ITT: albums that were panned to shit and literally trashed by pitchfork and fantano but you still like them anyway desu
>>60295035
>>60295035
>>60295035
But Fantano gave this a respectable 7 and liked it.
>>60295099
but 7 is so fuckin low tho, I mean it might as well gotten 2 or 3 at that point. I kinda feel ashamed to listen to it now
THIS THREAD IS TRASH
>>60295141
your fucking trash delete your post and hella gettouta here son
>>60295129
7 out of 10 is good.
This thread is kek.
i hate melontango with a passion but 6.5 or 7 is kinda suitable. The album is backloaded as fuck and i hate what she did to realiti even though its still enjoyable. belly of the beat and california are pretty forgettable, and flesh without blood has that corny guitar riff that kind of kills the vibe for me. its still solid but its being memed to death and virally marketed throughout the internet. Also visions and halfaxa were better
>8.5 BNM
>trashed
>>60295129
C R I N G E
R
I
N
G
E
>>60295099
>but 7 is so fuckin low tho, I mean it might as well gotten 2 or 3 at that point.
the p4k effect
here's an idea - take reviews with a pinch of salt and own what you fucking like
i thought this shitposting was going to end once p4k released their review
>>60295468
well desu it makes sense
anything below 9 = trash
anything 9 to 9.9 = its ok I guess
10 = it's good
its how it is
>>60295491
im sorry, but until you all evolve into ascension, im afraid i cannot let that happen
>>60295129
lol cannot you not understand basic math?
7 is far better than 2 or 3 idiot
>>60295129
Anything higher than 6 is a good score from Fantano
>>60295437
Bb, are you forgetting Carles's Law of Buzz Inflation? Anything below a 9.5 is a pan for Grimes
