I just recieved a pair of ATH-M50 Headphones in the mail after listening to music on a shitty pair of Skullcandy Ink'd earbuds all my life.
What album should I listen to first?
Love those headphones. Had my pair since 2013; they've served me v well. Listen to Kid A, friend.
bottomless pit by death grips
>>64646782
All hail West Texas
>>64646828
>195kps
Pic related, I've been using this shit for too long.
I have a .cd account, so really anything goes.
>>64646782
Confield
>>64646844
I dunno I'm just listening on spotify
Amon Tobin - Bricolage
Trust me anon
>>64646782
Death Grips or Animal Collective or some some niggerbass p4k shit like that.
>>64646844
https://mega.nz/#!JZMHSBIC!o3GcV40r8vQgx0fyGt3BxOlw9xSBGS8dNWU5IZ0i2qM
>>64646844
>320 kbps mp3
>FLAC
http://www.audiocheck.net/soundtests_headphones.php
Test the headphones to see if they're okay from the manufacture
>>64646961
Thank you, friend!
>>64646827
You've got it.
You should send them back and actually research good headphones in that price range
>meme cans
>>64647183
I paid $90 for them.
Get fucked.
Merzbow - Pulse Demon
>>64647238
why did you share this image?
>>64647207
You got ripped off famalamagram
>>64647207
Still can find better headphones with $90, just wait until the ear fatigue sets in
>>64647294
Not him but those are fragile as fuck and don't have detachable cabes
My cable is fucked up and it is literally useless now
>>64647294
Do you need an amplifier to fully enjoy that headphones?
>>64647354
Tell that to the boom operator at your local news station.
>>64646844
>195kps
What in the fuck? Surely you meant 192.
>>64646782
1. The sound card in your laptop can't process audio that well so it wont make a difference.
2. Unless you listen to a CD, .WAV or FLAC files, your listening to compressed garbage
3. You'll need a DAC. the headphones alone don't supply much power
>>64647382
Do you need 10 megapixels to enjoy that cameltoe?
>>64647443
lol
you got the normal 50s or the 50x?
>>64647443
>2. Unless you listen to a CD, .WAV or FLAC files, your listening to compressed garbage
>headphones alone don't supply much power
>don't supply much power
Are you genuinely this stupid?
>>64647485
They don't even manufacture the m50 anymore
>>64647382
No, because they are impossible to enjoy
>>64647518
Some people go for the older models i heard. Apparently, they're a bit flatter on the bass
I have 50 bucks, what is the best headphones that I can buy?
>>64647578
keep saving faggot
>>64647578
Save and get a pair of Phillips SHP9500, price goes up and down from $60-99 so keep an eye out
>>64647558
I also heard the older models have less bass but they also have boosted treble.
The newermodels are more linear in more bad and a slow roll off of treble.
It really depends on what you want but the the newet models have better cushions and a detachable cable. The m40 Sean's to have an average of a more accurate headphone though
>>64647578
Not much but $90 will get you a hm5 clone which are great headphones
>>64647704
This post is a mess
>the newermodels are more linear in more bad and a slow roll off of treble
The newer models are more linear in slow rolled off treble
>The m40 Sean's to have an average of a more accurate headphone though
The m40x seems to have, on average, a more accurate response as a headphone
Sorry Im on smartphone and drunk
>>64647418
autism
>>64647341
I use ATM50's for mixing and have no problem with ear fatigue.
>>64647444
this made me lol
These are quite comfy, for $100 how did I do /mu/?
OP here
fuck all y'all I'm gonna listen to this
>>64648155
8/10 for the price range because they are only $80 on amazon
>>64648519
got them a few months ago senpai