It's at least an 8/10, it even received universal acclaim and Clocks and The Scientist are modern day classics. Fuck Pitchfork.
>>61882972
>It's at least an 8/10
its a very good 6.5
>Clocks and The Scientist are modern day classics
theyre not
this is coming from somebody that likes coldplay too but they were pretty right on the score but not the context of the score because its fucking pitchfork and their scores mean nothing
>rock music
>good
choose on
>>61882972
Not even close, it's a fucking poprock album that accomplishes nothing despite its fairly long runtime.
>>61883003
Hey contrarian here's your reply
>>61882972
seen a lot of Coldplay apologists as of late. now that normies are even getting sick of them is it like post-contrarianism. Is this an ironic meme?
They have a few okay songs I guess but their little more than a proficient pop rock outfit.
I saw some guy say they did shoegaze better than mbv's mbv earlier today unironically.
Rush of Blood is a legitimately good album so the
>hurr poprock
people are the contrarians here
>>61883003
Facts
This isn't even rock just some trash fufu music.
The real rockstars are rappers,these "rock" niggas dropping off the face off the earf with their overplayed garbage
>>61883088
Contrarians it seems like the majority think the album sucks shit,you're the contrarian dipshit.
>>61882972
Parachutes was good and Viva la Vida was great but Pitchfork is right about this one, It's little better than mediocre.
>>61883042
What are you talking about? This is a fantastic album. The production, song writing, overall emotion and even the cover art are all amazing. I don't get the hate. It's their best easily. Only hipster faggots disagree. Also, I would agree with that anon. It's easily better than that overrated album. Shoegaze is for emo teens. Coldplay has much better song writing.
>>61882996
Come on, it's definitely above that score. It's nearly flawless in my mind.
>>61883168
Nah, it's definitely much better than you're giving it credit.
>>61883390
Is this what has become of /mu/?
>>61883390
>Shoegaze is for emo teens
>>61883390
>>>/r/music
Go back to reddit.
>>61883580
>>61883600
>>61883610
Top tier arguments lads
>>61882972
Coldplay, Elbow and Travis are 3 bands I grew up with and I will always like their work
Pitchfork are retarded
>>61883665
>I have a nostalgic connection to band
>fuck pitchfork for not accomodating my taste and confirming my childhood
coldplay are just a shit u2 and chameleons
also i think montie is somewhere in this thread because he dropped his trip
>>61883710
>Defending Cuckfork
Kill yourself
>>61883747
I don't read pitchfork, but them not agreeing with you on an album is not a basis for calling them retarded, that's just you being a self-centred pleb who can't take other people's opinions.
>>61883390
please leave
I have never seen Pitchfork be as wrong as this one. It's easily one of the best albums of its year.
>>61882996
How can something be "very good" for its score?
Why not give it a higher score in that case?
>>61883390
holy shit
>>61883960
This is the one that pissed me off mostly in recent years.
it got panned by near enough everyone and I've not heard one solid argument for why it's not one of the best albums of 2014.
is there any way we can delete this board
>>61884378
It's like cancer, you can't just get rid of it, you have to go through chemo and radio-therapy, and then cut it out through a complex operation.
>>61884355
I've never seen a solid argument for why It's a good album
>>61884425
>can't get rid of it
>describes how to get rid of it
>>61884444
Nice quints.
Also, nobody on /mu/ is ready to put in the effort to fix this shit.
>>61883600
Dubs confirm that OP needs to off himself before he causes more buffoonery
>>61884492
im ready desu
give me my orders senpai
>>61884525
1. Get good taste
2. Berate those with bad taste
3. Promote good discussion
Good luck, you'll need it.
>>61883390
if half of your defenses for this album are production and cover art maybe its just shit
>>61884442
>good pop/rock songwriting
>interesting instrumentation (especially the lo-fi electronic experimentation)
>human sadness
>modern synth-punk/neo psych
>decent lyrics
yeah it has it's weak moments but it's generally a good LP
>>61884301
I think the guy just probably 7uses a .5 scale. Not every album that's a 6/10 is exactly equal for me, there are definitely albums I like more than others in that group. So it's likely just his favorite album in the 6.5 range that isn't quite a 7
What is a "classic" and why is it important? What does calling something a "classic" actually entail?
>>61883390
>Underage
wow, nexy your gonna tell me The Killers should be talked about more often, go listen to decent 2000- music like the Books, Deerhoof, Yo La Tengo, Flips, Sigur Ros, Monade, Low, Zammuto and Fiery Furnaces. Normie.
when is p4k right?
>>61884355
>>61883960
It got panned because it has Julian Casablancas but it's not a Strokes album, sadly.
Honestly, I think it's better than 95% of the stuff The Strokes ever made, easily 9/10 album.
>>61886069
same. If it's not a Strokes album, P4K don't want to know. No doubt it's because they weren't paid enough
i thought we all already agreed pitchfork is bullshit
>>61883390
Montie put your fucking trip back on you chipmunk fucking faggot so I don't have to read your stupid fucking opinions.
>>61886302
>Being so afraid of reading different opinions that you go out of your way to filter them.
Why do you want 4chan to be a hugbox?
>>61882972
>They gave fucking Mylo Xyloto a 7
Come on, you can't excuse this
>>61883390
Wow, you sure got hipsters here mad
>ITT: People unironically discussing coldplay in 2016 and not realizing that they are the greatest joke of all
>>61882972
Pitchfork usually rates everything really high so they wanted to throw something under the bus.
I guarantee that if Coldplay never got famous or made any money all you hipster faggots would love it and it would be /mu/core
>>61885069
damn this is some next level subtle bait, i like it
