ITT: Albums only you like.
>>53414431
wrong :^)
>>53414431
fucking great album, m8
IT'S GETTIN' BETTER MAN
Inb4 pleb, gtfo
anti mucore thread
Definitely Maybe > Be Here Now > What's the Story
They're all good.
>>53414572
most non-autists recognize the first two Oasis albums as genuinely great music
>>53414431
this one is still a 50/50 split. I think everyone agrees if they had indulged a bit less it'd be far better
>>53414556
shit taste embarrassment/10
>>53414630
my nigga
This is one of the greatest albums ever made
>>53414639
>most non-autists
where are we though
>>53414556
ONLY you, anon?
>>53414651
therein lies the difficulty
best Oasis song coming thru
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v03BtEzQMxw
>>53414556
I like it too
>>53414661
On /mu/ apparently, its simple and it makes me groove.. I'm not saying its a masterpiece, but I like it
>>53414687
Ma niggs :^)
>>53414698
It's not that bad of an album, I like it
I just think it's shit what a retarded fandom can do to a band
>>53414672
>mfw that's my favorite off of Be Here Now
that feel
>>53414672
Always really liked this one
>>53414630
pretty crit acclaimed but i see what youre getting at. the numbered zeppelins get alot of praise and this gets overlooked
still would take 1 or 2 over it though
>>53414634
are the stone roses worth a listen outside their s/t
>>53414801
yes
Good Times is GOAT
>>53414431
I like it too
>>53414751
nigga what
>>53414556
I used to fuck with an emotionally unstable girl who ended up making my life hell for the last 2 months of my senior year. This was her favorite album.
I fucking hate this album with a firey passion.
>>53414820
love it love it love it love it that and Floored are top class
>>53414856
good it's just a bastardization of the Smiths and Pixies anyway
>>53414801
Dude their b sides are fucking insane.
>>53414556
I like it except for the last track
I liked Be Here Now in my teens, I can see why people call it shit now, though.
If you skip like every second track or something, it's actually on par with their two first albums. The problem is mostly that it's way too long with no reasons for it, half the songs are uninspired and could be cut anyway. Other songs run for way too long, which adds a lot to the running time. My biggest problem with this is having the first three tracks occupy twenty fucking minutes, then you have the end where All Around the World feels like a logical bombastic ending, but it just goes on and on and on and it never fucking ends, but then you have another pointless fucking seven minute vanilla rock track right after it, which finally ends after what feels like an eternity with a decent length instrumental reprise of All Around the World. These stretches are long enough to be a complete album, but they aren't even the meat of the fucking thing.
>>53414907
the last track is the only one i like
>>53414896
I like that one too. I have the bone vinyl.
>>53414886
I know, I didn't enjoy it at the time. But it got her in the mood like nothing else, so I went with it.
>>53414672
best Oasis b-side coming through
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ila4TIEbCKk
>>53414801
Second Coming is fantastic, but more guitar oriented and jammy than s/t. B-side and demo compilations have some gems but some of it is shit. I'd say worth a listen though. Decide for yourself.
>>53414910
thats cocaine for you
>>53414910
Pretty sure Noel Gallagher would agree with you, he has said pretty much the same thing in interviews.
>>53414953
>some of it is shit
Like what?
Turns into stone is a fucking great and flawless b-sides compilation.
>>53414948
>not rockin chair
>not the rod stewart cover of rockin chair
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_SimhTdQc4
tip top plop
>>53414801
absofuckingloutely like someone else said the b-sides but Sally Cinnamon their best song isn't even on s/t
>>53414431
Everyone knows Oasis' first 3 albums are worth listening to plus all the B-sides from those albums too.
There are about 100 or so Oasis tracks from before the year 2000 that are pretty damn good.
>>53415018
this actually brought tears to my eyes ;^ ;
>>53414431
I'm actually looking forward to this getting a remaster.
>>53414630
Their second best after IV for me. 2 is way overrated.
>>53415112
Considering how shitty the first two albums' remasters were, I'm not holding out for any miracles on this one.
>>53415044
I like it too.
>>53415073
>Everyone knows Oasis' first 3 albums are worth listening to
youd be suprised
theres a reason this guy >>53414572
called it anti mucore
>>53415226
nice meme :^)
>>53415252
what
>>53415044
its pretty good man, that cover is gorgeous though
>>53415264
I'm mostly kidding, but I've seen this in almost every sharethread with the same comments on it. Not bagging on it, in fact it's on my backlog
>>53415226
I have never seen this album posted here before.
It's a nice album if you're in the mood for something sort of bubblegum, I feel like it drags on a bit though.
Listen to anything else by them?
>>53414431
Probably
>>53415264
epin meme :^)
This and Foster the People
If dubs everyone posting below me in this thread will get a gf in the next month
If dubs everyone posting below me in this thread will get a gf in the next month
>>53415302
Really? I didn't even realize other people on /mu/ knew about this album. It's quite good but The Pernice Brothers get no love on /mu/ whatsoever.
