...since /mu/ circle jerks it so much, I decided to give a quick look at it and for god's sake... this's a terrible site. Why do you even care again?
>>65465247
Why do you care is a a better question. The only time I even know what pitchfork rated something is when someone on /mu/ is either bitching or celebrating the score.
>Remember those two goth girls you knew back in high school.
I wasn't prepared for this feel
>>65465247
Pitchfork is terrible, but Ulver are too. Get some taste.
hello sumerfag
i don't. scaruffi and prindle all the way.
>>65465247
I don't care, and no one else really does anymore. It's a relic of /mu/ culture from like 4 years ago, it's mostly just there to be memed and made fun of now.
>>65465247
You're seriously mad about an Ulver score?
>>65465276
Because the entire taste of this board is based on that site.
>>65465323
WTF i totally dont think pitchfork has a race based agenda anymore, im a #PitchforkMan now
Is David M. Pecoraro the new Brent DiCrescenzo?
>>65465323
2009 was admittedly pretty good year for p4k
>>65465323
Still a fucking huge jump dude.
Admit it there just trying to keep up with what's popular.
>>65465460
How come someone be this bad at reviewing albums and get a job again music review site?
On a side note he also gave Franz Ferdinard 9.1.
