you might want to check out rhetoric

>>8276363
dont try to convince them, thats the best method

>>8276363
The socratic method. Google it, OP.

>>8276457
>>8276461
>>8276469
But are those good, I feel like they are merely effective.

>>8276484
oh

then try reason

>>8276498
which one

Can I convince someone to reply?

>>8276843
no

File: japanese-goblin.png (47 KB, 256x256) Image search: [Google]

47 KB, 256x256

my grandfather always used to say this

>A gun in your hand and a fedora up your head keep the normies in check

yeah. the metaphor.

>>8276469
thats not for convincing people. thats for clarifiying ones own or his ideas.

maybe op is looking for rhetoric?

>>8277163
>>8277135
you can use a fallacy to convince a person but it is wrong in itself. does there exist an argument for another method of persuasion being different?

>>8276363
Depends on what you are trying to convince a person of. Atheists try to use logic to convince the religious that there is no God, but the conviction of the religious believe is emotional, not logical, so it fails.
Likewise, religious believers try to use emotional arguments to convince atheists that there is a God, but atheists are heartless, robotic husks of people, so it fails.

>>8277368
>he still splits arguments between reason/emotion

please, atheism is as emotional as any religious view.

>>>/sci/

>>8277378
Logos, pathos and eros

>>8276363
Rhetoric is literally the art of persuading people.

Yeah, money.

>>8277583
/thread

Look up street epistemology.