ITT: Albums where the second half is better than the first
That's wrong, though the album does build to a crescendo so I can see why you'd think that
>>65224037
i listen to that album since 2011 but i never ever heard the last 5 tracks.
that's not fair, the second half is longer than the first so has more time for good musical ideas
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
this is the most retarded thing I've read on /mu/ in a while
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
>>65224093
>>65224098
he's probably talking about the sides of the LP?
>>65224037
PFNO
I love both halves, but the second half is the one that rly does it for me
>the second half is longer than the first
>>65224071
lmao you're missing out on the best tracks: Summer Crane and Extra Kings
>>65224118
the album doesn't have sides tho
>>65224122
4reel?
i think the first 3 tracks are the best, except velvet waltz which is the best thing they ever did
>>65224119
This too. Pree Sisters Swallowing a Donkey's Eye is the most underrated NMH song ever
>>65224168
Velvet Waltz, Untrustable and Out of Site are all top 10 BtS songs for me, so that's why I prefer the second half
>>65224074
>that's not fair, the second half is longer than the first
>inb4 a shit load of replies
But seriously anon i think you may want to re read that sentence.
>>65224074
Hurr
>>65224144
lots of bizarre things being said in this thread
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
Wew
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
>>65224037
I have a rule where if a friend puts this album on in the car, and we get to ETOH, then we have to sit there and finish the album, even if we've reached our destination.
So fucking beautiful
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
Man, and what about the THIRD half?
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
ohohohoh boy
>>65226104
Yeah, I have a similar rule
This easy
>>65224074
>>65224074
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you meant the latter 9 tracks combined have a longer runtime than do the first 9 tracks, in which case that statement isn't retarded
King of Limbs
>>65224074
I want in this screencap, too
Only because it has the best hip-hop song ever
>>65224074
probably meant the songs in the second half are longer... Fucking retards.
Easily.
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
reminder that runtime and # of tracks don't always correspond. the whole "the second half is longer" thing was probably talking about the length of the songs rather than # of tracks. but even then it still doesn't make any fucking sense
>>65224074
can you explain yourself
>>65224074
u fockin what m8
>>65229126
even if this is what he meant it's still incredibly stupid. the first 9 tracks are 29 minutes and the next nine are 32
>>65224074
what dod me hran byvthis
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first
>>65224037
easily
>>65224074
>>65224074
>>65224037
>>65231781
itt trolls
Definitely.
>>65227731
postan dis on /r/4chan now xDD
>>65230273
>Giving Bad People Good Ideas
>Hot Head
>Spikes
>Warping
>Eh
>Bubbles Buried in This Jungle
vs
>Three Bedrooms in a Good Neighborhood
I think the first half wins this one.
>>65232136
>what is ring a bell
>what is 80808
>>65232171
Pure shit, my man
>>65232183
well, no
>>65224074
>the second half is longer than the first half
>>65224074
>>65232171
ring a bells good. not a fan of 808
>>65233034
80808 has an amazing hook
>>65232907
accurate
>>65233069
hm. i'll relisten to it. it has the unfortunate task of getting out of the shadow of the title track. which is a monster of a track
>>65233163
i actually dislike title track. Think it's boring. same chord over and over
>>65233204
Not him, but I think you're a retard.
>>65233204
interesting. i think thats the reason i like it. repetition builds the energy
>>65233240
ok
>>65233270
i prefer your reply to the other one
