it wasn't very good, you can tell why they were cut from the album
it good
>we
who is we
also there was a bit of discussion about it when it came out. general consensus was that it"s okay, not really better or worse than PW
go to r/animalcollective if you want more discussion
Tbh gnip gnop was kinda cringe-worth but catchy. The second one was alright. But I'm an anco fanboy so what do I know
>>64357304
how is gnip gnop cringeworthy?
it's just a fun song with a little circus flare
Because Gnip Gnop was Wiggles-tier and Hounds of Bairro is only passable
>>64357510
It just sounds like a children's song. I hate to play into the meme, but it does sound like the intro to that kids show people shit post about. Like I said, it was catchy. Just rubbed me the wrong way I guess.
>>64358225
pretty sure the song was written to sound like that
>>64358251
>it's meant to be shit so it's okay
>>64357125
Is this the new fanboy and chum chum song?
>>64358354
hey, i think you've misunderstood what the arrows are for? they're for quoting a post. don't know if you noticed but you didn't quote the post correctly or even respond to it. just thought i'd let you know :)
>>64358354
that's definitely not what I said