Holy fuck.
When is the LOUDNESS WAR finally over?
There's no dynamic anymore in today's records.
>>52657207
Literally no one cares about death magnetic dude
>>52657251
wat
>muh loudness is bad
jheeze i wish you guys would just get over it, it doesn't change the quality of the music
>>52657758
Changes the feel, though. Sometimes it's good to bump up the silent parts, but in music that's supposed to be emotional it's stupid
>>52657758
>it doesn't change the quality of the music
How fucking dumb can you actually be.
Volume dynamics are a core part of what makes music interesting.
>>52657758
A lack of dynamics hurts music more than low bitrate compression
I blame all miriad undeducated armchair producers parroting their favouritest, cheapest, production styles from their favouritest, cheapest, armchair producing artists.
>>52657251
>thinking Death Magnetic is the only album with this problem
kek, alright bud
>>52657897
he's probably just a pop fan. Interesting music is kiinda alien concept to some people
>>52657758
it fatigues the ears
you know there's something wrong when there are plugins with names like "Soundgoodizer" that are basically one-knob compressors.
>>52657942
This.
This album won the loudness war.
WARNING: TURN YOUR SOUND ALMOST ALL THE WAY DOWN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGpji5VF8k8
>>52658749
NOT LOUD ENOUGH
>implying peaked wave form means there is inherently more dynamics in the music.
If I record Jazz at full fucking volume you will hear more dynamics than your audiophile nickelback cd even though there will be clipping.
Loudness war is cool as fuck. Stick to your Steely Dan and Evanescence records.
>>52658913
this b8 doesn't even make sense
>>52658946
98% of people that complain about the loudness war own a steely dan record and love it for its "rich dynamics"
>2015
>still believing in the Loudness War myth
it's like believing 24bit/192hz music is superior
>>52657758
But it does. Although the worst thing about it isn't so much the lack of dynamic range as the clipping distortion.
>>52657906
Much more.
ITT: Deaf people.
Funny how not even fucking amplitude graphs make it clear to them that this shit fucks up music.
I guess the majority of people is just dumb
>>52658888
The fuck. I don't think you know anything about the matter.
>>52659066
But there's more frequencies
>>52661188
>being this new
>>52659708
But bruh it sounds louder so it's better! It even has the bass maxed out so it's the best!
>>52661287
Non sequitur
Pic related
>I should be in charge of how dynamic music is
Um OK
>>52658888
nice quads
>>52657758
Except it sounds like shit you idiot.
High compression music also leads to loss of hearing sensitivity over time.
Enjoy your ear damage retard.
>>52657758
>non-dynamic music is good
fucking memerap fans
itt: shit people wouldn't even notice let alone complain about had some autismal mastering engineer or fervent KVR shitposter not made it his own personal jihad and brought it into the public eye
>>52661550
Just turn it down you dummy.
>>52661416
Are you claiming this is an offender or an exception to the loudness war? Because songs like Tropic of Cancer and Lonely Wanderer have plenty of dynamics.
>>52657758
I'm going to officially diagnose you with Retard Ears
>>52658749
who needs ears anyway
>>52661599
These losers spend more time analyzing waveforms than actually enjoying music.
Most good music is recorded poorly.
>>52661978
>>52661978
cool youtube comment
>>52659034
>steve these headphones are fucked up
LOUDER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ0RFTMpX30
wow, I can't believe people who supposedly listen to music can be that fucking deaf to not hear a difference between a record with silent and loud parts and records that got their silent parts MAXED OUT TO MAXIMUM LOUDNESS.
at this point i don't know anymore who's actually trolling and who's actually dumb as a rock
>>52662204
>silent and loud parts and records that got their silent parts MAXED OUT TO MAXIMUM LOUDNESS
So? Who cares?
>>52662240
leave
>>52662109
well it is my comment, so i have the right to post it here
>>52662071
underrated post
>>52657207
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgCje-4IGzk
>>52662240
i care, a lot
>>52662408
Oh are you a mastering engineer?
>>52661613
>2015
>Still confusing high compression with volume
Turning it down won't prevent hearing sensitivity loss you idiot. There are 2 types of damage:
1. Ear drum damage due to high volume music
2. Hearing sensitivity loss due to high compression music
Do not confuse the two things.
>>52662654
>2. Hearing sensitivity loss due to high compression music
[citation needed]
>>52662683
*You're moms a fag
There's your citation
>>52662754
underage detected
>>52662443
nah, but i know that there is something wrong when the "silent" part is horribly loud
>>52662898
Why? What's wrong with that?
>>52662683
Why do you think ear fatigue from compression often leads to pain in the inner ear? Do you think your ear gets a pain for no reason? It's to tell you that damage is occurring.
If you keep submitting yourself to constant fatigue-inducing sounds, the damage will be cumulative over time (and permanent).
>>52662927
>Why do you think ear fatigue from compression often leads to pain in the inner ear?
Gonna need a citation
>Do you think your ear gets a pain for no reason?
It's from extreme volume, not compression.
>fatigue-inducing sounds
Listening to dynamic music for prolonged periods will also create ear fatigue. It's not limited (no pun intended) to compression.
>>52662654
This
what about constant and non-dynamic music of a middle volume
>>52658749
harsh noise doesn't count
itt: fun police