>that person who re-encodes their mp3 128k files to flac and then shares them online
>many of the comments praising uploader
>'thanks so much, great quality!'
>tfw i do that
>>64641394
>>64641394
people who do stuff like this should be ran over
i always check on audacity now
>people who think their 320 kbps mp3 is automatically better than VBO
>shared zip/torrent album is a convert of youtube video
>>64641394
>mfw I am nearly deaf due to hearing defect
>mfw I can't distinguish between mp3s and flacs and enjoy them all the same
>mfw I look at all you "le audiophiles" bitching because they can't squeeze out another kbps from their shitty dadrock album
Life's good, man.
OHOHOHO what has /mu/ turned into over the years
>not fucking knowing where to download reliable flacs without having to check manually
also
>having to check, i.e. in audacity
if you can't hear the differences yourself then why would you even bother to check
>>64641585
>he's proud of being disabled
>>64641483
How do you check in audacity?
>>64642154
you look at the audio spectrum on any program that can do that (idk if audacity can) and then you need to be familiar with "what mp3s look like" in their cutoffs etc
>>64641585
>nearly deaf
>"Life's good, man."
If you say so anon. ..
>>64642260
Ah ok. Yeah I do this in foobar2k. I was just curious if audacity had any other specific tools
>>64641414
i lik youre digits :^)
