At what point are you a "fan" of an artist?
For example, if the only Nirvana song your know and like Smells Like Teen Spirit, you really aren't a fan of the band, just their one megahit. Alternatively, if you like every Pink Floyd album without question, you can undoubtedly say that you are a Pink Floyd fan. Where is the middle point?
In order to say you are a fan, how invested in their music must you be? Like majority of their work, maybe?
>>64112225
who cares dude its just music
>>64112225
no way the majority
one album will do it if the band has less than 5
one plus anything else will do it in all circumstances
>>64112262
Just a curious thought I had at work today
when you're so insecure you need to attach part your identity to their image lmao
>>64112225
when i've listened to all of, or the majority of their albums or want to see them live/wish i could have seen them live.
>Joy Division
>tumblr
You may have a point there
>>64112359
>>64113775
Meant to quote
>>64112225
Listened to more than half of their albums.
>>64112262
No fun senpai
>>64112225
I only like Piper, Saucerful, and the live half of Ummagumma. Am I a PF fan?
>>64113858
heeeey those are my favorite too
>>64113858
yes.
and i agree with
>>64112313
You have to at least know one album pretty well. id say have listened to one of their full albums at least one time.
>>64112313
If you only like one album, and they have more than two, then I wouldn't say your a fan of the band. Just that album.
>>64114062
That's what I'm thinking. Realistically, if you like less than half of their material, you're not a fan. Maybe a fan of their "old" material (or whatever era they were/are making that music), but not of the band.
i'd say liking at least a few of their albums...might depend on the size of their discography
When you're capable of having a nuanced opinion of their albums.
