Check out my analysis of Metamophosis by Franz Kafka. It's the best, most thorough analysis of Metamorphosis to-date.
Okay, post it.
>>8294588
One moment, okay?
>>8294580
weak bait
>whose three sisters died in concentration camps during WWII
>lying in your analysis
>>8294637
Is true.
>>8294646
how is it true if the holocaust never happened
>>8294682
GOT HEEM!!!
>>8294580
Your punctuation is sloppy and you try too hard to make your sentences complex at the expense of readability. This is particularly noticeable in your thesis paragraph, which should thrive on the concision of its message (syntax is a part of this).
The inclusion of contextual information about Kafka is only good if you then refer to it in a relevant way during your analysis - mentioning Kafka's sisters in concentration camps and then never going back to it is jarring and leaves the reader wondering why it was raised in the first place. A more relevant contextual factor to draw on in this case would be the archetypal German family of the early 20th century where the young male would be the main provider for the rest of the family
The 'three symbols' you refer to could be better described as recurring motifs, and the constant returns to them as ideas are used as vehicles for the exploration of the central theme, not the conveyance of it. Broaden your use of technical vocabulary with terms like 'metaphor', 'simile', 'imagery' and 'motif' (these are just basic starters - you will learn more in time).
Analysis is a separate skill to recounting the plot, and you get bogged down in just retelling the story with little to no substantial building off of the back of it. Don't be afraid to jump around in the story while analysing, nobody should be reading an analysis of a text they aren't already familiar with.
Your conclusion is non-existent, it needs to reiterate your thesis statement and affirm the ways in which you have proved it to be valid.
I'd guess this is bait but if you were genuinely trying then these are some pointers to get you going.
