was he a pedo
everyone was a pedo back then
He was either a pedo or the only guy to feel true agape this side of Romeo.
I'm leaning for the former.
>>8286346
>agape
i only know what this means because philip k dick broke it down in one of his novels
>>8286352
Lucky you. I got classical education in highschool, it's not the kind of thing you want to hear when you're 14 and your class is two thirds female. Made the sentimental landscape of the next five years look like Chechnya.
Which novel was it?
>>8286312
It's complicated.
>>8286366
the transmigration of timothy archer, timothy archer being a fictionalization of bishop james albert pike
>Made the sentimental landscape of the next five years look like Chechnya.
kek
I doubt it. He was just autist.
It was old style pedoing, before it got such a bad name
>>8286366
what the hell are you talking about
>>8286767
Agape, or: a love that trascends physical or mental boundaries, something more akin to Plato's reunion of the cleaved soul than to sex or courting; think Platonic love. Originated in Ancient Greece, not sure when.
Now imagine laying this on a classfull of gullible teens.
>>8286796
were you raised in some shithole doomsday prepper community? what kind of teens are dumb enough to let that stop them from fucking like rabbits
>>8286869
Welcome to Italy - but yeah, that didn't really stop us. Just meant we had to get our hands on beer (16 was the drinking age at the time, what awesome glory) or drugs - but you know, it still worked against us. Or me. Dunno about the others, honestly.
IT WAS THE 70'S
>>8286323
True, pedophilia being wrong is relatively new. Girls can be pregnant at around 10 years old, why would you wait another 10+ years? 10 year olds used to be able to rule kingdoms but now we coddle them til them 30.
>>8286897
People who like little girls are just confused individuals who mistake their feelings for being sexual. The people who actually sexual abuse children do it out of opportunity and not attraction.
>>8286999
Nah people can actually be attracted to them, my friend told me.
>>8286312
No he was more like a Cunnyposter, he just appreciated the purity of the female child.
Remember, this was an age where grown men would have a nervous breakdown on their wedding consummation when they saw their wives had hairy pussies
Is there actually anything to this or are you like a midwestern soccer mom where anyone who makes eye contact with a female child is a pedo?
>>8286999
/jp/ here.
Boy, are you wrong.
>>8287164
http://petapixel.com/2014/04/18/look-unknown-controversial-photography-career-lewis-carroll/
>>8287220
MODS
>>8286999
I am literally only attracted to 13-15 year old girls, no exceptions ever. This is extreme attraction, and is completely exclusive. I know plenty of people with the same but for girls half this age.
Don't delude yourself Anon.
>>8287282
yes, Pictures like the nudes are not sexual in nature they are more about innocence and purity. (at face level anyway the Victorians used to marry girls off at very young ages 13 was a common age for a girl to start "hunting a man"
>>8286897
They released that pedophilia was a thing by this time though. The 1870s saw the introduction of the first age of consent laws for girls in the UK. Anything under 12 and you were officially a sick fuck, though the main reason for the law was that they'd stuff brothels full of little virgins because Victorian men were afraid of contracting STDs from grown whores.
>>8287282
Carroll made it a sexual thing though. He had a mother or some other grown woman at hand throughout the long process of taking a photograph because he was afraid he wouldn't be able to control himself like a proper repressed Victorian.
Would it really matter if he was?
As long as you're not attacking children there's nothing wrong with being a pedo.
