I mean it's a compilation album, but it's good nonetheless, right?
It's good if you like it. :)
>>61134703
Best compillation album of all time
Compillations are great if they contain new original songs or B-sides
It's practically an enhanced version of their debut because Morrissey didn't like their debut.
smiths are a single band so compilation for them are good like for queen
>>61134734
>smiths are a single band
Not true at all
>>61134723
I agree. Typical best-of albums with only overplayed singles are trash, but ones with rare recordings are fantastic.
>>61134745
yes it is
their albums are still great tho
>>61134734
>>61134745
I can barely think of a band that had so many succesful and acclaimed singles
IN 5 YEARS
They are the ultimate singles band
>>61134903
beatles
/thread
>>61134703
Oasis>Stone Roses>Smiths
>>61134703
Actually I know one album that compares to it
>>61134903
REM did it longer
>>61134903
I wish more bands released singles that weren't on upcoming albums that are actually good
>>61135714
REM had a few duds in their career, while Smiths had flawless run
>>61135659
>>61134703
frankly any album composed of Smiths songs is one of the best albums of all time
>>61134703
>I mean it's a compilation album
So?
It's an "inferior" recording based on that? Fucking rockists
>>61135725
honestly in the age of the download you'd think singles would have more traction
