Why is reading with no purpose even a thing? I forget almost literally everything I read, probably because I read for the sake of reading, so I'm not called a pleb for not reading.
>inb4 muh human condition
LMAO, what a joke. Art should be entertainibg. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to guilt people in to reading their shitty boring self indulgent art or trying to seem like an intellectual by worshiping someone else's boring art.
>>8210667
What you find boring may be entertaining to others.
I read to both better myself and be entertained.
>>8210667
if you actually think ALL art should be entertaining, kill yourself pleb.
>entertainment is objective
>>8210667
>Art should be entertainibg
>Art should be entertaining
>Art should be
>Art should
You literally do not know what Art is. I bet you think poetry is about rhyming. I don't usually tell people to fuck off or kill themselves but goddamn it you need to do one or the other.
>>8210667
>I read for the sake of reading, so I'm not called a pleb for not reading
Then you clearly don't read for the sake of reading. You read to bolster your image. If you were genuinely interested in what you were reading you would remember something.
>>8210667
As much as I want to develop this thread into a fruitful discussion, I really don't want to bother defending you against them, especially because you're completely wrong, and their reductive points are sufficient to refute your idiocy. This thread was poisoned as soon as it started.
Try coming up with some defensible points next time.
