>Some may seize on it as a masterpiece, but it is a bloated monster of a book. (...) The bloat is a consequence of sheer adipose verbosity and an unremitting condition of moral and intellectual flatulence.
nobody that matters said this about IJ
STOP TRYING TO RUIN DFW'S NAME
>>8228870
Not an argument.
Is this is the only book you care about? Have you read a single book in your life or you just shitpost? Why every tenth post here have to be about IJ, where most of the people haven't even read it. No one claims it to be a masterpiece of literature. Yes, it's a good book. Please, get your shit together.
>>8228888
>No one claims it to be a masterpiece of literature.
Excuse me?