whats the opinion on him/his reviews
I feel like /mu/ stopped talking about him completely.
I stopped watching his videos a few months back, too.
melon
>looking for opinions on opinions
he should top reviewing rap shite
GO
BACK
TO
Melon headed Pitchfork drone that /mu/ stopped talking about until you brought him up again
If he likes what he's reviewing: relatively in-depth, gives some good information and analysis for people who don't listen to music much
If he dislikes what he's reviewing: absolute shit, shallow as hell, basically bitching about everything under the sun instead of actually reviewing the music, then reviewing the music in a very shallow way and clearly only 1 listen
he's hit-or-miss (miss more often than not)
i want him to gag on my cock
>him
fucking kek
>>63623706
I respect anyone's reasonable (non-shitpost) opinions, but his are terrible.
Scaruffi - 8/10
Prindle - 6/10
Pitchfork - 4/10
Christgau - 3/10
Fantano - 1/10
>>63623706
Here is a leaked script of 100 of Fantanos videos
This record is so [adjective]
This song is very [adjective]
[adjective][adjective][adjective][adjective]
It reminds me of [band of similar genre whose record came out first] i definitely see some influences of band of similar genre whose record came out first] but also early band of similar genre whose record came out first] [adjective] [adjective] [adjective]
He's alright. He can get preachy as fuck when it comes to veganism though.
Fantano is some /v/ tier meme shit and he's a fucking idiot
>>63623853
>[INSERT GENRE] influenced beats.
>>63623846
>Scaruffi
>Mr. "The Wall was better than Animals"
>8/10
Your opinion is wrong
>>63624186
>Dark Side of the Moon
>6,5
>>63623853
>watery synths
>lo-fi production
>poppy
>flat and one-dimensional
>>63624186
>the wall
>6.5
>animals
>6
By his standards The Wall should be getting a 2/10
>>63624186
Animals also sucks, and that's coming from someone who prefers prog to psychedelic pop in general.
It sounds like a less interesting version of Jethro Tull, they should have stuck with what they know.
Even if you disagreed, one rating doesn't make him a terrible reviewer
>>63624262
yeah, it should be a 3 at best.
Have you ever had an encounter with this man?
>>63624186
Jesus fuck he really underrates Meddle
>>63623853
>This is a really GRIMY, TRAP-FLAVORED instrumental
Anyone have his glow pt 2 vid