What do your music listening setups look like /mu/? Share, rate and rec/give ideas to others.
nice pc specs? and tech n9ne
>>60845891
>posting listening setup without showing speakers
>>60845891
rich fucker...
The record player and the cassette player are hooked up to my computer.
>>60846953
Holy crap, what a collection desu!
>>60846953
>that collection but listens through his computer.
WHY HAS GOD ABANDONED ME
>tfw no physical collection
Listen through Cambridge 351a amp/DAC and monitor audio BX2s
>>60846953
>not showing speakers
>>60847334
I kinda wish I could just let go of my attachment to the physical media of CDs and records. It's too fuckin expensive and it should really be about the music shouldnt it?
>>60847271
>Muh stairstepping
>>60847271
And why not?
Here a of of mine from a couple months ago, the record collection has increased a bit since then, but this gets the point across.
Thinking about buying this but need some advice if its a decent make and model or should i invest in something else?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00OD2I5L2/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pd_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=25QVU9OXOH42O&coliid=I4VTXX65CWQRE
>>60848955
Go for it
>>60848955
I hate to piss on your chips m8 but thats about the worst thing you could possibly buy. way too cheap, built in speakers, ceramic cartridge, everything that could be wrong with it is wrong with it.
the fact is, assuming you need everything ie record player, amp and speakers, you need to spend about 3 times that amount to get anything worth having, and thats buying 2ndhand. if you went on ebay and spent ~£80 on a record player, £50-60 on an amp and ~£50-60 on speakers, all 2ndhand, you could get a nice little system.
>>60848955
Please listen to >>60849093 or read the 1 star Amazon reviews. Do not do that to yourself. Spend a little more if you insist on buying new and get an lp60. It doesn't have a counterweight but the cartridge is better and the tonearm is already set for most records. As long as you don't plan on listening to any given album tons of times on it you won't damage them before you can upgrade to a better model. The best entry level player imo is the lp120 but that appears to be out of your price range. You'd be better off going to look for second hand turntables honestly. Just read Yelp reviews and check store policies on returns to know where to buy and read guides on Google to know what to look for.
>>60847351
CDs have no merit in today's world. Once you rip them to your computer (and backup somehow) they basically become useless. Although it's still nice to have a CD collection on your shelf.
Records have merit because they offer a different experience to digital. I have a shit load of high quality vinyl rips, and I did my own comparison for one (Nevermind - Nirvana).
It was digital (my own flac CD rip) vs vinyl rip vs vinyl (same pressing/mastering of rip and my vinyl). My turntable is pretty shitty and far worse than the one the vinyl was ripped on but my vinyl came out far ahead. I was kinda disappointed desu because I prefer the ease of all digital but the sound difference was undeniable.
>>60848844
>blocking driver
Only temporary until I get my shit more put together.
But go ahead, ridicule me.
>>60849511
>CDs have no merit in today's world. Once you rip them to your computer (and backup somehow) they basically become useless.
my CD player sounds a lot better than my computer's onboard sound
>>60849704
haha this man has no shelves or a table to put this in!
hahahaha
oh man, AND it's december and you have it next to the vent throwing off all that heat since you no doubt live in the midwest!
that's really gonna work wonders for your speakers and receivers!
aaaaaaaaaaaahhahah
>>60849758
FLAC files blow CDs out of the water, anon.
>>60849772
>I actually live in Florida so it's constantly throwing out cool air.
Kinda works.
Turntable: Pro-Ject Essential II
Amp: NAD C326BEE
CD Player: Aiwa DX-1500
Speakers: PSB Alpha Series Bookshelf
>>60849775
flac files are most often CD rips you silly person
and Im talking about replay hardware anyway not the media
>>60849816
That's a kickass turntable, my man.
I have an audio-technica like poor anon >>60849704
>>60849820
Oh, I see.
Carry on.
>>60849758
You can get an outboard USB DAC with a better DAC than your CD player for cheaper.
This is why CDs have no merit aside from the initial transfer of data.
>>60849775
You just made the most uniformed post on /mu/ today
>>60849897
no I cant. my cd players quite good
Ive got a dac which I use to play computer through stereo and my cd player still sounds better
I miss this setup
>>60849996
what happened to it
also that saddle isnt on straight
>>60849996
comfy looking house fampai
>>60849974
Then get a better DAC. It's digital. There is no reason why a CD player would sound better.
>>60850044
theres nothing wrong with the dac it sounds good, its just not as good as my cd player. why should I spend a fortune on new kit I dont need
>its digital
digital things have differences in sound you know, thats why people get offboard dacs in the first place. mobo sound is digital and a lot of it sounds properly shit. if all digital things sounded identical we could all use ancient mp3 players or something
>>60849824
Thanks man, the LP60 is fine for a bit but once you have the cash get your ass a decent turntable.
>>60850170
What's the main difference?
I've ripped a few LPs to my computer with it and they sound amazing.
Is it more of an aesthetic thing?
>>60850130
What I'm saying is that CD players don't have some magic component in them that will make them sound better than all other digital playback methods
>>60849996
comfy 2003
>>60850238
I never said that tho did I, just that theres good sounding digital replay kit and not so good sounding kit. like theres good cd players and not so good cd players. my cd player is good and sounds great and its a hell of a lot better than my mobo sound and its also better than the dac I use to play computer through stereo, though not by the same margin. which is why I often play cds on the cd player in preference to files from the computer rather than just ripping them and leaving them on the shelf. ofc I play stuff off the computer too because Ive dld so much music that I dont have on cd
>>60850203
It doesn't have a counterweight and the weight of the cartridge can't be adjusted. It's fine if you don't use it too often but over time it does wear down on the record. And some records will skip on that turntable that don't have scratches on them. I had a cheap USB turntable and some of my brand new records would skip always in the same spots, but were clean on my new one. And yes it does sound fine, but you will notice the difference as soon as you upgrade.
>>60849816
What shelf is that shelf?
>tfw recently moved to a foreign country and didn't brought my setup with me
>>60850587
Okay, thanks.
I'll remember the one you have if I ever do buy a new one.
>>60850639
Its an Ikea Expedit or Kallax
theyre p much the same, the Kallax replaced the Expedit when they stopped making it
Hooked to krks
>>60850031
I moved recently .The place I'm in now isn't as comfy senpai
>>60850639
>>60850782
This guy nailed it, Ikea Kallax glossy white.
>>60851028
you could make it comfy w/ more soft things and stuff on the walls
btw you appear to have girls on your sofa
>>60849653
If the biggest complaint you have about my setup is a tiny ceramic carp sitting a foot in from of one speaker, I'm taking that as a massive compliment to my set up. Thanks senpai.
>>60851028
Get some speaker stands dude
I recommend milk crates if you're OK with the trash aesthetic
>>60851227
I supose I could just build something basic too.
>>60851028
L O N D O N
O
N
D
O
N
The best ITT t b h
>>60851340
Yeah, but seriously you'll notice a big difference when the speakers are at ear level, literally the cheapest upgrade with the most noticeable difference. If you're usually sitting on the couch listening, go for like 2' stands.
>>60851028
How do you still have one of these TVs?
and post some drawings senpai:)
>>60851525
even if they're floor speakers? I'll take your word for it. Thanks friend
they could probably do w/ a bit more distance between them too desu
they might sound better if they were about here
doing a house showing right now, there's females in my house and I'm scared, so I'm blasting some Ornette Coleman and hiding out in the basement
>>60851650
For sure. Also I can't really see, but if they're right against the wall that's another no-no, pull them out a bit so they have room to breathe.
>>60851856 this guy's got the right idea
>>60849511
>prefers vinyl
>believes ripping CD to computer is only way to use CD
It's dumb trendy fucks like you that are bringing vinyl back. Fine by me, I enjoy CD's getting cheaper and cheaper.
How about this; listen to a physical CD and compare it to a vinyl. You'll notice CD's sound much more pristine and emaculate.
>>60852002
>Swans
>Jesus and marry chain
>Joy Division
Pretty amazing taste my man!
Rega Planar 2
80's JVC amp
Pioneer speakers
You guys are making me jealous. These headphones plus an iPad is all I got...
sup /mu/
>>60852278
What the album on the right next to Live?
>>60852973
The latest Dungen album, highly recommended!
>>60852855
good hphones tho
dont be sad :/
![20151206_133702[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/pH62Nrl.jpg "20151206_133702[1].jpg")
My setup is pretty simple.
>>60853509
Crow, do you use any kind of DSP room correction or anything?
>>60852855
>i aint even got proper headphones
How much do you want to bet this photo is gonna be sideways when I upload it
>>60853509
nice turtle
>>60853680
tortoise
>>60853584
i can see your boards of canada records
>>60853634
nope
>>60853680
tortoise
ty
>>60853584
toilet paper?
>>60853670
$-10000 ;)
like if u agree
![20151206_135538[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/fvw0ME8.jpg "20151206_135538[1].jpg")
>>60853713
Here's a shitty phone pic of my whole collection.
>>60853763
There wasn't enough room in my bathroom.
Been wanting to get into vinyl for a while now and got all this stuff second hand from old family friends. Looking all the stuff up on ebay and such tells me that this is one cheap-ass setup.
Turntable's a JVC AL-A155 and it does not have a counterweight. I'm planning on upgrading eventually, but how many plays will it take for this fucker to completely destroy my records? Is it Crosley tier?
In the south here, so fireplace is just for looks.
I just got all my gear within the last two weeks, Today I'll run all the cables to a strip behind the pc (also for looks...) and get the floor cleared up.
Are the speakers fine wrt height and separation?
Using the boxes they came in for now, might build some shelving over holiday, just need to decide if I want them on the hearth or the floor.
>>60845891
You have the organization skills of a serial killer.
>>60854058
nah youre good, its not a record eater
it isnt adjustable, but its a P-mount so its set at a sensible tracking weight, I think its 1.5 or 1.75g. it wont wear your records any faster than any other deck so long as your stylus is in good condition
you could even upgrade it if you wanted, audio technica and grado make good quality p mount carts
>>60854058
Looks like it does have a counterweight, and it's a P-mount cart, which is okay, but there are very few good of these available nowadays. I say stick with it.
>>60849816
I have the same turntable and amp. Got the white turntable though
>>60846793
there's certainly cheaper options than earphones that break after half a year though
Ignore the synonym rolls
>>60854417
omg now i want cake
>>60854257
>>60854344
Thank you! I knew it was a p-mount, but I didn't realize that a player can have a non-adjustable counterweight and be alright.
It has a audio-technica cartridge, maybe someone replaced the original at some point.
>>60854417
can you jizz on my buns too?
>>60853584
What exact setup do you have?
>>60854103
>Are the speakers fine wrt height and separation?
Make sure the tweeter is at ear height relative to your seating position.
As for separation, you want to sit equidistant from how far apart the speakers are. So if they're 4 feet apart, sit from them.
>>60854484
The thing with Crosleys is that they use ceramic carts, which other than being fixed into the tonearm permanently, they have heavy as fuck tracking force. Moving magnets carts are much much lighter (DJing cartridges are an exception, they're a bit heavy on records).
>>60854691
It's a Technics SL-D3 with a Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi HD preamp. It's really unreliable, so I plan on replacing it with pic related.
>>60845891
Nice turntable but drop the digital receiver and go analog...you can get rid of the sub and get much better sound.
Very happy with how it is currently, my TT is a Technics SL-1700, and my receiver is an old pioneer sa-500, not super top of the line shit but I dont care, it sounds great
>all those turntables
Enjoy your low fidelity, retards.
>>60854965
lol
>>60854965
;^)
>>60854484
yeah p mounts are like the one exception to the rule. theres nothing wrong with them at all, the only drawback is you dont have the same amount of choice replacing the cart but you can still get good ones
>>60854888
dogge detected
how can i have mistyped the captcha when i click the lakes and get the green tick
>>60855022
>>60855039
lol ;^)
Seriously though, put more research effort into your next purchase decision.
>>60854704
Thanks.
I usually work from the couch but also move closer to the tv for gaming. It's only a few feet difference, so I'll play around with it and see if I need to change anything.
>>60855133
But vinyl is hi-fi, what are you talking about
>>60855177
Noise, pops, wow and jitter is not hi-fi.
>>60849816
Are those 7" records in the Stella pack?
>>60855301
Sure if you have a shitty ass Crosley or Jensen.
>>60855348
Any non-laser turntable is going to produce record wear and degrade the sound quality each time a record is played.
>>60855301
>jitter
so long as you know what youre talking about then
lel
>>60855054
This is rotated, right?
>>60855510
nah, i like them stacked like that so it's easier to see the labels
>>60855496
Meant flutter.
Good job not being as braindead as everyone else in this thread.
>>60855574
What's the point of your shitposting here? What do you expect to win from this. Fidelity is not the only reason to own vinyl.
>>60855510
yep
>>60855574
youre the braindead one
you get flutter (which is a high frequency speed instability) on tape decks not turntables, where the natural inertia of the platter prevents it
go shitpost somewhere else dickhead
>>60855667
I'm just replying to people replying to me. Everyone else is shitposting as much as I am.
>>60855700
>(which is a high frequency speed instability)
It's any variation in pitch or phase which is not present in the recording. A common flaw in vinyl playback.
>>60851028
w2c girls?
Vinyl is high-fidelity. Take if from hard-line audio objectivist Peter Aczel.
>The principal determinants of sound quality in a recording produced in the last 60 years or so are the recording venue and the microphones, not the downstream technology. The size and acoustics of the hall, the number and placement of the microphones, the quality and level setting of the microphones will have a much greater influence on the perceived quality of the recording than how the signal was captured—whether on analog tape, digital tape, hard drive, or even direct-to-disk cutter; whether through vacuum-tube or solid-state electronics; whether with 44.1-kHz/16-bit or much higher resolution. The proof of this can be found in some of the classic recordings from the 1950s and 1960s that sound better, more real, more musical, than today’s average super-HD jobs. Lewis Layton, Richard Mohr, Wilma Cozart, Bob Fine, John Culshaw, where are you now that we need you?
Format is WAY down on the list. The most important determinant is indeed how the music was recording/mixed/mastered. Then speakers. Then room acoustics. Then amplification. Then transport.
Even the lowly cassette can sound just as good as a CD on a good playback system, especially through a player that can minimize tape hiss (like a Nakamichi).
Hand wringing over format is futile. As long as your records are clean and not damaged, the differences in fidelity will be inaudible.
Focus more on proper speaker positioning or something.
>>60856003
>As long as your records are clean and not damaged, the differences in fidelity will be inaudible.
That's the thing. They get damaged when they are in use.
>Focus more on proper speaker positioning or something.
Agreed. People should fix their speaker positioning and give their rooms some acoustic treatment before replacing their ancient technology turntables. Only about half of the posters got it right.
Just ignore him
>>60856155
>They get damaged when they are in use.
None of the "damage" will be audible until thousands and thousands of plays. Even then, a better mastered version of the LP version will sound leagues better than than its poorly mastered equivalent.
The primary reason "audiophiles" have a turntable in their setup is because the best mastered versions of countless albums are still on LP, and will probably always be on LP considering the master tapes have probably degraded or are lost, etc.
I take it your criticism is focused at modern vinyl releases, but you usually get a digital version with your purchase anyway.
>>60845891
Hi
>>60856534
>None of the "damage" will be audible until thousands and thousands of plays.
Depends on the needle being used.
>Even then, a better mastered version of the LP version will sound leagues better than than its poorly mastered equivalent.
Doesn't mean you have to use a turntable to listen to it. Just get your hands on a vinyl rip instead.
rega RP1 record deck
Marantz PM5004 amp
Marantz CD5004 cd player
Q Acoustic 2010i speakers (need an upgrade)
and Phillips Fidelio M1 headphones
Don't have space for a proper cassette deck, so just have one of them shitty portable ones.
Rate? Also have my tapes in a little box on the wall above the white box w my 7's
>>60856849
>Just get your hands on a vinyl rip instead.
You have no idea if they used a shitty Ion turntable to archive it or a VPI. Or what condition their copy was in, etc.
>>60856832
How does the Deaf Grapes sound on that?
>>60857014
exposed wires/10
>>60857019
Yes I do.
>>60857164
Yeah, but there's uploads where no info is provided.
But it's good people are archiving in any event. That's also another reason to own a turntable, if you're interesting in doing that. A lot records wasting away at thrift stores and flea markets.
I have some CDs and a few a vinyls, but most of my music is on the computer.
>>60857506
love your drum set
>>60857506
I do enjoy a simple drum kit.
>>60857603
>>60857657
Thanks.
Bass drum used to be a tom.
Need a cow bell.
>>60846793
same
legit headphones that were a buck a single dollar. they last as long as 16$ they just sound like shit and leak sound like crazy.
i also get the dollar 1$$$ coffee any size at mcdonalds in the morning and puit some 1$$ creamer in it i keep in my car. im a 1$ kinda guy. all about those washingtons
pic is me lookin up who was on the one dollar bill cause i actually forgot. dont hate 4 usin google im sorry.
I like bass
This is mine
>>60858132
is that Richard d James peeking out on the far left bottem?
>>60858621
Sure is!
>>60858132
> The guide-light on the LP-120
I don't get it, how exactly am I supposed to use that light? The cartridge is only lit by it when the arm is on the inside of the record, nowhere near where I cue up a record to start.
Also a quick question - should the cartridge, while playing, be bobbing along the record? Not violently, but the arm itself kinda bobs and weaves but there's no distortion in the sound.
>>60854043
Which pressing of SAW II is this? How does it sound?
>>60845891
I got the same case
What turntable is that seems nice
>>60858656
i have the same question, it only does this with a few of my records (all my king crimson LP's look like they wave on the record)
>>60849799
>Florida
Fuck you it's in my head again.
Getting my first turntable in on tuesday. Perty excited.
>>60858702
Enjoy the setup, I was sweating profusely during mine.
>>60854103
>>60854103
This was mine, went with the LP-120 despite liking the minimalism of the U-Turn much better. I went with the inconvenience of amazon though, but it's working out alright.
>>60855337
Yes they are
>>60857833
love vintage peavey gear bro
>>60851100
Judging from the hammer sitting on the couch, that would appear to be on the way. Either that or some really metal shit
>>60858666
It's a fairly recent reissue. It sounds pretty good.
>>60858656
the guide light is to make sure the turntable is spinning the right speed
>>60852230
>much more pristine and emaculate.
>>60854888
thats dope man +1 for dog
>>60858132
nice mpp
I'm so sick of this, any ideas?
>>60860134
Yes. Swap the desk and the bookcase so you have a view and half the bookcase is usable rather than dead space.
>>60860717
I think I will, don't know where to put them though
>>60850782
>the Kallax replaced the Expedit when they stopped making it
They stopped making Expedits? What? What are the differences?
>>60860134
Those drawings are really neat. Tell whoever made them.
>>60849816
Framed records? Joe's garage is great senpai
>>60860935
not really that much of a difference, just different models
>>60860965
They both came with limited edition records desu. One is of Mac Demarco and it came with the limited edition salad days press and the other is from the limited press of Homeshake's In The Shower.
It's a work in progress. The motor on my belt drive of my old Technics table started acting weird so I'm currently replacing the table, the receiver's an old Marantz SR2000, the speakers are some old kenwood shit, I plan on cleaning up all the wires this week. Also santa hat for festivities
(Pic 1/2)
Main part of my setup
Stanton T90 turntable
Sansui AU G99x amp
And a shitty Sony sound system to play cds, cassettes and aux
>>60861389
(Pic 2/2)
The crappy speakers I have, also have an old set of pioneers but they need to be refoamed>>60861389
>>60857506
What speakers are those? Looks familiar, but I can't put my finger to it.
>>60861389
>>60861485
I don't know anything about turntables, but I do think they look awesome. Reminds me of the times I spend as a kid with grandma, listening to her records.
I can't justify the cost right now though, just bought these speakers, so toy-money is tight for a while.
>>60860134
Nice draws
>>60851415
>output through guitar amp
why?
>>60851028
smash that girl's head with the hammer over there.
>>60857014
Get a large rug for the floor, those tiles will be fucking with your sound, otherwise pgud
Hey so in my setup up I'm having a problem I got a receiver from my dad's house it's from like the 70's and every time the treble is even grazed all audio is either cut off or becomes insanely loud. Do you think it's just a loose wire or if I have to get a new receiver and if so any good ones
>>60861669
>tannoy
I like your style. Someday in the future I want something from the prestige line. I've heard in store kensingtons and turnberrys. But my klipsch will have to do until then :/
Anyone have experience with the Sherwood PM9805?
>>60862723
It's probably the potentiometer (the dial) bugging out. If your handy with soldering iron you should be able to sort it out yourself, otherwise take it to a hifi repair place, this will probably be cheaper than replacing it.
>>60859288
Nah - the guide light commonly called a target light is for stylus placement. The strobe on the power switch housing is for platter speed.
>>60862807
Thanks man I'll check it out later
>>60860134
is that a homeshake fan art or is there a story behind that?
>>60854417
nice jizz buns 10/10 would eat
>>60849816
whats that thing holding madvilliany?
>>60857833
sick
whats a good entry level amplifier/ equalizer ? anything good for less than $100 ?
>>60857774
this is a good post
>>60863518
Second hand gear is the best place to start, new hifi gear only starts getting decent above $200
Question for all you people with the sweet setups: Do you guys or girls use any sound-proofing methods, like acoustic foam?
>>60849996
nice bike senpai
>>60863613
any names to look out for second hand?
>>60863688
Nah. I don't play records that loud. I would like be able to play some drone really loud but I can just use headphones.
>>60863713
onkyo and pioneer
>>60863713
>>60863796
Also 80s or earlier Sansui, NAD and Luxman.
>>60864411
that comics collection damn. you got anything good in there?
>>60864448
I really like my original ec comics
>>60864411
is that sticker from homer's in omaha?
>>60864585
Yes
>>60864757
lol i go there all the time
4 chan flips it but you get the idea
dorm room setup. MacBook Pro > NAD C 326BEE > Bowers & Wilkins CM5 + ASW610. way outside my budget but i found a kickass deal on craigslist for all three speakers.
>>60854888
>>60849816
damn nice
>>60846953
sell me that pg99 trucker hat
>>60861669
Polk Monitor 30
>>60849511
Hipsters like you would prefer cassettes to cds since you think it would have more of a use (which is not true btw, you can easily rip vinyl and cassettes, but they won't sound as good as a cd rip and are therefore inferior to cds)
>>60849816
Those spines are gonna get sun faded, get some blackout curtains.
>>60851415
>Tiny amount of cds, records, and tapes.
>Best ITT
Kek'ed hard.
Some photos:
>>60866455
>>60866471
>>60866455
>>60866471
>>60866496
I bet this room smells like spaghettios.
>>60866571
Not sure what that means, haven't eaten those in like 5 years.
>>60853584
No outer record sleeves? Hope you enjoy records with damaged covers kek.
I need a new turntable
>>60851856
why is there a nail hammer on that couch?
>>60861669
Nice backscratcher.
Re-up
I only have anime soundtracks on vinyl.
>>60855946
>>60862492
no.
lets chill
>>60853653
Is that boxxy?
>>60860134
Maybe not have all your furniture mounted on the wall facing upwards. It doesn't result in the most comfortable sitting position.
>>60848844
putting your speakers literally right next to your record player on the same shitty ikea shelf. How does that even work?
Thats it. Plus Audio-Technica ATH-M20X and shitty pc.
Also sony and audio-technica earphones sounds pretty solid.
Tape:
Teac A-460
Onkyo TA-RW313
Pre:
Marantz 3600
Power:
Proton 1200
Yamaha RX-V690
Phono:
Project Debut Carbon - 2M Blue / Acrillic
Speakers (Wired in Parallel):
JBL Century L-100
Polk TSI 200
Custom built that Cabinet in the workshop.
Overall Pretty happy with the setup, however the speakers are way too big for my room and very poorly placed. Still sounds great when they get some power though.
>>60869906
speakers
>>60858693
as long as you have the counter weight properly adjusted you'd be fine. you did though right ?
>>60845891
A bit messy and a bit cramped
One day I'll move out of my parents house and have a dope setup. One day...
>>60860134
some color would probably be nice
Is that a window in front of the desk or like a blackboard or something?
maybe have the desk face the window if it isnt
Anything in particular you don't like?
>>60867037
>Nice backscratcher.
Thanks, I get that a lot. It's extendable and everything, I love it and use it quite often.
>>60866160
So not something I've seen before after all, thanks!
>>60862767
I hadn't heard (harhar) of Tannoy before, when I was looking for new speakers I had my eye on another set, but after demo'ing them (and liking em a lot) the shopkeeper then switched to these, and the difference was so ridiculous I pretty much bought em on the spot. He also had another bookshelf set that cost almost 3x as much, and the difference between them and these Tannoys was not nearly as big.
Quite a lot of money for me (with amp & cables the total was a little over €1100), but I haven't regretted it for a single moment since I got em a month ago.
>>60860935
>shelf
slightly different sizes
fucking annoying if you have them next to each other desu
My based set up, I have a Technics SL1200 not pictured.
