Why is this video so fucking mesmerizing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-GBTIpUlac
you mean memerizing
>>27605589
cuz butt
>>27605589
>ear piercings
worst pony somehow becomes even worse
>>27605623
That sounds like a newspaper headline.
>>27605589
>Ear piercings
>Ruining my pure waifu with such degeneracy
>ear piercings
best pony somehow becomes better
>>27605643
5 years of >le dyke meme DO make some long-term damage
>>27605607
dis
is nice butt
>>27605643
>pure
that is some nice maymay friendo
>sfm
>Absolute Territory
>not even the original song but some shitty remix
>Rainbow Cunt
>>27605589
Her tail is lift, that means she wants the d
>>27605733
nice meme
>>27605755
nice meme too
>>27605755
>>27605773
heh, radical catchphrase, my main man
>>27605776
Appreciate you concern, family. Let me bow my hat in front of you
>>27605643
Came here to post this.
>>27605643
This.
One piercing per ear would have been acceptable but multiple piercings on just one ear is supreme degeneracy. Dash would never make herself look this hideous.
>>27605904
>>27605923
Finally some sensible people have entered this thread, let's purge this heresy together friends!
>earrings
>muh degeneracy
fuck right off to >>>/pol/
Alvin makes pretty videos, this was not his best work.
My favorite:
https://youtu.be/MHZA27TY6AI
>>27605638
More like a 1930s breaking news on the radio
>NewsFlash! NEWFLASH!
>Worse pony somehow becomes even worse
>Hundreds disgusted!
And all the families and their child shiver in terror around the radio hugging themselves over the horror.
>>27605942
Yes, Dash's purity must remain intact.
>>27605971
You don't need /pol/ to realize that only whores like Rarity wear their earrings in an unconventional manner.
>>27605971
>not embracing /mlpol/
>>>/reddonychandaily/
>>27606035
Oi m8 leave precious Rarara out of this
>>27606047
>/mlpol/
nice meme
>>27606058
All the worst ponies are white.
>>27605589
>Those jump cuts
Holy fucking shit, stop. Please.
>>27606089
Found the leftist sjw
>>27605589
Would be perfect without the piercing. We've never seen her wearing any. Maybe we will one day but surely not that many.
Dash really doesn't appear to me as "degenerate" in any way.
dat ass
>>27606144
and being a dyke isn't degenerate?
>>27605589
>all those piercings
literally furfag material.
>>27605982
Yeah, ive never really been a big fan of sfm, but I for some reason love his videos
Personl Fav right here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgGJnaoK0oM
>>27606208
She's never been seen being interested in any other character in a sexual way. At least it's hard to decide where she's just being nice and friendly and when it's something else. So far she's flirted exactly once (with a dude) and it was just for show.
>>27605739
Dumb Spiderman poster.
>>27606098
kek
>>27606073
>nice meme
Nice meme.
>>27605733
>>27605755
>>27605773
>>27606073
>>27606289
Could all of you go die, please?
>>27605589
Ass is usually pretty mesmerizing, Anon
>>27606331
Nice meme
>>27606331
[insert navy seals copy pasta here]
What's with all the earing hate? Personally, I think the earings look good in this animation, and with all this talk of "muh purty" i fell like you're the type of people who want one of those boring stay at home wives who do nothing but cook, clean, and have scheduled and repetitive sex...
>>27606342
One of these day she will learn how strong it is as a tool to use on stallions.
>>27606349
if you need tattoos and piercings to be interesting, youre not interesting.
>>27606349
Dash feels like a very non-slutty type which doesn't mean that she would be a house wife. I think she would lead a pretty interesting sex life.
>>27605589
>gmod model
>shit track
>piercing
Get a load of this pleb.
>>27606395
im not saying that not having them means you're interesting, but being agaisnt them so profoundlyand using words like "purity" and "degeneracy" makes it seem like you dont like interesting and exciting things either way, and want a super christian and predicatble relationship, you can interesting with or without earings, having them is just an outward appreance of your personality.
(unrelated note, nice use of the veggie tales reaction to counter mine 10/10)
>>27606445
im not one of the people that use those buzzwords, but i personally just see those piercings as hideous and she looks better without them. it doesnt matter if its ugly clothes, ugly makeup or ugly accessories, if its ugly its ugly.y-you too
>>27606506
I gotcha, i can understand if somebody doesnt like the way they look, thats respectable,i mean i fucking hate tattoo sleeves or anything around the neck i just dont get the purityfags...
Because best waifu
>>27606544
Holy shit on toast, what is it with you stains and your fucking ellipses?
>>27606058
Rarity isn't exactly the element of loyalty.
>>27606144
If she does wear an earring it would be clipped on. Metal would not benefit her while flying, neither would holes.
>>27606244
When the fuck was this? Does her imitating Rarity talking about fashion mean she is flirting? No, she is pure.
>>27606349
Those unusual piercings are common in degenerate sluts. What self-respecting man wants a whore as a waifu? A cuck. Cucks are repelled by a happy stable marriage bound together by true love.
>>27606374
Only one stallion, most likely a human male.
>>27606395
This. Ugly women add that shit just like dying their hair a strange color and wearing shitty glasses to divert attention away from their ugliness.
>>27606396
No you fucking cuck! She is the element of loyalty! She will only have one man! She's like a fucking bird!
>>27606445
If you want to be a cuck and eat another man's cum out of her, go ahead. Rainbow Dash would have no part in that. She wants to give her first kiss and virginity to the man she marries because she wants a happy everlasting marriage. Something cucks and sluts will never experience.
>>27606506
This is why RD doesn't wear makeup or curls her eyelashes like a whore. She has natural beauty.
>>27606544
A woman's purity is the most important thing she has. That is what men find the most appealing.
>>27606544
Earrings, especially multiple/unusual ones are a HUGE red flag. I dislike the look, but it also calls into question the character of the person wearing them. Especially since she doesn't have them in the show. I hate to share a standpoint with NRDT, but purity is an important part of a relationship, and earrings are general counter to that. Of course there are exceptions, but it's not likely.
>>27606880
Go back to your cancerous general, NRDT
[SFM] thread?
[SFM] thread!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FoJg94nrgo
It's wierd that with still image porn, I'm up to dark, disgusting fetishes I can't even talk about here to be able to finish fapping, yet I can wank to this practically sfw animation of a smooth, featureless-crotched pony doing nothing but waving its booty, and nut like crazy. Guess that's the mark of well-done sexy booty physics. Same with that 'Fluttershy gets beepbeeped in the maze' video tiarawhy did 3 years back.
>>27605589
Because you want to cum inside her!
>>27607003
>>27606880
i think maybe we have differing views of what were saying as purity, becuase when i think of purity i think of, well has she commited a crime? is she a pathological liar? is she a well known cheater? when i hear it people in this thread bitch over earing being unpure, i think the person saying it wants a relationship where a woman falls in line with the male, walking behind him, cooking for him, cleaning for him, basicly being the sterotypical wife that isnt her own person but is rather the property of her husband, you know the classic pre suffregest woman, now maybe that isnt true of what they want but its a stong signal to me. Earings, in modest ammount and style in this example (although things like clothing hair ect also apply) singal that the wearer isnt afraid to have fun, be adventureous and unorthadoxed, which is something i would think alot of men would find preffrable to a boring relationship that has literally no spice to it.
tldr: earings to me signal not degerancy, but adventure, i dont want a woman who is too afraid to go out in casual cloths becuase men will call her degenrate for not having her dress pass over her ankles
>>27607061
>>27607186
I jizzumed in my long johns
>>27606880
I want to be Top Cunt's friend with benefits.
>>27607180
Yea, that's alotta strawman there. I definitely don't want her to be some sort of 50s housewife or something, I want her to be like she is in the show, obviously. I should add that simple earrings on the earlobe worn occasionally are fine, but like I said, odd/multiple earrings look bad, and are a huge character flag. When I say pure, all I mean is simply a virtues woman, who is a virgin, and is dedicated to her partner, which is no less then I expect from myself. The whole "not wanting an adventurous woman" thing is simply not true. I'm obviously fine with an adventurous woman, or else I wouldn't have waifu ed Dash. I just find that odd/multiple earrings are found 95% of the time on promiscuous and vapid women, so it's a red flag. I also dislike the look.
>>27607342
The 50's housewives thing is just what came off to me when people get all in a wad about earings becuase it indicates 'a slut' or 'degerate', becuase back in the day, people would get in the same fit about a woman not covering her ankles, or knees, its just a progression of scoiety, same dance diffrent song, it just seems as though these people are incredibly controlling with how they want women to express themselves
I think disliking the look is alright, thats human, and everyone has their tastes, but calling earings unpure and calling it a character flaw/flag is not a flaw of the person wearing, but the person judging, becuase the most pure person could be wearing the oddest most unorthoxed cloths, while the most unpure could be wearing a dress past her ankles and covering her head.
and on the adventurous thing, part of that for me is letting the woman express herself, just because shes periced, doesnt mean shes somehow worse, i just think it means that she isnt afraid to go agaisnt socital norms and wear what she feels comfortable in,
>>27607503
>these people are incredibly controlling with how they want women to express themselves
Especially when its not indicative of her actual character, and it seems almost like furfag-tier accessories.
>becuase the most pure person could be wearing the oddest most unorthoxed cloths, while the most unpure could be wearing a dress past her ankles and covering her head.
You need to focus less on possibilities and more on probabilities. Sure, is all of that possible? Yes, but is it a likely thing for those people to do? Of course not. Thats the point of a red flag. Its not a definet thing, and there will be anomalies, but its there to give you a warning, that you need to asses this persons character before moving on.
> i just think it means that she isnt afraid to go against societal norms and wear what she feels comfortable in,
First off, earrings are with societal norms, so that argument is invalid, but second, do you really think that Dash wearing earring is something shed feel comfortable in? She's always show a distaste for any sort of fashion or accessories, and it has no benefit for her flying.
Its very out of place, it looks bad, and its a huge red flag for most women. I think it does partially come down to taste also.
>>27607612
>asses
Assess*
>>27606374
>Rainbow
>learning
Good one, anon!
>>27607612
Okay for 1. i wasnt speaking specifically about dash, i was saying in general for the people who feel a distain for earings, or other unorthadoxed acccessories, its becuase they feel uncomfortable with women expressing themselves, if were talking about character, its a gray area, i know for a fact that she wouldnt wear any wearings considered too feminine, but say the circular ones in the video, those are usually considered to be cool in the same sense that sunglasses are, at least in my experiences with it
seondly, most of the people ive met with those fashion statemnts arent sluts, degerates, druggies or whatever, they've been some of the most down to earth, and normal, becuase they arent being pressured into wearing what they dont want to, it may be a suprise, but alot of 'normal' people find earings, tattoo's or 'odd' clothing to be something they feel like they look good in
thirdly, multiple or odd earings, tattos, or cloths arent above societal norms per say, i will agree it wasnt exactly accurarate to say, i would argue more of the fact that they arent the safest cloths to wear when looking to stray away from redicule from a certain crowd, for example if i were to wear a white shirt and levi's nobody is gonna redicule, but then again nobody is going to compliment, its safe, earings like that, tattos ext are something people are either going to love or hate, and when i see someone wearing something unsafe i think that screams confidence, becuase they are wearing what they like, and are confident enough to wear it and be comfortable even with diffreing opions.
>>27607719
Do you not know how to quote? You dont have to do that "Firstly" thing, just use maymay arrows, like so:
> i wasnt speaking specifically about dash, i was saying in general for the people who feel a distain for earings, or other unorthadoxed acccessories, its becuase they feel uncomfortable with women expressing themselves, if were talking about character, its a gray area, i know for a fact that she wouldnt wear any wearings considered too feminine, but say the circular ones in the video, those are usually considered to be cool in the same sense that sunglasses are, at least in my experiences with it
Despite the fact that the video is about Dash? All of those points are huge assumptions, and im certainly not "controlling" or "uncomfortable with women expressing themselves". Thats a huge strawman and you know it.
>seondly, most of the people ive met with those fashion statements arent sluts, degerates, druggies or whatever, they've been some of the most down to earth, and normal
This is an anecdotal. Just because you know a few people like this doesnt mean anything in this discussion. If they were sluts or degenerates, how would you even know?
> it may be a suprise, but alot of 'normal' people find earings, tattoo's or 'odd' clothing to be something they feel like they look good
This may come as a surprise, but sometimes if you actually read my posts, you'll find how wrong you are here. Ive never said that all earrings are bad, just the odd/multiple ones. The rest of your entire post is all
>muh opinion
which is valid for you, but you were specifically asking about my mindset, then started explaining yours for no reason. You have a number of ad hominem misconceptions, which are really skewing your argument.
>>27607719
Jesus, did you just blow in from summer town? Learn how to format a fucking post.
Thirty seconds of pure crap. 0/10, would not cum inside.
>>27607821
>Do you not know how to quote? You dont have to do that "Firstly" thing, just use maymay arrows, like so:
haha dunno why im not using green arrows, been awhile since i posted on 4chan so i kinda forgot
> All of those points are huge assumptions, and im certainly not "controlling" or "uncomfortable with women expressing themselves". Thats a huge strawman and you know it.
of course it is an assumption, my whole point is that people like
>>27605643
>>27605923
>>27605942
seem like they're uncomfortable with earings becuase they're considered degenerate (same way the dress and the ankle thing is) and are in the buissness of control what women wear, true or not, its just my impression
This is an anecdotal. Just because you know a few people like this doesnt mean anything in this discussion
well you saying that women who wear earings in the fashion in the video are "found 95% of the time on promiscuous and vapid women" is just as much a strawman as my claim is anecdotal. there really isnt a scientific study that says factually that 95% of women who wear this stuff are 'promiscuous and vapid' so all i have to go off is personal experince
>Ive never said that all earrings are bad, just the odd/multiple ones. The rest of your entire post is all
thats kinda what i was reffering to, lets just keep it as a ground rule that when im saying earings, im usually reffering to the ones stated as the central theme of this discussion, haha
>The rest of your entire post is all muh opinion
i was just backtracking from your correct assement that earings are a societal norm, and clarifying what i actually meant
>>27607957
>seem like they're uncomfortable with earings becuase they're considered degenerate
Im pretty sure two of those posters are NRDT. I hate to use ad hominem, but just how new are you that you dont recognize NRDT? Hes a very well known shitposter, so those dont count at all. Earrings in that style are mainly considered degenerate, so in a sense, they are correct, except for NRDT.
>well you saying that women who wear earings in the fashion in the video are "found 95% of the time on promiscuous and vapid women" is just as much a strawman as my claim is anecdotal.
Thats not a strawman. Please learn your logical fallacies before trying to argue. That would also be considered an anecdotal. The major difference though as to why your is an anecdotal and mine isnt is that you specifically asked for my opinion, and I didnt try to use my personal experience as an argument, I just used it as a justification for my reasoning, where as you used your personal experience as a counter argument, which is not valid.
I think we're just arguing in circles here. You had some HUGE misconceptions about why some people (specifically purefags) dislike certain kinds of earrings, and I explained to you why you were incorrect. What else is the problem? What else dont you understand?
>>27608070
Also, here are some links to back up my claim from earlier that most people find multiple ear peircings trashy and unattractive:
http://www.girlsaskguys.com/fashion-style/q547346-piercings-sexy-or-trashy
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/2bctgl/men_do_you_find_multiple_ear_piercings/
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.181820-Piercings-Trouble?page=2
Not really an anecdotal any more, huh?
>>27608134
A third point because im fucking all over the place. If most people dont find them trashy looking, then why does almost every single job position that requires you to interact with the customer require you to take out "over the top earrings" but allow you to keep in single stud, normal earrings? Because most people find them trashy and bad looking, which gives the company a bad image.
>>27608070
>>27608134
>>27608167
>Im pretty sure two of those posters are NRDT. I hate to use ad hominem, but just how new are you that you dont recognize NRDT?
Gotta keep it real here, as much as i'd like to lie and say im a usual poster/lurker, im not a usual enough (nor do i care enough) to recognise certain high profile memeber of /mlp/
>Also, here are some links to back up my claim from earlier that most people find multiple ear peircings trashy and unattractive
wow, reddit, girls ask guys, escapist magizine, real scientific, i wonder what algorithms and complex equations they used to conduct this in depth study... on a serious note, just saying that a select few more people agree with you isnt factual evidence that 95% or even most men find it unacctractive, i could google, 'men find periceings attractive' to what im assuming you googled as 'men find periceings unattractive
>A third point because im fucking all over the place. If most people dont find them trashy looking, then why does almost every single job position that requires you to interact with the customer require you to take out "over the top earrings" but allow you to keep in single stud, normal earrings? Because most people find them trashy and bad looking, which gives the company a bad image.
again as i said before becuase they're not 'safe' outfits to wear it has nothing to do with style, a simple work uniform wont get and compliments or any ridicule, its not taking any chances as it should'nt. ill also admit that most people, including me would'nt find them professional, but that has nothing to do with attractiveness
>I think we're just arguing in circles here
yeah youre right and alot of my original got misconstued, ill keep it simple
disliking earings on any other basis besides the look in unattrative is low, calling soebody degerate on the cloths or styole the feel comfortable in doesnt make them degenrate, it makes you degenerate...
>>27608274
>wow, reddit, girls ask guys, escapist magizine, real scientific, i wonder what algorithms and complex equations they used to conduct this in depth study..
>algorithms and complex equations
>on a matter of opinion
Jesus, just how retarted are you? Of course there were no algorithms, its just a matter of opinion.
>I dont like the point that they prove so your sources arnt valid!
It doesnt matter where they came from, they represent a popular opinion, thus making me correct, and you incorrect. How dumb do you have to be to want a scientific explanation for something that is pure opinion?
>ill also admit that most people, including me would'nt find them professional, but that has nothing to do with attractiveness
But single earrings are professional? Its not a matter of professionalism, because if it was, most places would just ban earrings for employees. They dont want them because it looks bad, and they want their employees to be approachable, i.e. attractive. If this wasnt the case, why not just ban all earrings, there's nothing professional about them.
>disliking earings on any other basis besides the look in unattrative is low,
Here we go again with
>muh opinions
Explain to me exactly how its "low". Am I not entitled to my own opinions, especially when my opinions are backed by (most likely) a majority of people?
>calling soebody degerate on the cloths or styole the feel comfortable in doesnt make them degenrate, it makes you degenerate...
Once again, please dont use words if you dont know what they mean/dont know how to use them correctly. Simply not liking something isnt degenerate, you used that term wrong. Youve literally been pushed back by your lack of any logic to the most basic style of non-argument, name calling. You post doesnt have any actual points, its all just
>I dont like those sources, so its not true LALALALALALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU
or
>no u
You need to form an actual argument and learn how to represent it before starting an argument.
>>27608379
>Jesus, just how retarded are you? Of course there were no algorithms, its just a matter of opinion.
wait wait wait hold up but you said
>Also, here are some links to back up my claim from earlier that most people find multiple ear peircings trashy and unattractive
>Most people
>most
you didnt link me a study that says "breaking fucking news 50 < find earings unattractive" you just found a site where a Few people shared an opion and prused it as something that somehow added to your unsupported claim that most peopl;e dont like peircing, cherry picing at its finist, i mean i could find a website where 100% of people like pericings and would it be right of me to come here and say here is some shit to back up my claim that 100% of people like pericings? of course not! thats just called being fuckign idiotic
>But single earrings are professional? Its not a matter of professionalism, because if it was, most places would just ban earrings for employees. They dont want them because it looks bad, and they want their employees to be approachable, i.e. attractive. If this wasnt the case, why not just ban all earrings, there's nothing professional about them
Heres the simple solution, People normally dont have issues with approaching an employee with a single issue becuase its again something thats fairly standard, something a little more unorthadoxed may make some costomers uncomfortable becuase like i said before its more of a fashion statement that people that diffrent ways, so the employer would rather have the employee dress in the most standard way possible becuase NOBODY is going to have a rpoblem with it, but that does mean white shirts and jenes are the most attrative thing ever? of course not, its just so standard nobody gives a fuck
>Explain to me exactly how its "low". Am I not entitled to my own opinions
well if you cared to listen ( i know its hard) i said many times, its cool if you dislike the look or style, but its uncool when you are making assumptions, judging, or ridiculing somebody on what they're wearing, that sernior, makes you low
>especially when my opinions are backed by (most likely) a majority of people
woah, this here is what we in the industry call speculation...
>I dont like those sources, so its not true
well by default opions arent inherantly true, espeically when an option you claim is popular isnt scientifically considered popular
>You need to form an actual argument and learn how to represent it before starting an argument.
speak for yourself, and next time, choose actual sources to back up your claims, in an intellecual arguement reddit isnt usually the go-to
>>27608547
>you didnt link me a study that says "breaking fucking news 50 < find earings unattractive" you just found a site where a Few people shared an opion and prused it as something that somehow added to your unsupported claim that most peopl;e dont like peircing, cherry picing at its finist,
Come on man, you have to actually read shit before you can comment on it you dumbass. There were multiple people from both sides of the argument commenting, it just so happens that on all three of them the number of people for were out numbered by the number of people against.
>thats just called being fucking idiotic
So is wanting "algorithms and complex equations" for a matter of fucking opinion you dipshit. So is wanting an entire consensus on A FUCKING OPINION.
>>27608685
>Heres the simple solution, People normally dont have issues with approaching an employee with a single issue becuase its again something thats fairly standard, something a little more unorthadoxed may make some costomers uncomfortable becuase like i said before its more of a fashion statement that people that diffrent ways, so the employer would rather have the employee dress in the most standard way possible becuase NOBODY is going to have a rpoblem with it, but that does mean white shirts and jenes are the most attrative thing ever? of course not, its just so standard nobody gives a fuck
Now youre contradicting yourself. You said in an earlier post that it wasnt for fashion reasons, or "standard" reasons, it was for professional reasons. If that was true, then why not ban earrings as a whole? Because it isnt you dumbshit.
>well if you cared to listen ( i know its hard) i said many times, its cool if you dislike the look or style, but its uncool when you are making assumptions, judging, or ridiculing somebody on what they're wearing, that sernior, makes you low
If you cared to read your own posts (I know it must be hard for an absolute retard) youve made a whole fuck ton of assumptions about me, simply because of my opinion. Now youre being hypocritical.
>woah, this here is what we in the industry call speculation...
The industry of what? Being fucking retarded? Ill explain this one more time, its a matter of opinion, so there arnt going to be any definite answers. Thats like wanting a scientific study on which color is the best one, its impossible.
>well by default opions arent inherantly true, espeically when an option you claim is popular isnt scientifically considered popular
Once again, youre being hypocritical. You claim that my opinion isnt scientifically popular, but you have no sources to back this up. How can an OPINION be consider scientific? Youre hitting retardation levels that shouldnt even be possible.
>>27608695
(And a third one because I really fucked up my formatting.)
>speak for yourself, and next time, choose actual sources to back up your claims, in an intellecual arguement reddit isnt usually the go-to
Once again with the
>I dont like your sources so they're untrue LALALALALALALALALALALALALALA
You have yet to establish why that reddit discussion is invalid, or put up any sources of your own. Seriously, with the dank reaction pictures, the holy fuck load of spelling errors, all of the logical fallacies, all of the hypocritical/contradictory statements, and the really shitty representation of an argument, its like youre in fucking 9th grade or something. Learn how to articulate an opinion, and learn how to type faggot.
>>27608685
Hey now im not asking for the options im asking for the popularity of said options
how many like 'this vs this', easy to create a study on that... i think youre misunderstanding what im asking haha
>>27608695
Now youre contradicting yourself. You said in an earlier post that it wasnt for fashion reasons, or "standard" reasons, it was for professional reasons. If that was true, then why not ban earrings as a whole? Because it isnt you dumbshit.
same reason both times, its all about safe cloths vs unsafe ones, sorry i didnt word for word quote both posts to create seamless parallels
>The industry of what? Being fucking retarded? Ill explain this one more time, its a matter of opinion, so there arnt going to be any definite answers. Thats like wanting a scientific study on which color is the best one, its impossible.
Of course its impossible, but im not asking for a study on what opion is right, just which one is most popular, its easy to do a study on the most popular color as seen in this STATISTICAL STUDY https://blog.kissmetrics.com/gender-and-color/
Once again, youre being hypocritical. You claim that my opinion isnt scientifically popular, but you have no sources to back this up. How can an OPINION be consider scientific? Youre hitting retardation levels that shouldnt even be possible.
misunderstanding me again? popularity of said opion is someting we can measure scientifically... (refer to above link)
>You have yet to establish why that reddit discussion is invalid
becuase its less than 20 people in an uncrolled scientific envrionment to see the true popularity of yes vs no
>>27608707
Thats fine, but you really need to work on correctly wording your posts, this is now the second time youve done that.
>>27608700
>Seriously, with the dank reaction pictures
you say as you post one :^)
>the holy fuck load of spelling errors
kinda focusing on substance rather than the nitty gritty, i could stop and spellcheck but that would hinder the progress of this discussion
>and the really shitty representation of an argument
I thought both of our arguemnts were pretty well thought out, but thats just me
>and learn how to type faggot.
Sorry desu
>>27606880
>>27606035
>>27605923
NRDT please leave, piercings may look bad on a pony but you're 100 times more disgusting.
>>27606047
Only 1/4 of the board browses that hellhole. /mlpo/ is just a meme.
>>27608758
>same reason both times, its all about safe cloths vs unsafe ones
Youre still contradicting yourself. You said earrings in that style wernt allowed for professionalism reasons, then you said its for stylistic reasons, and now youre saying its for safety reasons. Well, which is it? You do realize that youre who point is now invalid simply because you cant actually pick a stance and defend it with out moving goal posts, right?
>sorry i didnt word for word quote both posts to create seamless parallels
This must be hard for retards to do, but all I want is you to pick a reasoning for your stance and stick with it, incited of moving goal posts which youve been doing for the last few posts.
>Of course its impossible, but im not asking for a study on what opion is right, just which one is most popular, its easy to do a study on the most popular color as seen in this STATISTICAL STUDY
Holy shit, are you actually retarded? You do know that nothing about poll are scientific, and the can be altered in any way?
http://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2015/09/28/why-public-opinion-polls-are-increasingly-inaccurate
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/21/opinion/sunday/whats-the-matter-with-polling.html?_r=0
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/where-are-the-real-errors-in-political-polls/
Nothing about them is scientific, so youre wrong once again.
>becuase its less than 20 people
There are 80 comments, ony 30 of which are the same people.
>in an uncrolled scientific envrionment to see the true popularity of yes vs no
Yes, because its a poll you mong, all internet polls are uncontrolled. Literally all you have to do is clear your cookies, and you can re-vote. It baffles me that some people out there still think that polls are accurate.
>kinda focusing on substance rather than the nitty gritty, i could stop and spellcheck but that would hinder the progress of this discussion
>>27608861
So is your god awful spelling. Its h=even harder to understand your horrible arguments when I cant even read them.
>I thought both of our arguemnts were pretty well thought out, but thats just me
No, its not. These arnt well thought out, adn I cant tell that this is going to be another one of those arguments that no matter how many arguments of yours I prove wrong, youre never going to admit your errors. Lets go over a quick summary of our conversation.
You start by saying you dont understand a standpoint, followed by a bunch of misconceptions about that point. I told you how wrong you were, and explained the correct answer. Then you started saying that im in the minority opinion. I posted multiple sources proving you wrong. Now, its just delving into this bitter back and fourth where no matter how many times I prove you wrong, youll never admit it. Its alright to be wrong, it happens to everybody. You dont have to throw out all this shit.
>>27605589
That's actually a really nice model, and some nice animations hot damn, far better than the others I saw until now.
The head could be a bit smaller
The earrings are too much
And the tail could be a bit lower (that's not how tails works.)
Song is absolute thrash tho.
Brainpower level of thrash.
Also, we need this with someHORSEPUSSY
>>27605589
For some reason I can't see dash being much of a dancer, she spends too much time in the air.
>>27605589
L-LewdBut some of those quick and jerky camera angles kinda are bad tbqh senpai
>>27609246
its to hide the parts he messed up
>>27605700
they dont think it be like it is but it DO
>>27605733
>child learns new word
>child doesnt stop saying it
4chan as a whole.
>Dashfag/polfag hybrid shitposter
Do not give them your (You)s.
>>27610035
explains why words like cuck became so popular so fast, even though its misused 90% of the time.
kids need to go get a fucking dictionary/thesaurus
>>27605589
This is the first non-porn pony that managed to give me boner.
>>27611175
Have another
>>27611175
Shit, wrong pic
>>27611185
Nope, that ain't enough.
>>27605589
What's up with that expression? Is she menstruating or something?
>>27611199
i give up
>>27611208
Horses don't menstruate.
>>27611219
Equestrian ponies may. We'll never know.
>>27605623
Fuck you, i have ear piercings.Only black studs, though.
>>27606089
The fuck did you just say?
>>27605589
>this is about the tenth time I've watched this
