which is better
>>60481664
kind of blue>TVU&N>DSotM>ITCOTCK>Ok Computer>Paranoid>POWER GAP>Led Zeppelin 4>Loveless>Abbey Road
>>60481664
Kind of Blue shouldn't be on there, it has nothing similar to them. Might as well put other posercore like Music for 18 Musicians.
TVU&N > Abbey Road > ITCOTCK > Loveless > OKC > 5.0 = LZIV = Paranoid > DSOTM
>>60481745
I would have used Pet Sounds, but Kind of Blue is the superior record.
>>60481664
King Crimson > MBV > TVU > Pink Floyd > Led Zep > Radiohead > Kind of Blue > Black Sabbath > Beatles
>>60481780
>but Kind of Blue is the superior record
It isn't though, it has nothing to do with Pet Sounds or any of the other albums stylistically, harmonically, etc.
>>60481827
Why can't you compare jazz and rock?
>>60481857
the same reason you can't compare classical and progressive rock
you can draw lines of influence but the culture, the practice, the standards; everything is different
stop being a basic /mu/ bitch who only listens to token jazz and classical
TVU&N
Loveless
Paranoid
---POWER GAP---
In the Court of the Crimson King
OK Computer
Abbey Road
---POWER GAP---
Kind of Blue
Led Zeppelin IV
The Dark Side of the Moon
>>60481911
You need to calm down, sperglord. Of Course you can compare them.
>>60481975
You haven't explained how.
Abbey Road is by far the worst, I'll tell you that much
>>60482313
There, I fixed it for you.
Why kind of blue instead of bitches brew?
Why VU&nico instead of WL/WH?
Why Abbey Road instead of Revolver?
Why Dark Side instead of echoes?
just why?
>>60482418
because not everyone enjoys being a pretentious hipster
>>60481664
no one cares
>>60482473
>those albums
>pretentious
Pleb spotted.
>>60482418
Name of the album is meddle, not echoes
>>60481664
The gross banana
>>60481664
Kind of blue, obviously
Also weird selection, and why is The Velvet Underground in here? It has to be one of the most boring overestimated unoriginal band rock has ever produced
>>60482418
Meddle was meh. Dark Side is definitely over rated. There best was animals.
Loveless
>>60482503
no, the fact that you feel the need to point their "superiority" compared to the more popular ones makes you pretentious, not the albums.
>>60482621
I wasn't even the one who made that post.
If you think those albums are inaccesible by any means you should listen to more music.
or If not, then I wonder the reason you think it's pretentious to point their superiority.
>>60482673
>WLWH
>BB
>not undeniably more inaccessible than the OP
You're an idiot.
>>60482745
I never said they weren't more inaccessible than the OP, I said they weren't inaccessible (Meaning they are not notoriously inaccesisble).
Official scores coming through.
TVU&N > Paranoid > Untitled > ItCotCK > Kind of Blue > Abbey Road > DSotM > Loveless > OK Computer
>>60482814
OK Computer is a 5?? What?
>>60483005
I fail to see what's so great about it.
>>60483285
It takes inspiration from all those other albums in the OP and combines them together to make the best album.
>>60483498
I guess so
To me it just sounds like an inferior version of things that have already been done 30 years prior.
Does anyone else cringe when someone 'corrects' someone else or posts 'official' scores for these kinds of threads? Like they're actually so delusional and full of themselves that they think their subjective opinion is the actual universal ranking on this shit
>>60483894
>actually thinking music is subjective
>>>/pleb/
Abbey Road > Dark Side > In The Court > Paranoid >The Velvet Underground & Nico > OK Computer > Led Zeppelin IV > Loveless
A Kind Of Blue can't be included in this ranking
Most of these albums are perfect. Nothing wrong with them. But out of all of them Abbey Road is the best imho.
>>60483852
it only improved on them as the technology got better