Are you ready for 10s across the board?
http://pitchfork.com/news/65135-pitchfork-to-review-key-albums-in-the-prince-catalog/?mbid=social_facebook
>a news article on upcoming reviews
Hahahaha, thanks Conde Nast.
Pitchfork is finished.
>>64421395
>popular
>black
>died
pitchfork's perfect formula for 9s and 10s
>>64421722
That's cuz it all run by pretentious white faggots wearing butt plugs
>>64421456
where else would they put the announcement
is covering one of the most influential pop artists of the 20th century selling out?
In b4
> white people can't review Prince
>>64422053
Black people can't either. Only mixed-race people can review Prince, so please keep your unwanted opinions to yourself.
>>64421722
His last four albums all got below a 5.
>>64422212
that was before he died tho.
>>64422210
I was being sarcastic mate
>>64421722
Prince deserves those scores because his music was amazing bruh
>>64422212
>His last four albums all got below a 5.
>inb4 they go donuts on all of em
>>64422354
I'm not. Now shoo :)
>>64421395
Let's predict the scores
>Purple Rain
10/10
>Dirty Mind
10/10
>Controversy
10/10
>Around the World in a Day
8.3/10
>Sign 'o the Times
10/10
>Parade
9.2/10
>Diamonds and Pearls
7.8/10
>>64422325
If they review Prince's best albums and give them 9s and 10s, I don't think you could argue it's for any reason other than the music. Of course, they are only reviewing them because he died, but the scores would be reasonable.
>>64422505
>Diamonds and Peals
>Around the World in a Day
>"Prince's best albums"
Both of those albums are pretty underwhelming.
when beefheart died they did fuck all
>>64422475
≥Controversy a better album than Parade
>>64422914
Shit, that was an accident. I meant to say they'll give Controversy an 8.9/10.
Prince had aids.
Not clear who he got it from. Maybe Charlie Sheen.
>>64422547
>Around the World in a Day
>underwhelming
You're just wrong and suck cock by choice
>>64421456
what an absolutely retarded thing to whine about.
