>Not on Rolling Stone's top 50 albums of 2015...
How fucking dreck like Blur and Selena Gomez got on the list is beyond me.
why do you want every single list to be composed of the same shit
besides sufjan is trash
amazed that any of you actually care about fucking rolling stone
>>60746992
>Rolling Stone
Just makes the album more credible then
Ok wtf is this.
>Rolling Stone gives CRJ's Emotion a 3.5/5
>Its 48th on the list
>Gives C&L a 4/5
>Not on the list
>>60747028
>le blur are shite meme
>>60746992
In the first place this album is incredibly dull and boring. Why anyone cares about it is beyond me.
Also, Rolling Stone have been irrelevant since the 80s. Why do you care so much about them?
>>60747140
>In the first place this album is incredibly dull and boring.
Well, most people would disagree with you on that one.
>Why do you care so much about them?
I don't. But its just a glaring omission on their part. As I said in my other comment, even albums that they themselves gave lower ratings that C&L made it onto the list. That's just retarded.
This album is only good live
>Rolling Stone's top 50 albums of 2015...
>>60746992
I haven't taken rolling stone seriously, since I was thirteen. I'm 20 now for reference.
Seriously though, if you look at a lot of there lists, they have a strong bias towards dadrock and top 40 crap.
>>60746992
Bastards
Rolling Stone is pandering to the mainstream. The only difference between now and the 60s is that popular music was more likely to be actually good back then.
>Drake, Adele, Weeknd in top 5
>Sufjan not in top 50
Sufjan confirmed for shit
>>60747140
>In the first place this album is incredibly dull and boring. Why anyone cares about it is beyond me.
So edgy I swallowed razor blades.
it wouldn't be on my top 50 either.
it's good for lists to differ.
different sites/publications cater to different demos.
might as well complain that SOPHIE didn't make their list.
who caaaaares.
