Yea this one was kind of forgotten by time.

>>64418759
>>64419386
thats not Baby's in Black

>>64418759
That's not it's all too much

>>64418759
Thats not Rocky Raccoon

>any Beatles track
>underrated

pick one and only one.

It's All Too Much desu

It's like proto-shoegaze

Why cant you just post the title of the song? Why post a youtube video for a beatles track?
Definitely one of the most underrated though

>>64418759
That's not You Know My Name (Look Up the Number)

I can't stand their voices after being spoiled by the angelic earsex that is the Beach Boys for so many years. How do I get past it?

>>64418759
Im on mobile so cant link but theres a great mariachi version of this. Its a really pretty and sinple melody so its easy to cover. Its not underrated though.

And Your Bird Can Sing or Baby's In Black qualify. Maybe No Reply too.

I know /mu/ has an irrational hatred for him, but Cobain's acoustic version of this song is great.

>>64420418
It's nothing like shoegaze

>>64422670
It sounds like vacuums though so yes it is.

>>64422963
>you discuss music with these people

>>64423058
You better believe it sister

>>64421696
I noticed this too recently.

The vocals can be alright most of the time but when they try to do the doo wop harmonies it totally falls flat

>>64424824
That's due to shit taste. The Beatles' harmonies are rougher than The Beach Boys, but they are far more emotional.

>>64418759
That's not Long Long Long

>>64418759
that's not fool on the hill

>>64418759
That's not Oo You

>>64425117
hey now, I see what youre saying, but the beatles' harmonies are waaay more inconsistent