Now that the dust has settled, what was /mu/ consensus about the lead single of one of the most anticipated albums of 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryh9rkIRGUs
>>63108527
Pretty good. Hyped for the album
>>63108527
Atleast they don't make the same album for the 10th time.
it's gonna be the Art Angels of 2016 with a lot of people saying it's too mainstream/sell out etc
not very hyped but will give the album a listen
This sounds like what Currents should have been. Stoked on for the album desu
What's their best work and why is it far and away this one?
>>63110477
its actually this though
Don't like desu, kinda sounds cheesy, just like the stupid cover.
>>63108605
>>63108605
top kek
>>63108628
It's not too mainstream/sellout but it sounds hilariously bad in my opinion. I know some of you guys are stoked but that piano sounds like it came out of the circus and those vocal filters are horrifyingly bad.
>>63110477
Marginally better than S=Y, and I own both on vinyl.
>>63108527
It's Junk.
>>63113487
damn
>>63108527
sounds like some solid pop music to me, really hoping for this to get on the radio
It sounds like future supertramp
which is nice, but I agree with >>63112528
as it does sound a bit cheesy
Sounds like some Sailor Moon shit combined with some mid-2000s indietronica, especially the latter part. Not bad but not exciting.
>>63108527
Anthony is so burnt out and self conscious after being made to produce a sub-standard overtly emotional sellout parody of his style for the Oblivion soundtrack.
He's trying to destroy all his own influences and be seen to not take himself seriously, which is why he wants to call his new record "Junk".
The dogs on the cover serve the same purpose as the dog you replace your spouse with after a breakup. I notice he's no longer touring with Morgan Kibby and is begging on social media for a new vocalist /keyboardist.
The single is bad.
>>63114118
Way to read way too into the visuals d00d
