internet stuff works) and subtly having your listening habits change as a result, and the wild assumptions you were throwing around earlier brah
>>65564721
Not that crazy bro
>>65563772
but you can see the number right here
are you retarded?
>>65563683
There are many good songs there (Glass Spider,
New York's in Love, etc.). It's easy 3.5 / 5.
I'm a Bowie fag though
Going through Springsteen's discography and all the top 1,000 albums that I haven't yet
no
fuck you
everything is ok
>>65566666
SPICY
>>65566666
Dookie's better than that
>>65566590
i can live with this
>>65566666
hi satan
clipping. should be higher
>>65566666
cancer
Nice stuff
https://rateyourmusic.com/~regency
>>65566827
Blehck
>>65566869
Wow this is some of the worst taste I have ever seen
Keiji Haino's wankery over Bleach?
>>65566903
>bleach over anything
worse taste, you're talking about one of the shittiest bands there's been
>>65566784
have you heard go sailor aka better heavenly
>>65564011
doesn't that one have lazing on a sunday afternoon and seaside rendezvous those are so fun
ok maybe not that fun after listening to them twice
>>65566903
There is no such thing as good or bad taste. It is entirely opinion.
Bleach is overly derivative, and in the areas in which it is original it lacks enough variation or instrumental force to create significant interest.
The only factor it could challenge Haino's album on is catharsis, which (in my opinion) Keiji Haino still does better.
>>65566666
>>65563576
>Alligator over What's Going On
what in the actual fucking fuck is wrong with you? one of the absolute worst displays of taste I've ever seen
>>65567417
>getting this mad over the music someone else likes
kys
