if you see this on your desktop what would you do?
>>26118367
>Cum on desktop
>>26118367
>fap in front of cam and hope she sees
>>26118367
>Move cursor over her
>It becomes a hand
>She's overjoyed
Mission accomplished
>>26118367
Change the wallpaper and uninstall botnet browser
>>26118389
Now you're thinking with ponies.
>>26118367
Wouldn't that be a hilarious virus? Just whenever you open a tab, Lyra just sits there on the tab and prevents you from pressing the x. Shortcutfags know the alt-f4 but normies don't.
You can minimize the tab, but you can't close it, and whenever you bring the tab back up, Lyra will be sitting there.
Staring.
>>26118406
its chrome
>>26118450
one of my favorite 4chan comments
>>26118367
Scan for viruses.
>>26118453
Exactly
>>26118450And if you hit maximize, what happens?
>>26118485
Literally nothing on that list is something to worry about unless you're doing something illegal.
>>26118520
you cant
>>26118523
>It doesn't affect me so I shouldn't care
>"Yes Anon, we are turning down you down for the job because when you were 15 you used to watch pony porn."
I bet you use Win10 too.
>>26118523
Google already owns the information of everybody anyways.
If you think they actually have time and resources to spy on 1 billion of people using the net everyday, then you are crazy.
>>26118367
>>26118367
bring back our fegel you hiro bastard
>>26118534
>Naming your Google account as your own name
Hi, hope you're enjoying your new computer
>>26118523
so you admit that they are spying? because literally none of that information is useful to anyone unless they were doing something wrong. anyone who uses that software is treated as a criminal before jury, you might as well advocate a camera in your house feeding directly to your local police servers since you aren't doing anything wrong
oh wait, they cant do that because its illegal. i wonder why its illegal, probably has something to do with your inalienable rights your founding fathers wrote up or something
>>26118541
Yeah, you're right. Who would be so crazy to spy at data that could prove very useful for marketing, security, logging purposes? It would be ridiculous!
>>26118568
So you are saying they have time to manually scan 1 billion of people? I doubt that is possible.
And you say they are spying on us like if it was something new, anon.
The more you try to hide, the more they are gonna spy on you.
You are just putting yourself into the pic related, for going against them, you know that, right?
>>26118565
They're collecting browsing history, downloads etc. to serve you relevant ads. Would you rather see something you don't care about on the side, or something you do?
But, of course, you wouldn't believe that.
>N-No, they're gathering it because Google's gonna kidnap 100,000,000+ people or start a revolution or something!! O-Open your eyes, people!
Google isn't going to take over the world with your search history, take off your tinfoil hat.
>No, you don't get it! T-they send it to employers!!
If you honestly name your Google account with your own name, you deserve to be denied your shitty minimum wage job.
>>26118450
at one time a prank virus like that would have been made
nowadays it's all about getting personal data from the unwitting
why can't people have fun anymore
>>26118602
There is no such thing as ads I care about.
>>26118610
Because people making such viruses got sued to hell and back?
>>26118602
>>26118618
but yeah, go on and keep pretending the company literally built on selling its users data would never log sensitive information of a user
>>26118618
Correct, so you probably use Ad Block. That's all fine and good, but when and if I want to support a website I'm visiting, say, 4chan or a favorite YouTube user for example, I can turn Ad Block off for those things, and when I see ads, I would rather see an advertisement about a cool looking game I haven't heard of yet than an advertisement about local lawyers or singles in your area.
>>26118655
>2016
>Adblock
>Not ublock
Eeew.
>>26118635
>Built on selling people's data
You do know that Google is mainly a search engine, right?
Close the window to watch her fall off screen
>>26118663
>2016
>Ad hominem
>Using logical fallacies to respond
Eeew.
>>26118663
>Bugsblock
>>26118681
>>26118681
Ad hominem? Dude, uBlock Origin is way better than any AB or ABP crap.
>>26118664
and how do you think that makes them money?
>>26118698
Seen it, and still think ublock is better.
I mean, it's a fuckton lighter, to the point that even a Pi can handle it without signficant slowdown.
ABP, instead, is a massive memory hogger, and doesn't always work
>>26118691
Can you at least tell me why instead of just stating your opinion?
>>26118718
even better resource wise is updating your routers host file
>>26118718
>a Pi
You are joking right?
I don't think you can even use a broser with less than 1 gb ram nowadays, most sistes tell you that they don't support your win 98 browser no more.
Last time I tried to use the net with a firefox 29, the 256 mb ram wasn't enough. And it has an amd athlon xp 1.4ghz
>>26118718
Just update your fucking computer, fucking poorfag.
>>26118729
Sure, but it's not exactly the same thing as using dedicated plugins for handling blocklists.
For example, one of the blocklist (easylist, IIRC) has a long winded feud with sourceforge, which basically prevents any sourceforge based page from loading. At least, with ABP or UBO I can simply temporarily disable the block, instead of double checking every single time a txt list.
>>26118739
>you are joking right?
Kek, you ricefags make me laugh. Yep, it works, and it's even fast. Retropie+Matchbox+Iceweasel (39 I think). Never had a significant slowdown, it even manages to run youtube videos.
You mean that thing I already have on my computer?
>>26118747
Which one, considering the Pi is just one of the 6 terminals I own?
>>26118787
>Linux users
>>26118800
All of them.
>>26118804
Not my fault I know how to use it.
But don't worry, I'll leave the fan leds to you kids.
>>26118787
Enjoying all those new vidyas, brah?
>>26118739
>>26118787
just use a better browser like surf or something else based on webkit. or use an earlier version of firefox like 3.6.28 (the last good version of firefox)
you also should consider installing linux/bsd like god intended
>>26118827
Maybe your next 'terminal' can substitute for your wit.
>>26118852
I tried Surf, but I don't like it that much. I'm too used to geckoshit, not to mention lazy.
But I fancy some Midori, sometimes.
>>26118829
The ones I can run thru wine with a couple tweaks or those I can play on gaming consoles?
>>26118873
>Still buying consoles
>Using microshit windows is baaaadddd
>But not using a xbone (which really is just a nerfed shitty pc, same for ps4)
You are digging yourself a deeper hole now.
>>26118895
>Using microshit windows is baaaadddd
?
Never said that, the only OS I have some beef with is Appleshit. I just use linux cause I like it, not for any other reason.
>>26118565
Nope, Universal Human Rights art 12.
>>26118916
Then what did you mean with "rice users"
>>26118367
All OP wanted was a Lyra thread
What he got was /g/ flipping shit over Chrome
Silly OP, you should've used Firefox in that picture
>>26118933
That's because we recently had a Lyra thread already, so OP is pushing it by making them too fast.
Mane 6 are excused cause more showtime, but not so much bg pones.
>>26118929
Probably people who use a machine that isn't 3 generations old.
>>26118929
The ones (linux users included) that need to have a bleeding edge pc at every times, even tho the slightly old ones still could work perfectly with a bit of love.
For example, in my room I have an old as shit eMachine with 1gb of ram, for Kodi. And it works surprisingly good.
Anon, I WAS a windows user. I would never diss my past.
>>26118946
that isn't what a ricer is though. a ricer is someone who spends more time making their os look good as opposed to functional
>>26118950
Dude I just want the newest shit because it feels good to own it.
That's my hobby, anon.
Isn't it exciting to unpack a new power source? to upgrade your monitor, your hard drive, gpu and ram?
To update the software, to blow off the dust from the cpu and enjoy that awesome feeling of the pc working again like brand new after that? If you you don't know that feel, then you are missing out.
>>26118969
Uhm, then I used the wrong word, my bad. I thought the rice thing worked also at hardware level.
>>26118969
Yeah, I hate that too. You usually find them in the "Show us your battlestation" threads.
I wonder what they even use their PC for besides making it look good.
/G/ IS LEAKING AGAIN
INSTALL GENTOO
>>26118971
>materialism
No, that doesn't sound good at all, actually. I think I'll keep my money and do something productive instead.
>>26118971
Oh, I used to know that feeling, don't get me wrong. It's just that, after a bit, it felt...pointless.
Nowadays I get more kicks from seeing a supposedly 'dead' machine getting new life with no slowdowns.
But hey, to each his own. Being a bleeding-edgefag is still better than, for example, those people who can't and DON'T WANT TO tinker with their computers a bit, to get them to work.
>>26118994
>tfw you don't even browse /g/ and you are just tech savvy
>>26118997
Confirmed for poorfag.
I bet you are so poor actually, you don't even have spare cash like I do to actually donate to the poor.
Also, we have to have something to amuse us until we die.
>>26118976
how you were using it didn't make sense either. ricers are purely cosmetic, there are hardware ricers, they spend hundreds on a case andspend several days hiding every wire in it. but just using an old pc is simply resourceful. many linux distros for example are built for computers with so little ram like puppy linux and slackware, and even without an x server 256 megabytes is more than enough for a server box
>>26119011
>Confirmed for poorfag.
What kind of logic is that? No, idiot, because I don't buy new shit all the time I actually can hold onto my money and will soon have so much I can retire early. Enjoy being a wage slave.
>>26119016
Just wish I could run a tekkit server with an old toaster.
But I think the mb is burned out or something, I just can't get it to even turn on, I have checked every connection and the power supply works.
Oh well, I guess that's what you get for installing it incorrectly for so many fucking years.I still don't really understand how did it work well for so long when it was just over a napkin...
>>26119016
Yep, my bad again. Wrong word.
Puppy...heh, nice memories. I used that on the first EEEPc (after getting bored of that crippled pre-installed xandros). It was nice, but not very tweakable.
>>26119028
Sorry to ruin your fantasies, but I actually have enough cash to retire right now, without even working.
I am just spending the cash from my job irresponsibly because I fucking can, and I already traveled the world.
>>26119011
>Confirmed for poorfag.
Just wanted to point out, the one that started the whole "ricefags" mess is me, not >>26118997
With my spare money I could probably buy 20-25 bleeding edge new pc (Ok, I would probably die of starvation on a road, after that, but still...)
>>26119056
>mlg
confirmed for cancer
>>26119056
>Things that never happened: The Post
>>26119056
You still have a small dick.
>>26118523
>nothing to hide, nothing to fear
Post your address and your phone number here then.
>>26118367Delete system32
>>26119097
Kek
I knew you would never believe it, but oh well.
I had to sleepin the street at some point, and I still kinda want to die, but at least money is not a problem anymore. Thanks I guess, Father.
>>26119110
kek
>>26118602
What if you don't browse while logged in? Can it still track you?
>>26119136
technically yes, since all they need is your IP.
>>26119068
I used it ironically. Here, have this pic so you think I am double or even triple cancer.
>>26119136
Yes, every machine has its own ID, so the data send is keep offline on their server forever.
>>26119112
No, because if I post them here an actual human will be viewing it instead of it going into a stack of 100,000,000+ users that nobody looks at + holds IP addresses, not home addresses
>>26119147
What's that?
Undertale?
>>26119143
But what if you have dynamic IP?
>>26119148
I thought that hardware id could be changed.
>>26118523
Nothing to hide, nothing to fear is shit. You don't know what the people looking at you think you ought not be doing, so you can't even hide it, but you should definitely fear it.
>>26119160
Yes.
>>26119143
I'm using a pay-per-use modem and the IP seems to change every time I check it. Would that change anything?
>>26119183
They can see your network adapter MAC address.
Unless you change it every time,they know it is you.
>>26119183
>>26119164
Let me put it like this: every single thing you do on internet gets logged. They have your IP and they have a generic anonymous ID related to your machine and location. All they need to do, to track you, is keeping a log of which ID got which IPs.
>>26119171
>You don't know what the people looking at you think you ought not be doing
1.) Google isn't above the law, take off your tinfoil hat
2.) Google will not rise above the law, it's a corporation, take off your tinfoil hat
3.) No actual human being looks at everyone's browsing history, a robot does it and tunes adverts that are served to you accordingly, every chrome user doesn't have their own "guardian angel" employee at Google tracking their every move
>>26119217
they cant log what they cant see, learn what a vpn is nigger
>thread derailed because of /g/ retarded botnet meme
/g/ is the worst board, I don't even know why I keep going on it daily.
>>26119240
Unless you're on hard tor, they can bypass that.
>>26119231
You sure are confident in the system working flawlessly, aren't you?
>>26119251
see
>>26118940
>>26119217
Which is hilarious since that means they are unwilling to hunt over all pedos or else.
Which is proof enough that your conspiracy theories of them being able to track 1 billion people just aren't feasible, otherwise they would have got the all the pedos, the cultists and the killers that browser the net by now.
>>26119056
>"I'm kewl as shit guise!"
>Says while posting on an Indonesian imageboard dedicated to small cartoon horses for little girls
>>26119280
But what if I don't like knowing that some indian is watching my fap history of pony porn and scalie?
>>26119259
i dont actually believe that. that seems more like fear mongering
>>26119274
A little, considering if any corporation in the USA does anything remotely illegal they are facing total shutdown, and the like. Unlike you, I have a little faith in government and don't believe that it's run by a shady underground society that for some reason has different actual laws than the ones that are established and shown to the world so they have the moral permission to take out random people who believe they are law abiding citizens for the lols. And I'm pretty sure Google doesn't have a ninja assassin's creed type sector to take down people who watch the wrong type of porn
>>26119330
https://www.goldenfrog.com/blog/myths-about-vpn-logging-and-anonymity
>>26119231
Law is dictated by the government. Do you know what the government is? It's not sentient, and it's neither benevolent nor malevolent. It's just a system of institutions, all of which ultimately boil down to a bunch of people. Without a head, it would be blind, stupid, and utterly devoid of an agenda. Right now, the United States is a big, plutocratic mess where big corporations are the closest thing that this network has to a head. Big corporations control the government, and Google will do whatever it wants.
>>26119352
Yeah, and the fact people don't get hired for jobs because their employer uses Google to search for their name and if they find anything they don't like they don't hire them isn't enough of a reason for you to be wary of things that try to preserve all sorts of information about you forever?
inb4 "you put it on there yourself!" No my friend, this is that belief in the system thing that you have again.
>>26119231
They set up huge vacuums for data.
All the government needs is a subpoena and google will hand over all the nitty gritty details and they can find something to hammer you down with.
>>26118587
The whole point is that the systems are not human active ones but passive sinks of information.
It is very possible to prevent data from leaking to them and the less you allow, the better.
They don't "try harder" because no one is monitoring these systems to that degree, they just don't see any information.
>>26119403
Not sure if you know or not, but the United States of America is led by three branches. The executive, or the President of the USA and about 5 million workers, the legislative, which includes the Senate and the House of Representatives, and the Judicial, which includes the Supreme Court. None of these branches include businesses or corporations. Typically, a nation is run by government, not businesses, which is the system the USA follows. Also, companies are defined in law as "legal persons," or basically under the same laws as a real person. Google doesn't have the right to go and murder someone because they feel like it because Google has the same rights as a person.
>>26119458
Google ≠ NSA
Google doesn't have a fucking cabinet somewhere that states "User 'Fuckmeintheass Clinton' is actually 'Joe Brown'. Make sure to tell employers this if they ask." They don't have the time or resources to go to every single user that has a Google account's IP address, look up their home address and get the names of everyone who lives there, it's A.) illegal and B.) too inaccurate, as multiple people may live in one home who all have Google accounts.
>inb4 "but Google is above the law, they are working with the government and getting away with literal murder!"
Read what I wrote to the other poster, companies don't have different, more laxed laws than people
>>26119641
>companies don't have different, more laxed laws than people
Not the anon you were talking to, but they kinda do, if their activity can ease the control operated by the government.
This of course doesn't mean they can do what they want, nor that they can kill people. See more it like this: they are placed into a sistem that can slow down a bit their fall if they happen to bend the law, enough to get around it.
>>26119729
>OFF THE BACK OF THE KEEPER! OFF THE BACK OF THE KEEPER! STALLMAN, NO!!!!
Muh dick
>>26119738
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzWiMdRlHmE
24:29
Every time
>>26119749
>I was watching the match with a friend, on irc.
>When /g/ scored the 1-0, my friend started to say "Fuck, it's over..."
>I just wrote "...faith"
>Then, after the 1-1 I wrote again "See? Faith".
>And then, when rape scored...
>"I FUCKING TOLD YOU TO HAVE FAITH! I FUCKING DID!"
Nice memories.
>>26118367
>rape
>>26119749
This is what made 2015 special.
squeek
Ha
http://venturebeat.com/2016/01/13/nvidia-blames-apple-for-bug-that-exposes-porn-browsing-in-chromes-incognito-mode/?utm_share=wired
>>26119641
Corporations have their claws in every branch of government. They decide who runs for president through donations (executive), they bribe representatives and pay for lobbyists (legislative), and the supreme court has favored them enough to allow the previously stated things happen (judicial). And that's just talking about branches, not to mention the influence they have over the population through TV and whatnot.
