despite all these "who is the queen of /mu/" threads recently, we all know who it really is
no question
wow it's clear none of you were here back in 2008 when /mu/ actually had taste in female musicians
she's too cute for to be queen. Princess maybe
>>64634482
dude they're debating who the best fap material is, calm down it has nothing to do with music
>>64634482
bjork's music is great though
>>64634220
Nico > Bjork
Fuck, marry, kill?
im gonna go full ricardo lopez
I'm trying to make a playlist of björks songs like "Pluto", "declare independence", and "nattura".
Any other songs similar?
Is this completely based on musical quality, or is attraction a component as well?
Because in terms of music, Björk is totally deserving - I respect her as much as any living musician. She's incredible.
But I've always found her very unattractive. I've been on this board since '09 and the entire time fanboys have been telling me about their crushes on her. I just don't get it. I don't see it. At all.
grimes>bjork>st. vincent
in that order
faggots
>>64634629
hard choice but probably fuck bjork marry pj and kill tori
>>64634673
she's cute
>>64634673
/mu/tans like their taste in music like something that is a bit quirky and off so they can brag about how patrician their taste is this is reflected in the women they find attractive
>>64634673
For me it's very much her personality that makes her attractive, and of course her music is amazing. It just depends on the person I guess, I think she's a qt.
![Lauren-ChvrchesLandscape[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GT8JPa7.jpg "Lauren-ChvrchesLandscape[1].jpg")
this girl is 28
>>64634629
kill tori
fuck pj
marry bork
this is objectively the correct answer
>>64634972
She looks 15.
Yep. Queen of /mu/ threads are pointless when Bjork is handily the board's collective waifu.
Oh how the mighty have fallen
>>64635723
Grimey is unstoppable
>>64634629
Kill Tori
Fuck Bjork
Marry PJ
sorry Bjork but I need to fuck PJ more than once
Me?
Meme?
are there any bjork nudes
>>64634629
kill tori, fuck bjork, marry pj
>>64634629
Marry Bjork, Fuck Tori, Kill PJ.
>>64636402
>>64634220
Björk is one of the greatest minds of the contemporary music scene in which to art is concerned. She has the ability to combine pure poetry, perfectly executed songs, visual accompaniments that fit greatly with each idea of what the songs represent, and last but not least, a unique voice that comes deep inside one and touches your inner senses like you never experienced before.
>>64634972
>>64635324
She looks retarded.
>>64636402
yes
sadly nothing featuring her pussy
>>64634220
Bjork is just a poor man's Kate Bush
>>64634673
It is obviously based on music yes, to be the queen you need to make god-tier music precisely, which she always made.
But momentarily aside from music, do you really find this unattractive? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder nonetheless.
>>64636970
Kate Bush is just an old man's Bjork.
>>64636973
can i feel free to have a boner?
>>64634692
>>64635921
>>64636413
lmao fucking faggots, you're literally given the chance to marry the most interesting woman in the world and blow it
>>64634998
>>64636480
these guys know
>>64636900
Disgusting
>>64636970
GOD DAYAM
>>64634220
You have 10 second to name a more significant, creative and original active woman in music than Bjork.
>>64637412
Joanna Newsom
Julia Holter
Holly Herndon
what do I win?
>>64637285
>having shit taste
>>64637412
It starts with G and ends with S. Big Hint: she's Canadian.
>>64637412
Bjork is more relevant than Bjork.
>>64637450
>Joanna Newsom
Great harp player, although not original and with a squeaky-tier voice.
>Julia Holter
Very good but literally Kate Bush professional off-ripper.
>Holly Herndon
Not even more significant than the previous two.
>>64637454
Eat da poopu.
>>64637625
You eat that
This is literally heaven made in musical form:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPka0o_KXmA
This is literally heaven made in musical form:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGSwtEHE1dE
>>64634666
Sacrifice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5TvSAM8IK0
>>64634618
>active
>>64637452
Do you honestly find that picture of bjork attractive? Look at those disgusting titties, flat ass, and fat body. And her face looks a mongoloid with fetal alcohol syndrome.
Meanwhile, Joanna Newsom has a big fat ass I'd bury my dick inside of. And her face isn't repulsive.
>>64638042
sorry I should have said
>being 13
>>64634673
She's kinda cute, but, nothing to paint over, at least not to me.
>>64638042
>>64638094
>>64638085
That haircut is eldergod-tier
but it either fits girls incredibly well or incredibly bad
>>64638085
Wow, she's starting to look old already. I thought they said Asians don't age like shit? Still pretty, but I'd hate to see what she looks like another 10 years from now.
>>64634673
Well her Icelandic accent, and otherworldly personality makes her somewhat attractive also that kind of asian look i guess
Ive never wanted to fuck bjork though
>>64634618
FUCK OFF
>>64638042
Joanna Newsom is essentially all about butt desu, she is kinda like the typical american blonde chick. She has nothing of the particularity which Bjork has, neither on the musical aspect neither physical.
You guys... in one thread complaining how new Radiohead is boring, in this thread saying how good Bjork is.
>>64638431
They're both great you stupid dumbasshole.
>>64638431
>doesn't even know about the influence which bjork has on little thommy
>>64634972
she acts and sounds like an old lady
>>64638406
Bjork is far less interesting as a musician than Joanna Newsom. Even people who despise Newsom's voice and music itself agree on that.
>>64638690
how can a sane person actually think this
>>64638431
Thom Yorke has a huge crush on Bjork since 1997, musically talking, but probably even physically. Did you ever listened to this Radiohead intro often used in their concerts before beginning? It's a song of hers, fag:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u5LwiHfxMc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVvO4mPoZiA
>>64638473
>>64638498
>pretends that influences make the influencer talented
Bjork is a worthless turd. Yoko Ono sounding ass bitch ass dying animal ass turd.
>>64638690
Are you okay anon? I don't really think so.
>>64638765
>literally a 8 years baby with a keyboard
Finish elementary school you retarded crack.
>>64638753
Difference is I don't have to hear Bjork's fucking god awful semi-yodeling shrill Icelandic igloo mantra bullshit.
>>64638834
People like you mae /mu/ a bad place. Like my opinion is worth less than yours because it's different. Also, are people still using retarded as an insult? Sorry I don't like Bjork, don't die....
>>64638431
>>64638765
>>64638835
Woa, are Radiohead fans so trisomic regressed? I guess this board is truly right about their underage.
>>64638876
>calling a typical post-scholastic insult as an opinion
Sorry, nah.
>>64638765
>>64638835
kek at these guys
>>64638898
>trisomic
>you must be 40+ years old to understand Bjork
Hadnt listened to Bjork in a while , watched Dancer in the Dark , Scatterheart is top tier
>>64638765
>>64638835
Thom Yorke has concretely the same depressed cringe lament way of singing since 25 years, get the fuck out of here.
>>64639045
At least Thom Yorke sounds good to my ear holes. Bjork has the same ikjsadhfasdf boring since hjfghkjdhfd boring.
>>64638732
>>64638790
most of Bjork's music is nothing more than a mix of trip-hop and electro pop provided to her by producers who, unlike Bjork, actually create the majority of them music on the album. Medulla is her only truly interesting album musically, although the concept behind it is a bit stale for a full length album anyway
on the other hand, Newsom plays complex and progressive folk music backed by an orchestra and a variety of instruments that Bjork isn't even aware of. I think that Bjork has the better voice here but Newsom is by far the superior musician and far more interesting as an artist
anyway I don't mean to hate on Bjork here, I enjoy a couple of her albums, but only her voice holds the distinction of being more unique than Newsom in any way.
>>64639028
>>64639170
You must be under 10 years old to be so idiotic.
>>64639273
You must be over 40 years old to listen to that whiny self indulgent cunt.
>>64639252
>Bjork
>electro pop
9/10 bait friend
>>64639398
it's true though. bjork is an electronic pop artist for the most part. i have no idea why i'm responding to someone as ignorant as you but whatever. only an idiot would genuinly think bjork's music was more unique overall than newsom's.
bjork's "i'm so quirky hahahha i want sex" persona must be influencing your opinion here
>>64639547
electro-pop is a different genre though mate, I know it's hard to keep up with all these genre's when you've only been listening to music properly for the past two years but do try and think before you type
>>64639252
>>64639547
Dude I think you're trying to force yourself over something you actually don't even truly know. Probably you've been mislead by some stupid person on this board, it happens. By your own words you clearly show that you don't know anything about her. Bjork's career is one the most polyhedral and multifaceted you can find, and she works hard on every albums she puts out, the meme thing about the producers is just dumb. Watch her documentaries about the studio sessions and you will learn how she controls everything is going on.
>>64639252
>>64639547
Considering her first band to her last album, you can hear any kind of musical language; electronics of all types, lots of classical and jazz (Gling-Glò), alternative rock (Sugarcubes), trip-hop (Homogenic is considered the epitaph of the genre alongside Mezzanine and Dummy) avant-garde (Drawing Restraint 9, Medúlla, Biophilia, KUKL), industrial (Volta), folktronica, IDM, techno, acid house, an incredible a capella (Medúlla is almost entirely done with the human voice), baroque pop, alternative dance, ambient, lowercase (in Vespertine there are a multitude of minuscule sampled and rendered sounds), post-punk (Kukl, Tappi Tikarrass), ethereal wave (Vespertine), and much more peculiar things which are indefinable. Also Vulnicura has defined her in a more “progressive-electronica” way than ever in her career. This entire discography is immense, have to look also the myriad of singles in which there are many unreleased tracks as b-sides and alternative versions. Still today you may discover new things. Bjork's music is like a planet.
>>64637625
Grouper
>>64639547
universal consensus says she's no pop actually
>>64639547
>>64639547
This meme about the bjork-sex-thing is starting to annoy
>>64638690
That is completely wrong. Newsom is very safe and makes old sounding boring folk music. You really can't compare her with the wildly experimental Bjork.
ITT: teenagers arguing about female pop stars
>>64638042
anyone who doesn't appreciate bjork's unique beauty is an underage b&
>>64634482
>wow it's clear none of you were here back in 2008 when /mu/ actually had taste in female musicians
yeah, back when lady gaga and teagan and sara were /mu/core
lol fuck off revisionist
>>64640383
>thinking bjork is a pop star
>thinking bjork is pop
>in 2016
One option: >>>/tv/
>"he guys, why don't you lick me out"
>>64640968
Björk L I T E R A L L Y writes pop songs
>>64640211
If you actually think that Newsom isn't an interesting artist, then I feel bad for you. I'm not even the dude who tried to claim that Bjork isn't unique.
Newsom's insanely poetic lyrics and highly complex arrangements of both the harp and other orchestral instruments are not "old sounding boring folk music". I really hope you're false flagging here, and don't actually think that.
>>64641074
This.
It's not even a bad thing, but Bjork is a pop musician and I'm sure she wouldn't deny it herself.
