>Current year
>listening to music on mp3s
Please tell me no one does this when .flac exists. Please, I need to hear it.
>>64623788
>Current year
>People still fall for the audio format that takes up 72x as much space as in necessary just for some sort of delusional masturbatory bragging right
>>64623864
/thread
>>64623788
flac takes up too much space. I've only got enough hard drive space for mp3's
>>64623864
>>64623864
Pretty much this.
>>64623864
this right here, you are retarded OP, congratulations
>>64623879
KTT please fucking go
>>64623788
don't worry, i can perfectly hear your mom's pussy squirting on my dick
>>64623879
>OP samememeing
bathedic
>>64623788
>current year
>being unironically concerned about the file type that people use to listen to music
Please have sex
>>64623788
>>64623864
OP bought into the meme lmao
tbqh OP I have the space and ability to have all my music in flac but because of always seeing shit from hipsters and memers like yourself about it I can't help but feel like a fag when using it.
lmao .flac is just placebo it's impossible to hear the difference
>>64623864
>>64623911
>>64623983
There seems to be a lot of misconceptions in the music community regarding the differences between 320kbps mp3 and FLAC format. It is true that 320kbps is technically as good as FLAC, but there are other reasons to get music in a lossless format.
Hearing the difference now isn’t the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is ‘lossy’. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA – it’s about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don’t want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.
I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange…well don’t get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren’t stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you’ll be glad you did.
>>64624124
lol
>>64624124
nice meme
wavfag here
>>64624124
So will it delete itself when it reaches 0kbs?
I used to have everything in flac on my PC but fuck whats the point
fuck vinyl too what a waste of money I've actually gone back to CDs
>>64624247
congrats on not being a tryhard.
>>64624124
>>64624124
is this for real? judging by these responses im guessing no but i dont want to take the risk. dont laugh at me please
>>64624247
a flac rip of a cd is the same quality as a cd, whereas a 320 rip throws away data.
The people that rip on flac are just lazy/butthurt that they spent too much time collecting an inferior quality format and get really defensive when you bring it up. The reactions are so transparent.
And yes, if you have a high quality stereo you can hear the difference
>>64624782
unfortunately it isn't.
