I find it quite amusing that almost all of the Beatles songs have their own entries on Wikipedia (nothing wrong with that in itself, actually), even if they are not singles, and each of them is meticulously dissected as if there were transcendental suites exceeding human comprehension, yet bands like Faust or Red Krayola, etc. have biographies even shorter than just one article about any random Beatles song. Needless to say, none of their songs have any articles on them, yet I'm sure there would be a lot more to talk about. Moreover, if you had put any bad review of their album on the site with the intention to show the broader scope of opinions, you'd risk your "life" there, since such fanatics don't accept any single sign of trying to be objective. You are seen as public enemy number 1 to them. It is like your article is one giant cognitive dissonance to them and vandalizing your bio was the only way to reduce this dissonance.
The Beatles were not a terribly interesting band, but their fans were and still are an interesting phenomenon. I can only name religious fundamentalists as annoying (and as threatening) as Beatles fans, and as persevering in sabotaging anyone who dares express an alternate opinion of their faith.
>>63763549
Why is he burning that Residents album?
>>63763549
Was Scaruffi secretely one of those kids?
>>63763549
It's a website written by the general public. Why is it a surprise that the most popular band would have the most written about it?
>>63763549
the beatles were a very interesting band, their story is so huge it's hard to believe it all happened in 8 years
>>63763674
they were a big band
>>63763578
worry no more he's not
>>63763549
>each of them is meticulously dissected as if there were transcendental suites exceeding human comprehension
(not true, by the way)
The fact that so many Americans still believe it should be illegal to marry a 12-year-old only tells you how far America still is from becoming a serious culture. The Europeans have long recognized that the greatest relationships of all times are between male adults and female adolescents, who are the most biologically fit to produce offspring, as well as the most physically attractive. Followers of the Muslim faith rank the highly controversial Aisha over all of their prophet Mohammed’s other wives, who were far past the prime age for reproduction. Americans are still blinded by puritan values. Adult females are more mentally developed than adolescents (not true, by the way), therefore they must be the greatest partners. Europeans engaged in relationships with adolescent European girls in the middle ages, radical Islamists engage in relationships with adolescent Muslim girls in the present. Americans are often totally ignorant of the virtues of relationships with adolescent girls, they barely know the biological benefits. No wonder they will think that sexual relations with 12-year-old girls should be criminalized.
>>63763693
K bill
>>63763693
For you
>>63763640
this, there isn't anything more to it
>>63763549
German quartet Banaroo delivered one of the most demented dance-pop anthems of all times, Dubi Dam Dam (2005). It was the only decent track on Banaroo's World (2005). The follow-up album was even worse. But that first anthem is a masterpiece.
>>63763712
holy fuck the album cover makes so much sense in that context
>>63763549
>yet bands like Faust or Red Krayola, etc. have biographies even shorter than just one article about any random Beatles song
Can't believe there are tons of Beatles stuff on the wiki, and just one dull unfinished article about modernism in music.
>>63763712
Lol.
>>63763712
"this album was made out of shock value, it's garbage"
Wikipedia is not a website dedicated to discussing music. It's literally just an encyclopedia, of course something as popular as the Beatles is gonna have a lot of documentation
