How hard is to get published if you want to share unpopular ideas? Would it be too risky if you want to enter in politics in a future?
there won't be politics in the future
Present them as satire,
Or create a sci-fi world that allows your views to slip under the radar.
Or present views opposing your own in such a way that readers are driven to yours.
Or find out if Resistance records does publishing.
Your ideas are neither important nor original and your presentation will certainly be lackluster, but pls write about it so the masses can know to keep you out of power
>>8289630
Are these "redpilled" ideas, OP?
>implying the average citizen can be someone
>implying ideas are relevant to be someone
If you're looking for an easy ride, politics ain't for you.
The publishing world you will find challenging enough, possible too much so.
>>8289652
Depends on the point of view.
>>8289666
Are you suggesting me to go straight for the digital distribution? I feel it a bit "unprofessional".
>>8289647
I like your ideas, and I know that many people did it before, but that may be a bit too elaborated for a simple "list" of calls for attention and suggestions.
>>8289633
>>8289651
>>8289660
No better place than home.
>>8290163
You are. Own it.
>>8289630
Pull a Unabomber
>>8292061
That's not classy, anon.
test
>>8289630
The real question is: Why do you want to enter politics if you're not there to achieve a policy that aligns to your ideas?
You're going to write a book about the ideas you have, and then enter politics professing a different viewpoint? Why?
>>8289630
Yes. Most great writers (such as Schopenhauer) resigned themselves to the fact that their unpopular ideas would only be appreciated long after death. By some happy accidents, we occasionally have controversial writers who find success in life.
By this I mean truly controversial, however. Much of what people deem to be controversial nowadays, is in fact operating within the confines of social respectability - even if daring to push these limits on occasion.
>>8294390
>You're going to write a book about the ideas you have, and then enter politics professing a different viewpoint? Why?
Not entering with a different point of view, but a softer one that will go in crescendo. Unfounded retroactive judgement is too common nowadays, and it could destroy you too easily. Not sure if you get what I mean.
>>8294429
>we occasionally have controversial writers who find success in life
The controversial writers I know don't surpass the "I use bad language to look edgy, but I have zero real influence" line. Could you give some examples, please?
