Why do people consider this good again?
It's by far the worst /mu/core.
>>65394692
Is this bait? pet sounds will never be /mu/core, but MPP will, deal with it
>>65394723
How is Pet Sounds not /mu/core?
>>65394739
just because sperglords like you just heard it and talk about it doesnt mean its /mu/core. MPP is /mu/core because that's music from this generation, pet sounds is like a billion years old and doesnt represent /mu/core at all
>>65394816
/mu/ talking about it and listening to it generally does make it /mu/core again
>>65394723
its been in /mu/core charts since the 2000s
>>65394876
>>65394919
MPP is this generations pet sounds it much better represents the stupid gimicky quirky fedora shit /mu/ eats up. if it was the 60s then id go with the beach boys
>>65395013
Not relevant.
/mu/core is music often discussed here. If it's good/bad/justified doesn't matter. If you don't understand that, you should lurk more.
>>65395061
hahah faggot i think you should get over the fact that pet sounds will never be regarded as /mu/core because its not
/mu/core is quirky like surfjan stevens or esoteric like death grips, etc, not the fucking beach boys
>>65395107
ok how about this. there is no /mu/core but these albums get posted about here from time to time
>>65395107
>hahah faggot i think you should get over the fact that pet sounds will never be regarded as /mu/core because its not
It doesn't matter to me, It's not even my favorite Beach Boys album.
>/mu/core is quirky like surfjan stevens or esoteric like death grips, etc, not the fucking beach boys
See >>65395107
Please lurk more before posting, newfriend
>>65395155
>there is no /mu/core
See >>65395061
>>65394723
>thinking an album being /mu/core is a good thing
>>65395013
>stupid gimicky quirky fedora shit
great argument!
>>65394816
What about Remain In Light, or even ITAOTS? They're not this generation either.
>>65394816
/mu/core are albums that are discussed highly on the board you fucking retard
>>65395422
you've arrived too late