>>65262117
>Swans
>>65262117
Literally all this guy does is puts an adjective in front of something in the song and acts like a genius
>Sweaty sax solos
rap tap tapping snares
>>65263055
how else could you describe music without sounding dry.
>>65263126
How is just slapping an adjective on everything not dry?
>>65263055
He doesn't really act like a genius at all. As a matter of fact I get the idea that he doesn't take himself nearly as seriously as most of the fags that populate this board do.
>>65263126
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/boldfaure/reviews
>>65263155
just try to describe an instrument without adjectives and see how far you get.
>>65263242
You know there's more to music than the instruments.
Like, I don't know, the fucking notes?
>>65263280
I'm pretty sure Fantano keeps notes too, dude
>>65263235
>cascading melodies
>pleasant harmonic turns
>pleasant
>soft tones
>dynamic contrast
>cheesy melodies
its basically the same thing
>>65263306
oh so you're b8ing
>>65263280
okay.. describe the notes without using adjectives
>>65263314
"Cascading" is a much better descriptor than "farty."
>>65263335
this
>>65263344
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ain-dSUaosw
>>65263055
He says he's the internet's busiest music nerd, not the smartest.
>>65263055
>acts like a genius
I think you've got the wrong critic friendo
>>65263334
Read the reviews linked >>65263235
>>65263511
Christgau is the far bigger snob.
>>65263511
Fantano literally has video bragging about all his accomplishments
>>65263536
Christgau is not a snob at all, he frequently talks specifically from his personal taste.
>>65263335
Fantano does use better adjectives than that most of the time.
>Indie Rock Outfit
>>65265165
He does not.
Unless you can provide examples you're at the disadvantage.
>braggodocious violas
Actual fantanoisms:
"Howling and melancholic snares"
"Frosty guitars"
"Disloyal synth progressions"
>>65265390
"Howling and melancholic snares"
Snares are the least likely instrument to howl
>>65265390
what the fuck does the last one even mean? the first two are fucking stupid and illogical but what the fuck context was that third one in?
>>65265593
I'm assuming that the synth progressions didn't fit well in the song
>>65265593
forget where it was from but I think he was trying to convey that the synth progressions were so alluring and ear-grabbing that they distracted from the rest of the song
>ABSOLUTELY ANAEROBIC TRUMPETING *laughs*
Jesus fucking christ
he just made those isms up retards
>>65265637
>>65265649
What an idiotic mixed metaphor
>>65263335
the problem is that when people criticize him, they usually say he only uses adjectives and buzzwords, not that he isn't eloquent enough