Is this true?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
Is this true?
>not a multi-instrumentalist
>makes absolutely generic pop/pop-country
>not a man
>doesn't believe she's on the top of the world
>hasn't changed her name to a symbol
I don't think so anon. She's missing a lot of key components.
she's Springsteen
>>64385983
yes
tay is bae
>>64386075
She isn't a tenth the songwriter Bruce is.
>>64386029
>guitar
>banjo
>keyboard
I think that's enough to make her technically a multi-instrumentalist. Still no comparison to Prince though since he was a technically brilliant guitarist and she is just adequate enough to service the types of songs she writes.
>>64386144
he's a hack anyway
>>64386029
What a misogynistic comment desu senpai
>>64386159
Fuck you.
No, she's Taylor Swift. She isn't a completely different human being.
No. There'll never be a new prince, or next springsteen. Just let Taylor be Taylor.
>>64386159
lol okay buddy
grimes is as close as we'll get to energetic pop that's really only about image.
and she's not even that good
(i'd totally watch an art angels movie tho)
>>64385983
What the fuck. Purple Rain alone has more merit than Swift's entire discography. Even as a cultural symbol, there's just no comparison.
I'm not even a huge Prince fan tbqh. I can just tell when the industry sees an opportunity to make money off of the legacy of an artist.
ladies and gentlemen, the new Prince
>>64386468
>not even that good
kys
>>64385983
Man I've seen her compared to Springsteen, Joni Mitchell and now Prince with literally nothing in common with them apart from being a famous musician. I don't get it.
>>64386150
>guitar
Just like the assholes playing 2 cords at campus claiming they're guitarists
That tweet is old and about her unwillingness to allow her music to be streamed
Critics have been anointing the next Dylan/Springsteen/Madonna for year. It never takes.
>>64386159
i'm triggered
>>64386075
Except no?
>>64385983
No. Miley Cyrus is closer to Prince than Taylor Swift is by a million years.
>>64387911
how
>>64388389
As an androgynous sex symbol and musician.
Well who is Taylor Swift now? Is she now the artist formally known as Taylor Swift?
>>64386163
>not understanding 70% of what I say is ironic.
>>64386163
Also I meant it to a joke
>>64389490
fuck you tripfag
>>64388637
more like the 'artist formally a male' taylor swift
