How does it compare?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
How does it compare?
good pop music
>>64667410
fucking this... make a new Innerspeaker pls guise
To what retard?
poorly
>>64667605
I'm sleep deprived as shit, get off my case. Obviously it's implied I mean their other albums. Whatever, this will die in like 3 posts max
>>64667396
better than lonerism imo
best album kevin finally had the money to make the pop album he always wanted
best pop rock band atm
>>64667396
it's p good, but a bit gay at times. Lonerism and Innerspeaker and way better
It's one of my favorite albums.
>>64667791
>>64667410
It's kind of justified I guess, but I still cringe when people use 'pop' to refer to Tame Impala. Before this, they were probably my favorite band but now it's sad to see such a change in sound...
>>64667969
tame impala were never not pop
>>64667969
whats wrong with the pop sound?
I Would love for top 40 to be centered around the sound on currents
>>64667720
>replies to the fifth post
>>64667396
It's good but it doesn't really have the Tame Impala sound
>>64668024
You think Currents is influential enough to have such an impact on the top 40? My complaint is the other way around, mate.
>>64667396
To the rest of their work? Very well. They're all pop albums, but holy fuck does Kevin Parker have a knack for making great pop songs. Plebs think it's their worst because it doesn't have so much of the fun but fairly generic psychedelic guitar work on it, and basically gives up the guise that it's anything other than a pop album. Same song style, slightly different sound, basically. Although personally my favourite Tame Impala songs are on Currents.
>>64667720
>he's a reasonable man
