He's a very good drummer. Maybe not the best of all time but saying "he's not that good" or "he actually sucks" is contrarianism.

>>63613444
I am contesting only that he is considered "the best drummer of all time".

I know he's good, and so are at this point thousands of other drummers across nearly every genre of rock.

>>63613333
His playing techinque was very innovative for its time

>>63613333
A big part of why he's considered the very best is because of how big his drum kit is. People see 30-something piece kit and see that he plays it well and assume he must be the best even if they don't know very much about drumming.

>>63613693
That's an extremely superficial assessment or you're pretending to be retarded

>>63613693
are serious? or are you just retarded?

He's a good drummer but if he didn't have a good sounding kit he'd sound like shit
My point being if he was playing a 200$ set he wouldn't sound that good

>>63615213
Are there drummers for which that is not true? What makes the difference?

>>63615231
https://youtu.be/3SziF4mesPA

>>63615289
And you're telling me Neil Peart can't do that?

>>63615213

I disagree, the drumkit you're playing on matters, sure, but a great drumkit wont make a shit drummer better

He has fantastic stamina even in his old age.